The Impact of Corporate Governance on the Capital Structure of Domestic Companies
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-2-25-37
Abstract
The choice of the optimal capital structure is one of the biggest challenges that the company’s top management faces due to the fact that the right strategy secures the company’s financial stability, sustainable development and capital-raising potential. This study aims at establishing a connection between the capital structure of Russian companies and corporate governance. Literature background of the paper consists of foreign and Russian authors’ works in the field of behavioral finance. Observations from 60 Russian companies were employed in the study. The major findings obtained by economic and mathematical modeling are as follows: 1. positive connection was established between the size of board of directors, number of independent directors and debt in capital structure; 2. positive connection between CEO’s age and short-term debt in capital structure; 3. no correlation between gender of directors and debt. The findings of this study may be used for determining the optimal capital structure strategy. Moreover, this information may be taken into account by top-management, directors, etc. for internal valuation of a company’s operations including sound valuation of the corporate governance factors that influenced the company’s capital structure.
About the Authors
E. A. FedorovaRussian Federation
Elena A. Fedorova — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor at the Corporate Finance and Governance Department.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
V. G. Komletsova
Russian Federation
Varvara G. Komletsova — Employee.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
M. K. Tregubova
Russian Federation
Mariya K. Tregubova — Employee.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
A. Yu. Maksimova
Russian Federation
Anna Yu. Maksimova — Employee.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
V. D. Emel’yanova
Russian Federation
Viktoriya D. Emel’yanova — Employee.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
References
1. Orlova S., Harper J.T., Sun L. Determinants of capital structure complexity. Journal of Economics and Business. 2020;110:105905. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2020.105905
2. Cronqvist H., Makhija A.K., Yonker S.E. Behavioral consistency in corporate finance: CEO personal and corporate leverage. Journal of Financial Economics. 2013;103(1):20–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.08.005
3. Allport G.W. Traits revisited. American Psychologist. 1966;21(1):1–10. DOI: 10.1037/h0023295
4. Funder D.C., Colvin C.R. Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;60(5):773–794. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.60.5.773
5. Rusanova Е.Т. Review of modern research on the theory of capital structure. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2009;(38):63–72. (In Russ.).
6. Popov М.V. Formation of the target capital structure from the standpoint of modern economic thought. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovation & Investment. 2021;(3):53–55. (In Russ.).
7. Liu Y., Jiraporn P. The effect of CEO power on bond ratings and yields. Journal of Empirical Finance. 2010;17(4):744–762. DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2010.03.003
8. Tychinskaya T.A. Corporate governance as a factor of financing investment sources structure. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Obshchestvennye nauki. 2010;(1):46–58. (In Russ.).
9. Peni E. CEO and chairperson characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance. 2014;18(1):185–205. DOI: 10.1007/s10997–012–9224–7
10. Kraus A., Litzenberger R.H. A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. The Journal of Finance. 1973;28(4):911–922. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–6261.1973.tb01415.x
11. Myers S.C. The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance. 1984;39(3):574–592. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–6261.1984.tb03646.x
12. Ermakova Yu.S., Krasyuk V.A. Models for formation of capital structure. Sfera uslug: innovatsii i kachestvo = Services Sector: Innovation and Quality. 2018;(39):29–44. (In Russ.).
13. Grossman S.J., Hart O.D. Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives. In: McCall J.J., ed. The economics of information and uncertainty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1982:107–140. (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report).
14. Gaitán S., Herrera-Echeverri H., Pablo E., How corporate governance affects productivity in civil-law business environments: Evidence from Latin America. Global Finance Journal. 2018;37:173–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2018.05.004
15. Le T.P.V., Tannous K. Ownership structure and capital structure: A study of Vietnamese listed firms. Australian Economic Papers. 2016;55(4):319–344. DOI: 10.1111/1467–8454.12089
16. Prommin P., Jumreornvong S., Jiraporn P., Tong S. Liquidity, ownership concentration, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from Thailand. Global Finance Journal. 2016:31:73–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2016.06.006
17. Cox T.H., Lobel S.A., McLeod P.L. Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal. 1991;34(4):827–847. DOI: 10.2307/256391
18. Liu Y., Wei Z., Xie F. Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance. 2014;28:169–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016
19. Zelechowski D.D., Bilimoria D. Characteristics of women and men corporate inside directors in the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2004;12(3):337–342. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–8683.2004.00374.x
20. Graham J.R., Harvey C.R. The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics. 2001;60(2–3):187–243. DOI: 10.1016/S0304–405X(01)00044–7
21. Barros L., Silveira A. Overconfidence, managerial optimism and the determinants of capital structure. Brazilian Review of Finance. 2008;6(3):293–335.
22. Bertrand M., Schoar A. Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2003;118(4):1169–1208. DOI: 10.1162/003355303322552775
23. Jiraporn P., Chintrakarn P., Liu Y. Capital structure, CEO dominance, and corporate performance. Journal of Financial Services Research. 2012;42(3):139–158. DOI: 10.1007/s10693–011–0109–8
24. Serfling M.A. CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2014;25:251–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.013
25. Mak Y.T., Kusnadi Y. Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2005;13(3):301–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.09.002
26. Weisbach M.S. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics. 1988;20:431–460. DOI: 10.1016/0304–405X(88)90053–0
27. Vo M.T. Capital structure and cost of capital when prices affect real investments. Journal of Economics and Business. 2021;113:105944. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2020.105944
28. Chang C., Chen X., Liao G. What are the reliably important determinants of capital structure in China? PacificBasin Finance Journal. 2014;30:87–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2014.06.001
Review
For citations:
Fedorova E.A., Komletsova V.G., Tregubova M.K., Maksimova A.Yu., Emel’yanova V.D. The Impact of Corporate Governance on the Capital Structure of Domestic Companies. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(2):25-37. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-2-25-37