<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">finance</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Finance: Theory and Practice</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2587-5671</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2587-7089</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-1-79-92</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">finance-4173</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИНВЕСТИЦИОННАЯ ПОЛИТИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INVESTMENT POlICY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Условная конвертируемая аренда или долг?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Contingent Convertible Lease or Debt?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2274-8960</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Трики</surname><given-names>О.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Triki</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Онс Трики – аспирант, факультет экономики и менеджмента</p><p>Сфакс</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ons Triki – PhD Student, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences</p><p>Sfax</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">onstriki123@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8266-9036</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Абид</surname><given-names>Ф.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Abid</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Фатхи Абид – PhD, профессор, факультет экономики и менеджмента</p><p>Сфакс</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Fathi Abid – PhD, Prof., Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences</p><p>Sfax</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">fathi.abid@fsegs.usf.tn</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Университет Сфакса</institution><country>Тунис</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>University of Sfax</institution><country>Tunisia</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>79</fpage><lpage>92</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Трики О., Абид Ф., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Трики О., Абид Ф.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Triki O., Abid F.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/view/4173">https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/view/4173</self-uri><abstract><p>Данная статья посвящена изучению взаимодействия между инвестиционной и финансовой стратегиями в динамической модели с существующими активами и вариантом роста, при котором инвестиционные затраты могут финансироваться либо за счет условного конвертируемого арендного капитала, либо за счет конвертируемого заемного капитала. Цель исследования – изучить влияние этих двух моделей как инструмента финансирования на сроки конверсии, коэффициент конверсии и оптимальную стоимость фирмы в различных сценариях. Разница между контрактами CoColease и CoCodebt с точки зрения моделирования изучается путем анализа закрытых решений компании с использованием подхода реальных опционов и теории безрисковых цен. Результаты показывают, что конвертируемая аренда с низкой амортизационной стоимостью и достаточно высоким коэффициентом конверсии имеет менее серьезные недостатки, связанные с передачей рисков и чрезмерным долгом, чем конвертируемая задолженность. В частности, при высокой ставке арендодательского налога, равной τι = 0,3, акционеры столкнутся с искажением долгового бремени, и они будут иметь серьезные стимулы для передачи рисков. При использовании условного конвертируемого лизингового финансирования вместо конвертируемого долга время конвертации может быть отложено. В ходе исследования был сделан вывод о том, что финансирование через конвертируемые лизинговые контракты с низкой амортизационной стоимостью более выгодно, чем через долговые обязательства CoCo, однако при высокой налоговой ставке арендодателя ситуация меняется в пользу заемных средств.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This paper focuses on examining the interaction between investment and financing strategies in a dynamic model with existing assets and a growth option where the investment cost can be financed either by contingent convertible leaseequity or by convertible debt-equity. It aims to study the impact of these two models as a financing instrument on conversion timing, conversion rate and the optimal value of the firm in different scenarios. The difference between CoColease and CoCodebt contracts from a modeling point of view is explored by examining the company’s closed solutions using the real options approach and risk-free price theory. The results reveal that the convertible lease with low amortization value and sufficiently high conversion rate has less severe inefficiencies resulting from risk transfer and debt overhang than those caused by convertible debt. In particular, with a high landlord tax rate equal to τι = 0,3, shareholders will experience a distortion of debt overhang and will have strong incentives to transfer risks. The conversion time may be delayed with conditional convertible lease financing instead of convertible debt. The research work concludes that financing through convertible leasing contracts with a low amortization value is more advantageous than that of CoCo debt, but if the lessor’s tax rate is high, the opposite may be true.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>условная конвертируемая аренда</kwd><kwd>условный конвертируемый долг</kwd><kwd>возможности роста</kwd><kwd>долговая нагрузка</kwd><kwd>смещение рисков</kwd><kwd>структура капитала</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>contingent convertible lease</kwd><kwd>contingent convertible debt</kwd><kwd>growth option</kwd><kwd>debt overhang</kwd><kwd>risk-shifting</kwd><kwd>capital structure</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sundaresan S., Wang N., Yang J. Dynamic investment, capital structure, and debt overhang. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies. 2015;4(1):1-42. DOI: 10.1093/rcfs/cfu013</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sundaresan S., Wang N., Yang J. Dynamic investment, capital structure, and debt overhang. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies. 2015;4(1):1-42. DOI: 10.1093/rcfs/cfu013</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tan Y., Yang Z. Contingent capital, capital structure and investment. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 2016;35:56-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2015.10.016</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tan Y., Yang Z. Contingent capital, capital structure and investment. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 2016;35:56-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2015.10.016</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hilscher J., Raviv A. Bank stability and market discipline: The effect of contingent capital on risk taking and default probability. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2014;29:542-560. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.03.009</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hilscher J., Raviv A. Bank stability and market discipline: The effect of contingent capital on risk taking and default probability. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2014;29:542-560. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.03.009</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McConnell J.J., Schallheim J. S. Valuation of asset leasing contracts. Journal of Financial Economics. 1983;12(2):237-261. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(83)90037-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McConnell J.J., Schallheim J. S. Valuation of asset leasing contracts. Journal of Financial Economics. 1983;12(2):237-261. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(83)90037-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grenadier S. R. Leasing and credit risk. Journal of Financial Economics. 1996;42(3):333-364. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405x(96)00882-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grenadier S. R. Leasing and credit risk. Journal of Financial Economics. 1996;42(3):333-364. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405x(96)00882-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ambrose B. W., Emmerling T., Huang H. H., Yildirim Y. Capital structure and the substitutability versus complementarity nature of leases and debt. Review of Finance. 