Imperatives for Transformation of the International Monetary System in the Conditions of Multipolarity

The neoliberal model of globalization promoted the outstripping growth of financial assets over the development of the real sector. The functioning of the international monetary system (IMS), based on one key national currency — the US dollar, has led to the financialization of the world economy and the formation of global imbalances. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the need to replace US-centric financial institutions with new institutions at the regional level and to transform the IMS in the direction of monetary polycentrism and regionalization. The paper discusses the mutual responsibility of the core and periphery countries for the formation of global imbalances. The financial and economic indicators of sovereign states, transnational companies and transnational banks are compared according to the “scale” of globalization. The study shows chronic disproportions between the dynamics of global capital growth and economic growth rates, leading to the state’s loss of control over the reproduction process. It is substantiated that the current transformation of the IMS in the direction of monetary polycentrism and regionalization is a natural reaction to these imbalances. The article reveals a negative relationship between the implementation of procyclical and anti-crisis monetary policies by the central banks of developed countries and the competitive positions of developing countries in international financial and commodity markets. The factors of using the oligopoly of the Big Three credit rating agencies as a “soft power” to maintain the US global hegemony and the status of the US dollar as a key reserve currency are systematized. The author concludes that in order for developing countries to form their own international liquidity, it is necessary to stimulate the internationalization of their currencies by developing pan-Asian financial institutions and encouraging competition between them and the existing institutions of the IMS.

1. Yakovlev P. P. Risks of a global recession in the face of globalization crisis. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2020;64(2):5–14. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131–2227–2020–64–2–5–14

2. Shamakhov V.A., Mezhevich N.M. Globalization 3.0 or new regionalization: Towards the phasing of world development. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie = Administrative Consulting. 2021;(3):10–15. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/1726–1139–2021–3–10–15

3. Izotov D. A. Economic integration in the context of globalization and regionalization. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik = Russian Foreign Economic Journal. 2021;(5):7–24. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2072–8042–2021–5–7–24

4. Kuznetsov D. Network texture of world politics: Transregionalism of BRICS. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2020;64(11):124–131. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131–2227–2020–64–11–124–131

5. Lebedeva M.M., Kuznetsov D.A. Transregional integration as a new phenomenon of world politics: Nature and prospects. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya = Polis. Political Studies. 2019;(5):71–84. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.05.06

6. Krylova L.V. International currency competitiveness: Strengths and weaknesses of the US dollar. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya = Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management. 2020;(10):24–35. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.46486/0234–4505–2020–10–24–35

7. Polivach A.P. International role of euro and European integration. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2020;64(5):33–41. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131–2227–2020–64–5–33–41

8. Shchegoleva N. G., Malsagova R. G. Transformation of the role of the euro in the modern world currency system. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya = Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management. 2020;(11):44–64. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.46486/0234–4505–2020–11–44–64

9. Pishchik V. Ya. Features of the EU authorities’ measures to restore the economy and maintain the competitiveness of the euro in the context of the COVID‑19 pandemic. Bankovskie uslugi = Banking Services. 2021;(4):2–8. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.36992/2075–1915_2021_4_2

10. Kuznetsov A.V. Institutional barriers to currency competition in the international monetary system. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2019;25(10):2341–2358. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/ fc. 25. 10.2341

11. Kolganov A.I. The evolution of money as a point of the evolution of financial capital. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2019;(8):67–84. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2019–8–67–84

12. Murau S. Offshore dollar creation and the emergence of the post‑2008 international monetary system. Potsdam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies; 2018. 47 р. (IASS Discussion Paper). DOI: 10.2312/iass.2018.009

13. Murau S., Rini J., Haas A. The future of offshore dollar creation: Four scenarios for the international monetary system by 2040. Potsdam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies; 2018. 44 р. (IASS Discussion Paper). DOI: 10.2312/iass.2018.008

14. Burlachkov V.K. Monetary mechanisms of the global and national economies. Moscow: Lenand; 2019. 256 p. (In Russ.).

15. Soros G. Crisis of global capitalism: Open society endangered. New York: Public Affairs; 1998. 288 p.

16. Eichengreen B. Global imbalances and the lessons of Bretton Woods. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2006. 208 p. (The Cairoli Lectures).

17. Piketty T. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2014. 696 p.

18. Lancu A. et al. Reserve currencies in an evolving international monetary system. International Monetary Fund Departmental Paper. 2020;(002). URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/DepartmentalPapers-Policy-Papers/Issues/2020/11/17/Reserve-Currencies-in-an-Evolving-International-MonetarySystem-49864 (accessed on 29.07.2021).

19. Janus J. The COVID-19 shock and long-term interest rates in emerging market economies. Finance Research Letters. 2021;43:101976. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.101976

20. Friedman T. L. Don’t mess with Moody’s. The New York Times. Feb. 22, 1995. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/1995/02/22/opinion/foreign-affairs-don-t-mess-with-moody-s.html (accessed on 29.07.2021).

21. Yalta A. T., Yalta A. Y. Are credit rating agencies regionally biased? Economic Systems. 2018;42(4):682–694. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2018.08.001

22. Haspolat F. B. Analysis of Moody’s sovereign credit ratings: Criticisms towards rating agencies are still valid? Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015;30:283–293. DOI: 10.1016/S2212–5671(15)01296–4

23. Toscano F. Does the Dodd-Frank Act reduce the confl ict of interests of credit rating agencies? Journal of Corporate Finance. 2020;62:101595. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfi n.2020.101595

24. Ioannou S., Wójcik D., Pažitka V. Financial centre bias in sub-sovereign credit ratings. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2021;70:101261. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101261

25. Marandola G. InkLocal credit rating agencies: A new dataset. Research in International Business and Finance. 2016;38(9):83–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.03.006

26. Hu X., Shi J., Wang L., Yu J. Foreign ownership in Chinese credit ratings industry: Information revelation or certifi cation? Journal of Banking and Finance. 2020;118:105891. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105891