The Armey curve: an empirical analysis of selected Balkan countries and Russia for the period 2006–2019
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-1-55-65
Abstract
The subject of the analysis is to check the validity of the Armey curve which is frequently used in the scientific literature and to establish the optimal level of the public sector. The aim of the present study is to analyze the impact of the public sector through public expenditure on the possibility of achieving economic growth. The estimation is based on annual data for the period 2006–2019 of selected Balkan countries and Russia. The authors apply the ordinary least squares (OLS) method for a nonlinear regression model. The conclusion is that the Armey curve is valid for some of the countries involved in the research among which Serbia, North Macedonia and Russia. The public expenditure to Gross Domestic Product ratio’s threshold value, which maximizes economic growth, ranges from 32.94 to 42.37%. The average share of public expenditure in the analyzed countries is approximately equal to the threshold values that are obtained which is indicative of achievement to some extent the desired economic performance. However, the results of the study show that the growth of the public sector and its impact on economic development should not be underestimated.
Supporting agencies: This work was supported by the UNWE Research Programme (Research Grant No. 4/2020) under research project “Problems and Challenges of Fiscal Policy in the Balkan Region Countries”. University of National and World Economy (UNWE), Sofia, Bulgaria.
About the Authors
V. N. Nikolova
University of National and World Economy (UNWE)
Bulgaria
Bulgaria
Velichka N. Nikolova — PhD in Economics, Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of General Economics
Sofia
A. G. Angelov
University of National and World Economy (UNWE)
Bulgaria
Bulgaria
Angel G. Angelov — PhD in Economics, Lecturer, Department of Finance, Finance and Accountancy Faculty
Sofia
References
1. Jiranyakul K., Brahmasrene T. The relationship between government expenditures and economic growth in Thailand. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. MPRA Paper. 2007;(88426). URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/88426/1/MPRA_paper_88426.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2021).
2. Arpaia A., Turrini A. Government expenditure and economic growth in the EU: Long-run tendencies and short-term adjustment. European Economy. Economic Papers. 2008;(300). DOI: 10.2765/22776
3. Alam S., Sultana A., Butt M. S. Does social expenditures promote economic growth? A multivariate panel cointegration analysis for Asian countries. European Journal of Social Sciences. 2010;14(1):44–54.
4. Baffes J., Shah A. Productivity of public spending, sectoral allocation choices, and economic growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 1993;(1178). URL: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/115241468740958853/pdf/multi0page.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2021).
5. Devarajan Sh., Swaroop V., Zou H. The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1996;37(2):313–344. DOI: 10.1016/S0304–3932(96)90039–2
6. Afonso A., Furceri D. Government size composition, volatility and economic growth. ECB Working Paper Series. 2008;(849). URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/153283/1/ecbwp0849.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2021).
7. Barro R. J. A cross-country study of growth, saving, and government. In: Bernheim B.D., Shoven J. B., eds. National saving and economic performance. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press; 1991:271–304. URL: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c5994/c5994.pdf. (accessed on 11.07.2021).
8. Scully G. What is the optimal size of government in the United States? NCPA Policy Report. 1994;(188). URL: http://www.ncpathinktank.org/pdfs/st188.pdf
9. Armey D. The freedom revolution: The new Republican House majority leader tells why big government failed, why freedom works, and how we will rebuild America. 1 st ed. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing; 1995. 318 p.
10. Forte F., Magazzino C. Optimal size government and economic growth in EU countries. Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics. 2011;28(3):295–322. DOI: 10.1428/35913
11. Nuţă A. C., Nuţă F. M., Chirilă V., Roman A., Puşcă A. C. Testing the relationship between public expenditure and economic growth in Romania. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica. 2015;11(4):86–102. URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/2935/2711 (accessed on 11.07.2021).
12. Navarro C. Optimal government size and economic growth in Spain. Evidences through the Armey curve (1980-2016). Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal. 2019;6(12):140–146. DOI: 10.14738/assrj.612.7524
13. Mavrov H. The size of government expenditure and the rate of economic growth in Bulgaria. Economic Alternatives. 2007;(1):53–63. URL: https://www.unwe.bg/uploads/Alternatives/A06_01.2007.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2021).
14. Altunc O. F., Aydin C. The relationship between optimal size of government and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;92:66–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.639
15. Yüksel C. The size of the public sector and the Armey curve: The case of Turkey. In: Gerçek A., Taş M., eds. Critical debates in public finance. Berlin: Peter Lang GmbH; 2019:137–154. URL: http://cihanyuksel.org/kitap_bolumu_2019_1.pdf
16. De Witte K., Moesen W. Sizing the government. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. MPRA Paper. 2009;(14785). URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14785/1/MPRA_paper_14785.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2021)
17. Iyidogan P.V., Turan T. Government size and economic growth in Turkey: A threshold regression analysis. Prague Economic Papers. 2017;26(2):142–154. DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.600
18. Lupu D., Asandului M. The nexus between economic growth and public spending in Eastern European countries. Inžinerinė Ekonomika = Engineering Economics. 2017;28(2): 155–161. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.28.2.7734
19. Bozma G., Başar S., Eren M. Investigating validation of Armey curve hypothesis for G7 countries using ARDL model. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 2019;20(1):49–59. DOI: 10.31671/dogus.2019.416
20. Vedder R.K, Gallaway L. E. Government size and economic growth. Washington, DC: Joint Economic Committee; 1998. URL: https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/014ee573-5f0d-45e5-8cc0-869a465c7b36/government-size-and-economic-growth---dec-1998.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2021).
21. Herath Sh. The size of the government and economic growth: An empirical study of Sri Lanka. SRE-Discussion Papers. 2010;(05). URL: https://epub.wu.ac.at/2962/1/sre-disc-2010_05.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2021).
22. Alimi R. S. Does optimal government size exist for developing economies? The case of Nigeria. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. MPRA Paper. 2014;(56073). URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/56073/1/MPRA_paper_56073.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2021).
23. Ahmad R., Othman N. Optimal size of government and economic growth in Malaysia: Empirical evidence. In: Prosiding Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia ke-9 (PERKEM ke-9) “Urus Tadbir Ekonomi yang Adil: Ke Arah Ekonomi Berpendapatan Tinggi” (Kuala Terengganu, Okt. 17–19, 2014). Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; 2014:41–48. URL: https://www.ukm.my/fep/perkem/pdf/perkem2014/PERKEM_2014_1B2.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2021).
24. Facchini F., Melki M. Optimal government size and economic growth in France (1871–2008): An explanation by the state and market failures. CES Working Papers. 2011;(77). URL: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00654363/document
25. Attinasi M.G, Klemm A. The growth impact of discretionary fiscal policy measure. ECB Working Paper Series. 2014;(1697). URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1697.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2021).
26. Boldeanu F. T., Tache I., Ion M.-S. The impact of fiscal policy on economic growth in the countries of Eastern Europe. Revista Economica. 2015;67(5):16–32. URL: http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.economica/archive/67502boldeanu&tache&ion.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2021).
Review
For citations:
Nikolova V.N., Angelov A.G. The Armey curve: an empirical analysis of selected Balkan countries and Russia for the period 2006–2019. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(1):55-65. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-1-55-65
Views:
912
Email this article 