International experience of long-term budget projections: national and subnational levels

The subject of the research is the approaches used in foreign experience in the formation of forecasts of budget parameters for the long term. The study aims to determine the quality criteria for national and regional long-term budget projections based on the best practice of developed countries. In foreign practice, the question of choosing preferable solutions for long-term budget projections remains open. In Russian studies, some of the above issues are highlighted as of the first decade of the 2000s and require updating, and the foreign regional experience on the use of the longterm budget forecasting lacks detailed analyses. This substantiates the relevance of this study. The novelty consists in highlighting the list of “best practices” in implementing long-term fiscal projection for the national and subnational levels based on the study of the experience of foreign countries. To achieve this goal, the author uses methods of a comparative analysis of international experience in building budget forecasts, system analysis, and analogy. As a result, a list of criteria that meet the good practices of developing long-term budget forecasts has been formed. It is proposed to determine the forecasting horizon within 30–50 years, generate forecasts annually or with a specified frequency if there is a mechanism for updating them. The authors conclude that developing forecasts on a scenario basis using the principle of continuity in relation to the estimates obtained and forecasting methodology, as well as assessing the sensitivity of budget parameters to exogenous factors and budget sustainability are necessary characteristics of longterm budget projections. Prospects for the study consist in studying methodological solutions for forecasting budget parameters and developing tools for the regions of the Russian Federation for calculating indicators of long-term budget projections.

1. Woods M. Projecting long-term fscal outcomes. In: Podger A., Su T.-T., Wanna J. et al., eds. Value for money: Budget and fnancial management reform in the People’s Republic of China, Taiwan and Australia. Canberra: ANU Press; 2018:43–63. URL: https://press.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/n4096/pdf/ch03.pdf (accessed on 15.04.2021). DOI: 10.22459/VM.01.2018.03

2. Schick A. Sustainable budget policy: Concepts and approaches. OECD Journal on Budgeting. 2006;5(1):107–126. URL: https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/43481125.pdf (accessed on 15.04.2021).

3. Shakhova G. Ya. Long-term budget planning methodology development specifcs: The international experience. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2009;(2):99–108. (In Russ.).

4. Shakhova G. Ya., Manenok P.L. Long-term budget projections in U.S. federal agencies. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2014;(3):121–133. (In Russ.).

5. Shakhova G. Ya., Kradinov P.G., Manenok P.L. Long-term sustainability of the budget system. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2012;(4):5–18. (In Russ.).

6. Shakhova G. Ya. Modern trends in the methodology of budget forecasting. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2013;(4):61–70. (In Russ.).

7. Anderson B., Sheppard J. Fiscal futures, institutional budget reforms, and their effects: What can be learned? OECD Journal on Budgeting. 2009;(3):7–117. URL: https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/46051529.pdf (accessed on 5.04.2021).

8. Kudrin A.L. Theoretical and methodological approaches to the implementation of a balanced and effective budget policy. Doct. econ. sci. diss. Moscow: RANEPA; 2018. 424 p. URL: https://www.ranepa.ru/upload/iblock/b84/kudrin-a-l-dissertation.pdf (accessed on 15.06.2021). (In Russ.).

9. Goryunov E.L. Assessment of the long-term sustainability of fiscal policy in Russia using the budget gap indicator. Cand. econ. sci. diss. Moscow: RANEPA; 2021. 186 p. URL: https://www.ranepa.ru/upload/iblock/aa7/goryunov-e-l-dissertation.pdf (accessed on 15.06.2021). (In Russ.).

10. Allenov Yu.A., Kradinov P.G., Shakhova G. Ya. Long-term fnancial plan: Regional level development. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2011;(4):97–108. (In Russ.).

11. Arlashkin I. Yu., Deryugin A. N., Proka K.A. Development of long-term budget outlook: Regional aspect. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2015;(3):63–74. (In Russ.).

12. Semibratskii M.V. Development of the budgetary strategy of the region: Theoretical and applied aspects. Cand. econ. sci. diss. Belgorod: Belgorod National Research University; 2015. 175 p. (In Russ.).

13. Guillemette Y., Turner D. The fscal projection framework in long-term scenarios economics. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. 2017;(1440). URL: https://www.oecd.org/offcialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ECO/WKP(2017)72&docLanguage=En (accessed on 27.04.2021).

14. Ulla P. Assessing fscal risks through long-term budget projections. OECD Journal on Budgeting. 2006;6(1):127–187. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227461781_Assessing_Fiscal_Risks_through_Long-Term_Budget_Projections (accessed on 2.05.2021).

15. Horne J. Indicators of fscal sustainability. IMF Working Paper. 1991;(5). URL: https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1991/005/article-A001-en.xml

16. Blanchard O., Chouraqui J.-C., Hangemann R., Sartor N. The sustainability of fscal policy: New answers to an old question. OECD Economic Studies. 1990;(15):7–36. URL: https://www.oecd.org/tax/public-fnance/34288870.pdf