2019;23(3):659-695. DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfy004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ambrose B. W., Emmerling T., Huang H. H., Yildirim Y. Capital structure and the substitutability versus complementarity nature of leases and debt. Review of Finance. 2019;23(3):659-695. DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfy004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kouzmina Е., Okrepilov V. Risk management of leasing companies. E 3S Web of Conferences. 2019;110:02034. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201911002034</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kouzmina Е., Okrepilov V. Risk management of leasing companies. E 3S Web of Conferences. 2019;110:02034. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201911002034</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Qu J., Liu H., Zhu H., Gao H. An asset value evaluation for docking finance lease problems in the peer-to-peer platform. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2021;22(1):236-256. DOI: 10.3846/jbem.2020.13380</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Qu J., Liu H., Zhu H., Gao H. An asset value evaluation for docking finance lease problems in the peer-to-peer platform. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2021;22(1):236-256. DOI: 10.3846/jbem.2020.13380</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krishnan V. S., Moyer R. C. Bankruptcy costs and the financial leasing decision. Financial Management. 1994;23(2):31. DOI: 10.2307/3665737</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krishnan V. S., Moyer R. C. Bankruptcy costs and the financial leasing decision. Financial Management. 1994;23(2):31. DOI: 10.2307/3665737</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Graham J. R., Lemmon M. L., Schallheim J. S. Debt, leases, taxes, and the endogeneity of corporate tax status. The Journal of Finance. 1998;53(1):131-162. DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.55404</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Graham J. R., Lemmon M. L., Schallheim J. S. Debt, leases, taxes, and the endogeneity of corporate tax status. The Journal of Finance. 1998;53(1):131-162. DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.55404</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yan A. Leasing and debt financing: Substitutes or complements? The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2006;41(3):709-731. DOI: 10.1017/S0022109000002593</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yan A. Leasing and debt financing: Substitutes or complements? The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2006;41(3):709-731. DOI: 10.1017/S0022109000002593</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Myers S. C., Dill D. A., Bautista A. J. Valuation of financial lease contracts. The Journal of Finance. 1976;31(3):799-819. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb01924.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Myers S. C., Dill D. A., Bautista A. J. Valuation of financial lease contracts. The Journal of Finance. 1976;31(3):799-819. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb01924.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eskindarov O. M., Maniakhin T. V. Liquidity maneuver in the Russian financial system in the context of inflation issues and stock market development. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(5):47-63. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-5-47-63</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eskindarov O. M., Maniakhin T. V. Liquidity maneuver in the Russian financial system in the context of inflation issues and stock market development. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(5):47-63. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-5-47-63</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Korobeynikov D. A. Credit in the model of the infrastructure industry ecosystem of the agro-industrial complex. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(5):77-89. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-5-77-89</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Korobeynikov D. A. Credit in the model of the infrastructure industry ecosystem of the agro-industrial complex. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(5):77-89. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-5-77-89</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Srivastava H., Moid S., Rushdi N. J. Impact of anchoring, herding and loss-aversion on working women’s investment decision-making. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(5):90-99. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-5-1456-01</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Srivastava H., Moid S., Rushdi N. J. Impact of anchoring, herding and loss-aversion on working women’s investment decision-making. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(5):90-99. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-5-1456-01</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lopatenko V. V., Karminsky A. M. Simulation of the bankruptcy event of companies associated with a business group. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(3):94-108. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-3-94-108</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lopatenko V. V., Karminsky A. M. Simulation of the bankruptcy event of companies associated with a business group. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(3):94-108. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-3-94-108</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hackbarth D., Mauer D. C. Optimal priority structure, capital structure, and investment. The Review of Financial Studies. 2012;25(3):747-796. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhr129</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hackbarth D., Mauer D. C. Optimal priority structure, capital structure, and investment. The Review of Financial Studies. 2012;25(3):747-796. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhr129</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glasserman P., Nouri B. Contingent capital with a capital-ratio trigger. Management Science. 2012;58(10):1816-1833. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1520</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glasserman P., Nouri B. Contingent capital with a capital-ratio trigger. Management Science. 2012;58(10):1816-1833. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1520</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pennacchi G., Vermaelen T., Wolff C. C.P. Contingent capital: The case of COERCs. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2014;49(3):541-574. DOI: 10.1017/s0022109014000398</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pennacchi G., Vermaelen T., Wolff C. C.P. Contingent capital: The case of COERCs. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2014;49(3):541-574. DOI: 10.1017/s0022109014000398</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tan Y., Yang Z. Growth option, contingent capital and agency confl icts. International Review of Economics &amp; Finance. 2017;51:354-369. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2017.06.006</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tan Y., Yang Z. Growth option, contingent capital and agency confl icts. International Review of Economics &amp; Finance. 2017;51:354-369. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2017.06.006</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huang H.-M., Yildirim H. Lease fi nancing, credit risk, and optimal capital structure. 2006. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228425072</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huang H.-M., Yildirim H. Lease fi nancing, credit risk, and optimal capital structure. 2006. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228425072</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Leland H. E. Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure. The Journal of Finance. 1994;49(4):1213-1252. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb02452.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leland H. E. Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure. The Journal of Finance. 1994;49(4):1213-1252. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb02452.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
