Problems of Financial Investigation and Recovery of stolen Assets

In the context of the globalization of national economies, the processes of recovering stolen assets are becoming a difficult task, requiring their tracing and detection not only in our country but also in foreign jurisdictions. Not only country’s law enforcement agencies but also corporate governance bodies should play an active role in the process of detecting and recovering stolen assets. In this regard, the improvement of methodological tools that facilitate the tracking, detection and recovery of stolen assets is of scientific and practical interest and ensures the relevance of the study. The purpose of the study is to improve the mechanisms for countering the withdrawal of assets by unscrupulous owners, interest groups. The authors apply methods of dialectical scientific cognition based on a set of recognized private scientific and general scientific methods: formal-logical, comparative-legal, statistical, intersectoral legal analysis. The scientific novelty of the research is the identification of negative factors affecting the volume of stolen assets, their impact on the economic health of the state, private sector, and the improvement of methods for detecting and recovering assets. The results of the study help the authors to identify the main problems of detection and recovery of stolen assets, formulated the directions of the strategy for the return of stolen assets, formalized the processes of tax administration in countering the legalization of illegally obtained property. The recovery of stolen assets is an extremely time-consuming process which requires not only collective action of government agencies but also effective interstate cooperation within the legal framework. The paper presents a comparative analysis of the legislation of a number of countries. The authors identify deficiencies in the Russian law, which does not fully prescribe the procedure for detecting and returning stolen assets to the territory of the country. The authors conclude that in order to improve the mechanisms for countering the withdrawal of assets, it is necessary to apply an integrated approach, improving the legislation of the Russian Federation and fostering collective action of the country’s law enforcement agencies, private sector, and society to successfully confront new challenges and threats. The results of the study may be used to improve the competence of law enforcement officers involved in detecting and returning stolen assets, as well as to develop a more successful methodological and evidence base approach in countering the legalization of illegally obtained property.

1. Kudryashov V. V. International legal aspects of search and return of stolen assets. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya = Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2017;(6):63–72. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/article_5a1e71d771dca5.49181991

2. Dokuchaev A. I., Volevodz A. G. Regulation of return of criminal assets under the laws of England. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal. 2017;(4):282–297. (In Russ.).

3. Avtonomov A. S., Golovanova N. A., Grib V. V., Semykina O. A. Legal and organizational anti-corruption measures: A comparative study. Moscow: Yurist; 2017. 132 p. (In Russ.).

4. Alizade V. A. Circulation of crypto currency in the European Union: On the threshold of legal regulation. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal. 2018;(2):316–327. (In Russ.).

5. Burkina O. A., Ustinov A. A. Confiscation of property as a measure of combating corruption. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2015;(2):119–124.

6. Greenberg T. S., Samuel L. M., Grant W., Gray L. Stolen asset recovery: A good practices guide for non-conviction based asset forfeiture. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications; 2009. 280 p. (Russ. ed.: Greenberg T., Samuel L., Grant W., Gray L. Vozvrat pokhishchennykh aktivov: Rukovodstvo po konfiskatsii aktivov vne ugolovnogo proizvodstva. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2019. 356 p.).

7. Volevodz A. G., Solov’ev A.B. international search, seizure, confiscation and transfer to foreign countries of funds and assets obtained by criminal means, as well as physical evidence. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2007. 440 p. (In Russ.).

8. Glukhov D. V. The current state of legalization (laundering) of funds or other property acquired by criminal means. Molodoi uchenyi = Young Scientist. 2013;(6):543–546. (In Russ.).

9. Izutina S. V. Problems of combating the criminal proceeds’ legalization: Experience and prospects. Ekonomika. Pravo. Obshchestvo = Economics. Law. Society. 2018;(4):69–75. (In Russ.).

10. Wagner B. B., Jacobs L. G. Retooling law enforcement to investigate and prosecute entrenched corruption: Key criminal procedure reforms for Indonesia and other countries. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law. 2008;30(1):183–265. URL: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1138&context=jil (accessed on 28.04.2020).

11. Konovalova O. V., Ageeva L. The essence and content of the phenomenon of corporate fraud in the activities of Russian companies. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. 2020;10(8–1):199–208. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34670/AR.2020.89.30.020

12. Kuznetsova O. A., Stepanov V. V. Inter-branch legal nature of the confiscation. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2018;(2):27–37. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_2_3

13. Nikolaev D. A., Feshina S. S. Foreign experience of legislative regulation in the sphere of reversion of property to the government, in respect of which no information confirming its acquisition for legitimate income has been provided. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. 2020;10(8–1):170–180. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34670/AR.2020.65.43.017

14. Eskindarov M. A., Abramova M. A. et al. The directions of FinTech development in Russia: Expert opinion of the Financial University. Mir novoi ekonomiki = The World of New Economy. 2018;12(2):6–23. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2220–6469–2018–12–2–6–23

15. Chuvakhina L. G. Factors and conditions of illegal export of capital from Russia. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki = News of the Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences. 2016;(1–1):305–314. (In Russ.).

16. Nemtsov Yu. I. Recovery of assets withdrawn from the Russia’s economy and hidden in foreign jurisdictions. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie = Administrative Consulting. 2015;(9):41–46. (In Russ.).

17. Kunev D. A. Modern threats of using cryptocurrencies for criminal purposes. Finansovaya bezopasnost’ = Financial Security. 2018;(20):60–63. (In Russ.).

18. Lapina M. A., Zavyalov M. M. Financial and legal aspects of international cooperation in combating illegal assets movement in foreign jurisdictions. Politseiskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel’nost’ = Police and Investigating Activity. 2020;(2):32–40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25136/2409–7810.2020.2.33328

19. Sharipova L. R. Comparative analysis of property confiscation under the criminal legislation of Russia and foreign countries. Molodoi uchenyi = Young Scientist. 2017;(2):341–345. (In Russ.).

20. Yani P. S. Confiscation of property and criminal liability. Ugolovnoe pravo. 2006;(6):131–135. (In Russ.).

21. Stephenson K. M., Gray L., Power R. et al. Barriers to asset recovery: An analysis of the key barriers and recommendations for action. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2011. 186 p. URL: https://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/Publications/StAR/StAR_Publication_-_Barriers_to_Asset_Recovery.pdf

22. Pelto E., Vahtra P., Liuhto K. Cyp-Rus investment flows to Central and Eastern Europe — Russia’s direct and indirect investments via Cyprus to CEE. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2004;5(1):3–13. DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2004.9636063

23. Gray L., Hansen K., Recica-Kirkbride P., Mills L. Few and far: The hard facts on stolen asset recovery. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank/OECD; 2014. 96 p. URL: https://www.oecd.org/dac/accountable-effective- institutions/Hard%20Facts%20Stolen%20Asset%20Recovery.pdf

24. Márquez H. Americas: Pioneers in the fight against corruption. Inter Press Service. Mar. 26, 1996. URL: http://www.ipsnews.net/1996/03/americas-pioneers-in-the-fight-against-corruption (accessed on 28.04.2020).

25. Larmour P. International action against corruption in the Pacific Islands: Policy transfer, coercion and effectiveness. Asian Journal of Political Science. 2007;15(1):1–16. DOI: 10.1080/02185370701315525

26. Diamond L. Institutions of accountability. Hoover Institution. July 30, 1999. URL: http://www.hoover.org/research/institutions-accountability (accessed on 28.04.2020).

27.