The Impact of Digitalization on the Financial Performance of Russian Companies
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-2-128-142
Abstract
Digitalization is one of the most urgent problems for Russia; companies need to gain a competitive advantage, increase their efficiency and improve business performance. The aim of the study is to identify the relationship between the financial performance of Russian companies and the degree of digitalization of their business processes. Operating profit was chosen as the main financial indicator reflecting the results of the current core activities of the companies. To calculate the digitalization index, McKinsey information data was taken on six parameters: digital marketing, digital product experience, e-commerce, electronic customer relationship management (E-CRM), social networks. The authors used regression analysis of data from 482 companies from 20 industries for the period 2017–2019 as a research method for testing the hypotheses. The findings of the study revealed that the digitalization index has a positive effect on the operational efficiency of companies, but the degree of influence differs depending on the industry, age, and size of the enterprise. The authors concluded that the greatest effect from digitalization is observed among companies with traditionally high digital maturity. These are companies from the financial, technology, or communications industry, where business digitalization is vital and where a slowdown in digital transformation processes can push such enterprises far back in the ranking. Assessing the impact of digitalization of Russian companies on their operational activities will allow the management of companies to choose the right strategy in matters of digital transformation, which will ensure the company’s competitiveness, increase its efficiency and contribute to its development. On a national scale, the results of this study can help decide which industries should be subsidized for digital innovation.
Keywords
JEL: G31; G32; G38
About the Authors
V. A. CherkasovaRussian Federation
Victoria A. Cherkasova — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., School of Finance
Moscow
G. A. Slepushenko
Russian Federation
Georgy A. Slepushenko — analyst, consulting Department
Moscow
References
1. Henriette E., Feki M., Boughzala I. The shape of digital transformation: A systematic literature review. In: Proc. 9th Mediterranean conf. on information systems (MCIS 2015). (Samos, Oct. 3–5, 2015). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems; 2015. URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=mcis2015
2. Fuentelsaz L., Gómez J., Palomas S. The effects of new technologies on productivity: An intrafirm diffusion-based assessment. Research Policy. 2009;38(2):1172–1180. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.04.003
3. Dahlman C., Mealy S. Wermelinger M. Harnessing the digital economy for developing countries. OECD Development Centre Working Paper. 2016;(334). DOI: 10.1787/4adffb24-en
4. Galimova M. P. Readiness of Russian enterprises to digital transformation: Organizational drivers and barriers. Vestnik UGNTU. Nauka, obrazovanie, ekonomika. Seriya: Ekonomika = Bulletin USPTU. Science, Education, Economy. Series: Economy. 2019;(1):27–37. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17122/2541–8904–2019–1–27– 27–37
5. Manyika J., Chui M., Bisson P., Woetzel J., Dobbs R., Bughin J., Aharon D. The Internet of things: Mapping the value beyond the hype. Washington, DC: McKinsey Global Institute; 2015. 144 p. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Technology%20Media%20and%20Telecommunications/High%20Tech/Our%20Insights/The%20Internet%20of%20Things%20The%20value%20of%20digitizing%20the%20physical%20world/The-Internet-of-things-Mapping-the-valuebeyond-the-hype.pdf
6. Wroblewski J. B. Digitalization and firm performance: Are digitally mature firms outperforming their peers? Master of science theses. Lund: Lund University School of Economics and Management; 2018. 80 p. URL: http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8945868&fi
7. McAfee A., Brynjolfsson E. Investing in the IT that makes a competitive difference. Harvard Business Review. 2008;(Jul.-Aug.). URL: https://hbr.org/2008/07/investing-in-the-it-that-makes-a-competitive-difference
8. Fitzgerald M., Kruschwitz N., Bonnet D., Welch M. Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review Research Report. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2013. 13 p. URL: https://www.academia.edu/28433565/Embracing_Digital_Technology_A_New_ Strategic_Imperative
9. Yoo Y. Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quarterly. 2010;34(2):213–231. DOI: 10.2307/20721425
10. Lieberman M. B., Montgomery D. B. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal. 1988;9(S 1):41– 58. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250090706
11. Bouwman H., de Reuver M., Nikou S. The impact of digitalization on business models: How IT artefacts, social media, and Big Data force firms to innovate their business model. In: 14th International Telecommunications Society (ITS) Asia-Pacific Regional Conference: Mapping ICT into transformation for the next information society (Kyoto, June 24–27, 2017). Calgary: International Telecommunications Society; 2017. URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/168475/1/Bouwman-Reuver-Nikou.pdf
12. Barrett M., Walsham G. Electronic trading and work transformation in the London insurance market. Information Systems Research. 1999;10(1):1–22. DOI: 10.1287/isre.10.1.1
13. Scott S.V., Van Reenen J., Zachariadis M. The long-term effect of digital innovation on bank performance: An empirical study of SWIFT adoption in financial services. Research Policy. 2017;46(5):984–1004. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.010
14. Hays C. L. What Wal-Mart knows about customers’ habits. The New York Times. Nov. 14, 2004. URL: https://nyti.ms/2kltC 9B
15. Eistert T., Deighton J., Marcu S., Gordon F., Ullrich M. Banking in a digital world: Insights from leading retail banks worldwide on the state of play and expected challenges in the digital banking journey. Chicago, IL: A. T. Kearney, Inc.; 2013. 21 p. URL: https://www.academia.edu/30677169/Banking_in_a_digital_world_pdf
16. Kessler A. M. Tesla adds high-speed autonomous driving to its bag of tricks. Oct. 15, 2015. The New York Times. URL: https://nyti.ms/2oo15G4 (accessed on 12.05.2017).
