Income and wealth distribution in the European Union and Russia: comparativ analysis

The subject of the study is the features of economic relations between income and wealth distribution/redistribution in Europe and Russia from the perspective of the need to overcome excessive socio-economic inequality. The aim of the article is to determine the level of existing socio-economic inequality, to make cross-country comparisons of income and wealth differentials in society, and then to substantiate the possibilities of applying the best practices of foreign countries to reduce socio-economic inequality in Russia. The methods of research are philosophical (dialectical, critical), general scientific (methods of scientific abstraction, the unity of the historical and logical, analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, analogy, classification), private scientific (economic and mathematical, statistical, functional). The theoretical significance of the study lies in the development of the theory and methodology of A. Ya. Kiruta and A. Yu. Shevyakov on excessive inequality. The recommendations proposed by the authors to reduce excessive inequality in Russia represent the practical significance. The study shows that the EU countries, which are characterized by smooth income distribution, are extremely unequal in wealth distribution. The Russian economy has excessive levels of inequality in terms of both income and wealth. At the same time, there is a polarization of Russian society and a concentration of income in the hands of the upper percipient. The Gini coefficient, the Kaitz index, and the ratio of median and minimum wages demonstrate the extreme degree of inequality in income distribution among Russians. The research investigates the losses from existing levels of inequality in the EU countries and Russia through changes in human development indices. The authors conclude that socio-economic policy aimed at reducing excessive inequality in Russia should be based on the principle of social federalism. Russia needs a comprehensive strategy to combat social stratification and a consistent policy aimed at the formation of a full-fledged middle class. The authors consider it necessary to introduce in Russia a non-taxable minimum income tax, a progressive scale of gift and inheritance taxes, and the introduction of a new wealth tax.

1. Milanovic B. Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2016. 299 р.

2. Kormishkin E. D., Kormishkina L.A., Koloskov D.A. The phenomenon of socio-economic inequality: A view in the context of the neo-industrial paradigm of modern development. Saransk: Mordovia State Pedagogical University; 2020. 202 p. (In Russ.).

3. Stiglitz J. E. People, power, and profits: Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., Inc.; 2019. 366 p. (Russ. ed.: Stiglitz J. Lyudi, vlast’ i pribyl’: Progressivnyi kapitalizm v epokhu massovogo nedovol’stva. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2020. 430 p.).

4. Rousseau J.J. Du contrat social; ou, Principes du droit politique. Amsterdam: Chez Marc-Michel Rey; 1762. 342 p. (Russ. ed.: Rousseau J.J. Ob obshchestvennom dogovore ili printsipy politicheskogo prava. Moscow: Urait; 2020. 146 p.).

5. Rousseau J. J. Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes. Amsterdam: Chez MarcMichel Rey; 1755. 288 p. (Russ. ed. Rousseau J. J. Razsuzhdeniya o nachale i osnovanii neravenstva mezhdu lyud’mi. Moscow: N. Novikov Univ. Print.; 1782. 308 p. URL: https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01003338086#?page=1 (accessed on 02.02.2021).

6. Pososhkov I. T. The book of poverty and wealth and other writings. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences; 1951. 413 p. (In Russ.).

7. Marx K. The capital. Transl. from German. Moscow: Gospolitizdat; 1955. 2230 p. (In Russ.).

8. Engels F. Die Entwicklung des Sozialismus von der Utopie zur Wissenschaft. Hottingen, Zürich: Druck der Schweizerischen Genossenschaftdruckerei; 1882. 88 p. (Russ. ed.: Engels F. Razvitie sotsializma ot utopii k nauke. Moscow: Gospolitizdat; 1960. 80 p.).

9. Wright E. O. Classes. London: Verso, 1985. 330 p. URL: https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/selected-publishedwritings.htm#classes (дата обращения: 02.02.2021).

10. Kuznets S. Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review. 1955;45(1):1–28. URL: https://assets.aeaweb.org/asset-server/files/9438.pdf (accessed on 02.02.2021).

11. Kuznets S. Modern economic growth: Finding and reflections. The American Economic Review. 1973:63(3):247–258. URL: http://www.piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Kuznets1973.pdf (accessed on 02.02.2021).

12. Ermakova E. R. Socio-economic disparities as a result of imperfect redistribution processes. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ = National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2018;14(7):1235–1250. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/ni.14.7.1235

13. Piketty Th. Le capital au XXIe siecle. Paris: Éditions du Seuil; 2013. 976 p. (Russ. ed.: Piketty Th. Kapital v XXI veke. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 2015. 592 p.).

14. Zukman G. The hidden wealth of nations: The scourge of tax havens. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press; 2015. 200 p.

15. Saez E., Zukman G. Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2016;131(2):519–578. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjw004

16. Piketty T. Capital and ideology / Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard university press, 2020. 1067 p.

17. Sachs J. D. The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. New York: Penguin Books; 2006. 448 p. (Russ. ed.: Sachs J. D. Konets bednosti: Ekonomicheskie vozmozhnosti nashego vremeni. Moscow: Gaydar Institute Publ.; 2011. 424 p.).

18. Krugman P. Why we are in a new gilded age? The New York Times. May 08, 2014.

19. Stiglitz J. E. The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Co. Publ.; 2012. 560 p. (Russ. ed.: Stiglitz J. E. Tsena neravenstva. Chem rassloenie obshchestva grozit nashemu budushchemu. Moscow: Eksmo; 2015. 512 p.).

20. Stiglitz J.E., Sen A., Fitoussi J.-P. Mis-measuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. The report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. New York, London: The New Press; 2010. 176 p. (Russ. ed.: Stiglitz J.E., Sen A., Fitoussi J.-P. Neverno otsenivaya nashu zhizn’: Pochemu VVP ne imeet smysla? Doklad Komissii po izmereniyu effektivnosti ekonomiki i sotsial’nogo progressa. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ.; 2016. 216 p.).

21. Shevyakov A. Yu., Kiruta A. Ya. Measuring economic inequality. Moscow: Leto; 2002. 316 p. (In Russ.).

22. Agangebyan A. G. On social policy priorities. Moscow: Delo; 2020. 512 p. (In Russ.).

23. Glaz’ev S. Yu. Economy and society. Moscow: Prospekt; 2021. 192 p. (In Russ.).

24. Alesina A., Perotti R. Income distribution, political instability, and investment. European Economic Review. 1996;40(6):1203–1228. DOI: 10.1016/0014–2921(95)00030–5

25. Kostyleva L. V. Population inequality in Russia: Trends, factors, regulation. Vologda: RAS Institute for Socio-Economic Development of Territories; 2011. 223 p. (In Russ.).

26. Gini C. Le medie. Torino: UTET; 1958. 512 p. (Russ. ed.: Gini C. Srednie velichiny. Moscow: Statistika; 1970. 447 p.).

27. Salmina A. Comparative analysis of inequality indicators: Characteristics and application. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economy. 2019;(7):35–58. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760005832–4

28. Ermakova E. R. Progressive tax as a requirement for the sustainability of the national systems of income distribution. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ = National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2019;15(9):1604–1616. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/ni.15.9.1604

29. Ilyakova I. E., Lizina O. M., Sausheva O. S. Juvenile potential as a social resource for economic development in a changing technological order. Regionologiya = Regionology: Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2020;28(4):638–665. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15507/2413–1407.113.028.202004.638–665