Debt Sustainability Assessment of Regional Budgets

The aim of the paper is to assess the debt sustainability of the budget system of the regions of the Northwestern Federal District (NWFD) of Russia and establish differentiated values of the budget constraints. The author uses methods of comparison and grouping, correlation and cluster analysis. The author’s methodology based on the methods of multivariate statistical analysis made it possible to include indicators that have the nature of leading indicators in the assessment, evaluate the integral indicator of debt sustainability, and determine the limit values of these indicators. Approbation of the author’s methodology for assessing the debt sustainability of the budget system on the statistics of the NWFD regions allowed dividing the regions into three clusters according to the types of debt sustainability and determining the threshold values of indicators for each cluster. The research results substantiate the need to reduce the high debt burden for 70% of the NWFD regions. The results indicate that the regions with a high level of debt sustainability include St. Petersburg, Leningrad and Kaliningrad regions. The integral indicator of debt sustainability of these regions is greater than one and the regions are well grouped according to six indicators of debt sustainability into a group that is homogeneous in terms of characteristics. The Republic of Komi, the Republic of Karelia, and the Arkhangelsk and Pskov regions have a low level of debt sustainability: the standard limiting values for the “debt-to-GRP ratio” indicator of the regions is less than 5%, and the “debt-to-revenue ratio” indicator — less than 42%, the value of all indicators of debt sustainability exceeds the values of the cluster centroids. For these regions, the author recommends pursuing a targeted budget policy with a mandatory debt reduction to the level of threshold values for the indicators of the regions of this cluster. The paper concludes that it is necessary to reduce the debt burden of most regions of the NWFD, as well as to establish differentiated values of budget constraint on public debt, taking into account the indicators of socio-economic development of these regions.

1. Sanginova L.D. Efficient debt policy of the Russian Federation subjects: Theory and practice. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2018;11(1):96–105. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999–849X 2018–11–1–96–105

2. Rogatenyuk E.V. Indicative analysis of a debt security of the Russian Federation. Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imebi V.I. Vernadskogo. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Economics and Management. 2018;4(2):123–134. (In Russ.).

3. Galukhin A.V. Assessment of debt sustainability of budgets of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya = Territorial Development Issues. 2016;(5):6. (In Russ.).

4. Zotova A.I., Kirichenko M.V. The stability of the financial system of the region: Essence, factors, indicators. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya = Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2017;(5):76–82. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2017.5.19

5. Checherita-Westphal C., Hughes Hallett A., Rother P. Fiscal sustainability using growth-maximizing debt targets. Applied Economics. 2014;46(6):638–647. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2013.861590

6. Vavilov A., Kovalishin E. The principles of state debt policy. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2001;(8):46–64.

7. Kleiner G.B. State — region — field — enterprise: Framework of economics system stability of Russia. Part 2. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region. 2015;(3):9–17. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/2015–3–1

8. Kluza K. Sustainability of local government sector debt. Evidence from Monte-Carlo simulations. Lex Localis. 2016;1(1):115–132. DOI: 10.4335/14.1.115–132(2016)

9. Bröthaler J., Getzner M., Haber G. Sustainability of local government debt: A case study of Austrian municipalities. Empirica. 2015;42(3):521–546. DOI: 10.1007/s10663–014–9261–3

10. Zhao R., Tian Y., Lei A., Boadu F., Ren Z. The effect of local government debt on regional economic growth in China: A nonlinear relationship approach. Sustainability. 2019;11(11):3065. DOI: 10.3390/su11113065

11. Checherita-Westphal C., Rother P. The impact of high government debt on economic growth and its channels: An empirical investigation for the euro Area. European Economic Review. 2012;56(7):1392–1405. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.06.007

12. Joy J., Panda P.K. An empirical analysis of sustainability of public debt among BRICS nations. Journal of Public Affairs. 2021;21(2):112–126. DOI: 10.1002/pa.2170

13. Baharumshah A.Z., Soon S.-V., Lau E. Fiscal sustainability in an emerging market economy: When does public debt turn bad? Journal of Policy Modeling. 2017;39(1):99–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2016.11.002

14. Égert B. Public debt, economic growth and nonlinear effects: Myth or reality? Journal of Macroeconomics. 2015;43:226–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.11.006

15. Eberhardt M., Presbitero A. F. Public debt and growth: Heterogeneity and non-linearity. Journal of International Economics. 2015;97(1):45–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.04.005

16. Reinhart C.M., Rogoff K.S. Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review. 2010;100(2):573–578. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.2.573

17. Chudik A., Mohaddes K., Pesaran M.H., Raissi M. Is there a debt-threshold effect on output growth? The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2017;99(1):135–150. DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00593

18. Kalina A.V., Savelieva P. Formation of threshold values of the economic security of Russia and its regions. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i menedzhment = Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series “Economics and Management”. 2014;8(4):15–24. (In Russ.).

19. Kurilova A.A., Kiryushkina A.N. Assessment of debt sustainability of subjects of the Russian Federation as managing sovereign debt at the regional level. Karel’skii nauchnyi zhurnal = Karelian Scientific Journal. 2016;5(4):156–160. (In Russ.).

20. Soldatkin S.N. Debt sustainability of Russian regions: The overall assessment and the adequacy of regulation. Politematicheskii setevoi elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Scientific Journal of KubSAU. 2017;(128):1325–1342. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21515/1990–4665–128–094

21. Soldatkin S.N. Evaluation of the effectiveness of regional debt policy (on the example of the subjects of the Russian Federation included in the Far Eastern Federal District). Vestnik Khabarovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava = Bulletin of Khabarovsk State University of Economics and Law. 2019;(1):59–66. (In Russ.).

22. Buklemishev O.V., Mikhaylov D.L, Solovyev V.V., Fetisov I.G. Effectiveness of legislative restrictions on debt burden of the Russian regions. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2018;(3):34–48. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31107/2075–1990–2018–3–34–48

23. Uskova T.V. Managing the sustainable development of the region. Vologda: Institute for Socio-Economic Development of Territories RAS; 2009. 355 р. (In Russ.).

24. Kurushin D.S., Vasilyeva E.E. The construction of a typology of branch banks on the basis of cluster analysis and neural networks. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2017;21(6):6–19. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671–2017–21–6–6–19