17. Van Bommel E., Edelman D., Ungerman K. Digitizing the consumer decision journey. McKinsey & Company. June 01, 2014. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/our-insights/ digitizing-the-consumer-decision-journey (accessed on 11.02.2017).
18. Dobbs R., Koller T., Ramaswamy S., Woetzel J., Manyika J., Krishnan R., Andreula N. Playing to win: The new global competition for corporate profits. Washington, DC: McKinsey Global Institute; 2015. 120 p. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/strategy%20and%20corporate%20finance/our%20insights/the%20new%20global%20competition%20for%20corporate%20 profits/mgi%20global%20competition_full%20report_sep%202015.ashx
19. Bughin J., van Zeebroeck N. The best response to digital disruption. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2017;(Summer). URL: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-right-response-to-digital-disruption/
20. Anderson M. C., Banker R. D., Ravindran S. Value implications of investments in information technology.Management Science. 2006;52(9):1359–1376. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0542
21. Kaufman I., Horton C. Digital transformation: Leveraging digital technology with core values to achieve sustainable business goals. The European Financial Review. 2015;(Dec.-Jan.):63–67. URL: https://www. academia.edu/9964924/Digital_Transformation_
22. Agboola M. G. et al. Effect of digitalization on the performance of commercial banks in Nigeria. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019;331. DOI: 10.1088/1755–1315/331/1/012014
23. Hildebrandt B., Handelt A., Firk S., Kolbe L. M. Entering the digital era — the impact of digital technology-related M&As on business model innovations of automobile OEMs. In: 36th Int. conf. on information systems (ICIS 2015). (Fort Worth, TX, Dec. 13–16, 2015). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems; 2015. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299598625_Entering_the_Digital_Era__The_Impact_of_Digital_Technology-related_MAs_on_Business_Model_Innovations_of_Automobile_OEMs
24. Novák P., Popesko B. Cost variability and cost behavior in manufacturing enterprises. Economics and Sociology. 2015;7(4):89–103. DOI: 10.14254/2071–789X.2014/7–4/6
25. Pervan M., Pervan I., Ćurak M. The influence of age on firm performance: Evidence from the Croatian food industry. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business and Economics. 2017;2017:618681. DOI: 10.5171/2017.618681
26. Coad A., Segarra A. Teruel M. Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2013;24:173–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2012.07.002
27. Babirye S., Niringiye A., Katerega E. Firm size and rate of growth of Ugandan manufacturing firms. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research. 2014;4(3):178–188. URL: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1070.1019&rep=rep1&type=pdf
28. Bentzen J., Madsen E., Smith V. Do firms’ growth rates depend on firm size? Small Business Economics. 2012;39(4):937–947. DOI: 10.1007/s11187–011–9341–8
29. Palestrini A. Analysis of industrial dynamics: A note on the relationship between firms’ size and growth rate. Economics Letters. 2007;94(3):367–371. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.08.021
30. Lam H., Yeung A., Cheng E. The impact of firms’ social media initiatives on operational efficiency and innovativeness. Journal of Operations Management. 2016;47–48:28–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2016.06.001
31. Medovnikov D. S., ed. Digital economy: Global trends and practice of Russian business. Moscow: NRU HSE; 2018. 121 p. (In Russ.).
32. Kousenidis D. V., Negakis C. I., Floropoulos I. N. Size and book-to-market factors in the relationship between average stock returns and average book returns: Some evidence from an emerging market. European Accounting Review. 2000;9(2):225–243. DOI: 10.1080/09638180050129882
33. Charitou A., Clubb C., Andreou A. The effect of earnings permanence, growth, and firm size on the usefulness of cash flows and earnings in explaining security returns: Empirical evidence for the UK. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 2001;28(5–6):563–594. DOI: 10.1111/1468–5957.00385
34. Song H., Zhao C., Zeng J. Can environmental management improve financial performance: An empirical study of A-shares listed companies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;141:1051–1056. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.105
35. Ruiqi W., Wang F., Xu L., Yuan C. R&D expenditures, ultimate ownership and future performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research. 2017;71:47–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.018
Review
For citations:
Cherkasova V.A., Slepushenko G.A. The Impact of Digitalization on the Financial Performance of Russian Companies. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2021;25(2):128-142. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-2-128-142