Power, Market and social system Complexity: Theoretical Model of Financial and Management Mechanism

The article considers the influence of the complexity of the social system on the growth of financial costs for the maintenance of the central management system. The subject of the article is Professor Dmitry Sorokin’s theory that Russia cannot be a world technological leader due to objective reasons: a large territory, a severe climate, a multinational and multi-confessional composition of the population. These conditions predetermine a strong power vertical and increased financial costs, leading to the bureaucratic despotism and worse effectiveness of market innovation mechanisms. The relevance of the problem is in the need to clarify the management capabilities and limitations of regimes with strong centralized power. This issue is becoming more urgent due to the fact Wagner’s law, which requires faster growth of public expenditure compared to the economy, has ceased to operate. The article aims to theoretically illustrate and to test the theory by D. Sorokin. On this purpose, the authors built a simple theoretical model of economic growth with an institutional factor reflecting the properties of the control system. The novelty of the approach consists in building an institutional function that includes management costs for maintaining the internal integrity of the country and its external security, the management potential (“strength”) of the central government and the mechanism of market selfgovernment. The initial driving force of the model is the growing complexity of the managed system, which, by D. Zolo’s complexity theory, leads to the wide spread of authoritarian political regimes. The analysis of the model and computational experiments allowed to establish the conditions when Sorokin’s theory is valid and when not. The calculations have led to the conclusion that even a tough authoritarian rule can stimulate the country’s economic development, provided that the current system of central government is highly efficient and low in financial capacity.

1. Silaev D. P., Ganzhur M. A. The phenomenon of self-organization and the law of the need for diversity by U. R. Ashby. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. 2018;(59-4):259-263. (In Russ.).

2. Balatsky E. Concept of complexity and economic theory of democracy. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economy. 2013;(5):5-24. (In Russ.).

3. Bogdanov A. A. Tectology: General organizational science. Moscow: Lenand; 2019. 680 p. (In Russ.).

4. Tzirel S. V. “Qwerty effects”, “path dependence” and the Sedov law, or is the creation of stable institutions in Russia possible? Ekonomicheskii vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Economic Herald of Rostov State University. 2005;(3):44-56. (In Russ.).

5. Tzirel S. V. “Qwerty effects”, “path dependence” and the law of hierarchical compensation. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2005;(8):19-26. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2005-8-19-26

6. Balatsky E. Wagner’s law, Armey-Rahn curve and wealth’s paradox. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economy. 2010;(9):80-97. (In Russ.).

7. Bainev V., Komar I. Government spending and Wagner’s law. Finansy, uchet, audit. 2009;(12):30-33. (In Russ.).

8. Zizek S. The year of dreaming dangerously. London, New York: Verso Books; 2012. 142 p. (Russ. ed.: Zizek S. God nevozmozhnogo. Iskusstvo mechtat’ opasno. Moscow: Evropa; 2012. 272 p.).

9. Zolo D. Democracy and complexity: A realist approach. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press; 1992. 202 p. (Russ. ed.: Zolo D. Demokratiya i slozhnost’: realisticheskiy podkhod. Moscow: HSE Publ.; 2010. 320 p.).

10. Toynbee A. J. Civilization on trial. New York, London: Oxford University Press; 1948. 255 p.; Toynbee A. J. The world and the West. New York, London: Oxford University Press; 1952. 99 p. (Russ. ed.: Toynbee A. J. Tsivilizatsiya pered sudom istorii. Mir i Zapad. Moscow: AST; Astrel; 2011. 318 p.).

11. Bardhan P., Mookherjee D., eds. Decentralization and local governance in developing countries: A comparative perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2006. 363 p.

12. Grindle M. S. Going local: Decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007. 256 p.

13. Gong Q., Liu Ch., Wu M. Does administrative decentralization enhance economic growth? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Economic Modelling. 2021;94:945-952. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.035

14. Andreev O., Arabsky A., Kramar V. On the problems of transition to modern management systems. Standarty i kachestvo = Standards and Quality. 2012;(8):56-59. (In Russ.).

15. Khomyakov V. N. Cybernetics, law of requisite variety, and development of economic indicator forecasts. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki = News of the Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences. 2014;(1-1):128-141. (In Russ.).

16. Skorkova Z. Competency models in public sector. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016;230:226-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.029

17. Sheburakov I. B. Reserves of managerial personnel in the Russian Federation as a tool for the development of personnel in the field of public administration. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie = RUDN Journal of Public Administration. 2019;6(2):148-157. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2312-8313-2019-6-2-148-157

18. Cahyaningsih E., Sensuse D. I., Arymurthy A. M., Wibowo W. C. NUSANTARA: A new model of knowledge management in government human capital management. Procedia Computer Science. 2017;124:61-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.130

19. Balatsky E. V., Yurevich M. A. Central government, market competition and technological progress: Model experiments and stylized examples. Journal of Economic Regulation. 2020;11(3):2137. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17835/2078-5429.2020.11.3.021-037

20. Balatsky E. V., Ekimova N. A. Alternative model for managing innovation and high-tech sector of the Russian economy. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2020;11(5):2-16. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-5-1

21. Yew Lee Kuan. One man’s view of the world. Singapore: Straits Times Press Pte Ltd.; 2013. 348 p. (Russ. ed.: Yew Lee Kuan. Moi vzglyad na budushchee mira. Moscow: Alpina Non-Fiction; 2017. 446 p.).