Food security: state Financial support Measures for sustainable Development of Agriculture in Russian Regions

In the context of global economic instability, the problem of ensuring food security and sustainable development of agriculture at the international, national and regional levels becomes urgent. Existing methods for assessing the state of food security and sustainable development of agriculture, as a rule, have two main drawbacks: first, they are often static, and second, they include a scattered list of indicators that are difficult to systematically interpret in the analysis. Therefore, the aim of the study is to develop an adequate methodology for assessing the food security of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The construction of a thematic index is carried out in three stages: 1) a system of indicators is formed; 2) the values of indicators are normalized; and 3) sub-indices are calculated. The analysis of domestic and foreign literature on food security provided the methodological basis of the study. The system of indicators was clarified, which were combined into three groups (numerical indicators of the sphere of production, distribution, consumption, and food). The authors extended the retrospective assessment of food security at the meso-level by ranking and clustering Russian regions using hierarchical analysis and a new data filtering algorithm. The hierarchical procedure is based on a system of mathematical filtering of data, which is fundamentally different from existing methods for analyzing hierarchies. The authors replaced the fuzzy “what if” logic with a clear subordination of ranked indicators (subindices). The group of leaders was selected considering the accepted priority of indicators, the rest of the regions were united into a new subgroup, among which leaders and outsiders were singled out. At each new stage, new groups are ranked after excluding leaders and outsiders, they are in the “center of the circular convolution of data”, the procedure for stopping the procedure is the presence of two groups. This is a fundamental feature, scientific novelty, and value of the mathematical apparatus for multidimensional ranking of Russian regions in terms of food security. The authors concluded that in modern Russia the problem of food security has not yet been resolved due to the insufficient use of general economic and special levers to increase the stability of the food system. The results of the study can be applied in the process of updating the state policy in the field of ensuring the sustainability of food systems at the macroand meso-level of management.

1. Fanzo J. Ethical issues for human nutrition in the context of global food security and sustainable development. Global Food Security. 2015;7:15–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2015.11.001

2. Ferranti P., Berry E.M., Anderson J.R., eds. Encyclopedia of food security and sustainability. Amsterdam, Cambridge, MA: Elsevier; 2019. 1894 p.

3. Carolan M. The politics of Big Data: Corporate agri-food governance meets “weak” resistance. In: Forney J., Rosin C., Campbell H., eds. Agri-environmental governance as an assemblage: Multiplicity, power, and transformation. London: Routledge; 2018:195–212.

4. Altukhov A. Paradigm of food security of the country in modern conditions. Ekonomika sel’skogo khozyaistva Rossii. 2014;(11):4–12. (In Russ.).

5. Engler-Stringer R. Food security. In: Michalos A.C., ed. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag; 2014:2326–2327. DOI: 10.1007/978–94–007–0753–51073

6. Nally D. Against food security: On forms of care and fields of violence. Global Society. 2016;30(4):558–582. DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2016.1158700

7. Smith L.C., Subandoro A. Measuring food security using household expenditure surveys. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2007. 147 p. (Food Security in Practice Technical Guide Series). URL: http://ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/125275/filename/125276.pdf

8. Barbosa G., Gadelha F., Kublik N., Proctor A., Reichelm L., Weissinger E., Wohlleb G., Halden R. Comparison of land, water, and energy requirements of lettuce grown using hydroponic vs. conventional agricultural methods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2015;12(6):6879–6891. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120606879

9. Polzikov D.A. Current state of food security in the Eurasian Economic Union countries. EKO: vserossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = ECO Journal. 2020;(6):67–86. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131–7652–2020–6–67–86

10. Chaudhary A., Gustafson D., Mathys A. Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems. Nature Communications. 2018;9:848. DOI: 10.1038/s41467–018–03308–7

11. Béné C., Prager S.D., Achicanoy H.A.E. et al. Global map and indicators of food system sustainability. Scientific Data. 2019;6:279. DOI: 10.1038/s41597–019–0301–5

12. Nagyová L., Holienčinová M., Rovný P., Dobák D., Bilan Y. Food security drivers: Economic sustainability of primary agricultural production in the Slovak Republic. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues. 2016;6(2):259–274. DOI: 10.9770/jssi.2016.6.2(6)

13. Caponea R., Bottalicoa F., Ottomano G.O. et al. Food systems sustainability, food security and nutrition in the Mediterranean Region: The contribution of the Mediterranean diet. In: Ferranti P., Berry E.M., Anderson J.R., eds. Encyclopedia of food security and sustainability. Amsterdam, Cambridge, MA: Elsevier; 2019;2:176–180. DOI: 10.1016/B 978–0–08–100596-5.21977-X

14. Stevano S., Johnston D., Codjoe E. Better decisions for food security? Critical refl tions on the economics of food choice and decision-making in development economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2020;44(4):813–833. DOI: 10.1093/cje/beaa012

15. Borodin A., Mityushina I. Evaluating the effectiveness of companies using the DEA method. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2020;(6):187–193. DOI: 10.33271/nvngu/20206/187

16. Altukhov A. Territorial and sectoral division of labor in agro-industrial production — the basis for interstate integration in the agrarian sphere of the economy of the Eurasian Economic Union. Agroprodovol’stvennaya politika Rossii = Agro-Food Policy in Russia. 2017;(10):2–10. (In Russ.).

17. Kot S. Buzdalov I. Agrarian relations and agrarian policy in contemporary Russia. APK: Ekonomika, upravlenie. 2017;(1):94–95. (In Russ.).

18. Panaedova G., Kulagovskaya T., Cheprakova T., Yakubova E. Food security problems and imperatives of the North Caucasus macro-region subjects. European Research Studies Journal. 2018;21(1):359–370. DOI: 10.35808/ersj/1186

19. Shagaida N. I., Uzun V. Ya., Gataulina E. A., Saraikin V. A., Yanbykh R. G., Karlova N. A.. Risk assessment of the implementation of the EEA agreement on agriculture for Russia. Moscow: RANEPA; 2015. 95 с. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2624599 (In Russ.).

20. Shagaida N.I., Uzun V. Ya. Food security in Russia: Monitoring, trends, threats. Moscow: Delo; 2015. 110 p. (In Russ.).

21. Shkurenko A. Formation of a common agricultural market in the EU: Lessons for the Eurasian Economic Union. Evraziyskaya ekonomicheskaya integratsiya = Journal of Eurasian Economic Integration. 2015;(4):73–94. (In Russ.).

22. Ksenofontov M., Polzikov D., Gol’denberg I., Sitnikov P. Methodological problems of forming the concept of food security in Russia. Problemy prognozirovaniya = Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2018;(5):127–136. (In Russ.).

23. Ksenofontov M. Yu., Polzikov D.A., Nebreev N.V., Sitnikov P. Food security in Russia: Current state and assessment problems. Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnohozyaystvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN = Scientifi Articles: Institute of Economic Forecasting. Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017;15:11–29. (In Russ.).

24. Vygodchikova I. Yu. Toolkit of decisions making about investment of large Russian companies using hierarchical procedure of ranking and minimax approach. Prikladnaya informatika = Journal of Applied Informatics. 2019;14(6):123–137. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/1993–8314–2019–10054

25. Vygodchikova I. Constructing a rating of the competitiveness of Russian companies. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya = Journal of Modern Competition. 2018;12(2–3):5–17. (In Russ.).