Fiscal effects of applying initiative budgeting methodology in public finance

The subject of the research is the methodology and practice of initiative budgeting (the Russian term for participatory budgeting) as applied to taxation. The relevance of the study is explained by the fact that the experience accumulated in Russia allows us to speak about the productivity of the initiative budgeting methodology in relation to other areas of public finance. The initiative budgeting methodology is part of a more general theory of citizens’ participation in governance and budget decision-making, which is being formed in Russian and foreign studies. The article aims to study the emergence of fiscal effects of applying the methodology of initiative budgeting in public finance and to develop proposals on this basis aimed at finding reserves for increasing local budget revenues. To formulate conclusions and recommendations, the authors use methods such as content analysis of scientific publications on the development of participatory budgeting practices abroad and logical generalization. The study substantiates that one of the promising practices of initiative budgeting may be the participation of citizens in decision-making on the allocation of part of the expenditures of local budgets to co-finance projects of initiative budgeting. At the same time, additional positive effects appear in the form of increased motivation for collection and an overall increase in the volume of local taxes and fees. Thus, there is a productive integration of the initiative budgeting methodology and tax policy at the local level. The authors propose possible strategies for introducing an initiative budgeting experiment in Russian regions. The authors conclude that the initiative budgeting methodology allows creating ways to motivate local governments and citizens to increase local budget revenues. There is a prospect of expanding the scope of application of initiative budgeting tools to solve the financial problems of municipalities.

1. Belenchuk A.A., Vagin V.V., Shul’ga I.E. Initatiive budgeting as a tool for improving the efficiency of budget spending. Finansy = Finance. 2017;(8):10-21. (In Russ.).

2. Fedosov V.A., Bogatchenko V.V. Financial mechanism of participatory budgeting in the Russian Federation. Nauchno-issledovatel’skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Research Financial Institute. Financial Journal. 2019;(3):117-127. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2019-3-117-127

3. Cabannes Y. Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization. 2004;16(1):27-46. DOI: 10.1177/095624780401600104

4. Pommerehne W.W., Weck-Hannemann H. Tax rates, tax administration and income tax evasion in Switzerland. Public Choice. 1996;88(1-2):161-170. DOI: 10.1007/BF00130416

5. Schneider A., Baquero M. Get what you want, give what you can: Embedded public finance in Porto Alegre. IDS Working Paper. 2006;(266). URL: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/4058/Wp266.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

6. Zamboni Y. Participatory budgeting and local governance: An evidence-based evaluation of participatory budgeting experiences in Brazil., University of Bristol. Working Paper. 2007. URL: https://pria-academy.org/pdf/3-Zamboni.pdf

7. Torgler B., Schneider F. The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2009;30(2):228-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2008.08.004

8. Touchton M., Wampler B., Peixoto T. Of governance and revenue: Participatory institutions and tax compliance in Brazil. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2019;(8797). URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/31492/WPS8797.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

9. Sjoberg F.M., Mellon J., Peixoto T., Hemker J., Tsai L.L. Voice and punishment: A global survey experiment on tax morale. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2019;(8855). URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/31713/WPS8855.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y

10. Pinskaya M.R., Kireenko A.P. Laboratory experiment in the study of the problem of tax evasion: The meaning and methodology of the study. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Taxes and Taxation. 2017;(7):56-66. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/2454-065X.2017.7.23846

11. Feld L., Frey B. Deterrence and tax morale: How tax administrations and taxpayers interact. OECD Papers. 2003;3. URL: https://www.oecd.org/tax/administration/2789923.pdf

12. Allegretti G., Stortone S. Participatory budgets in Italy: Reconfiguring a collapsed panorama. In: Hope for democracy: 25 Years of participatory budgeting worldwide. São Brás De Alportel: In Loco Association; 2014:313-323.

13. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values. 2005;30(2):251-290. DOI: 10.1177/0162243904271724

14. Pinskaya M., Vagin V., Loginova T., Prokaev M. Increase of tax revenues of local budgets due to participatory budgeting. Belorusskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Belarusian Economic Journal. 2020;(4):117-127. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.46782/1818-4510-2020-4-117-127

15. Shybalkina I., Bifulco R. Does participatory budgeting change the share of public funding to low income neighborhoods? Public Budgeting & Finance. 2019;39(1):45-66. DOI: 10.1111/pbaf.12212

16. Baiocchi G. Militants and citizens: The politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press; 2005. 248 p.

17. Touchton M., Wampler B. Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies. 2014;47(10):1442-1469. DOI: 10.1177/0010414013512601