Tax on Digital Services: Assessment of the Advantage of the Introduction in Russia

The topic of digital services tax (DST), applied in a number of foreign jurisdictions, remains relevant, and there is an active discussion in the scientific community on the advisability of introducing such a tax in Russia. The purpose of the study is to characterize the directions of the impact of such a tax on economic growth for the justification of the expediency of its introduction in Russia. The hypothesis is that the introduction of indirect DST will not lead to the withdrawal of part of the property of foreign digital giants in favor of the Russian budget, since the tax burden will be completely transferred to Russian consumers of these services, which in turn will have a negative impact on the economic growth of the domestic economy. The study of the theoretical foundations of DST and the practice of its application in foreign countries has revealed its inconsistency with the principles of neutrality and non-discrimination of taxation, the complexity of tax administration. Using economic and mathematical tools, a model was developed for transferring the tax burden when introducing DST from a foreign company to Russian clients of the platform and end consumers in Russia. A simulation experiment using Airbnb as an example showed that if a digital tax of 3% is introduced in Russia, Airbnb’s profit indicator is potentially expected to grow (which will be taxed in the Netherlands); decrease in profits of Russian Airbnb clients (Russian hotels); increase in Airbnb’s end-customer costs. Presumably, tolerable scenario is that the full burden of the digital tax will be passed on to domestic taxpayers due to the indirect nature of the digital tax. As a result of the study, the hypothesis about the lack of economic feasibility of introducing indirect DST in Russia was confirmed.

1. Milogolov N. S. Russia’s tax policy in the context of participation in the OECD/G20 BEPS project: Problems and prospects. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2016;(15):34–44. (In Russ.).

2. Pistone P., Weber D., eds. Taxing the digital economy: The EU proposals and other insights. Amsterdam: IBFD; 2019. 356 p.

3. Polezharova L. V. Krasnobaeva A. M. E-commerce taxation in Russia: Problems and approaches. Journal of Tax Reform. 2020;6(2):104–123. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.077

4. Bunn D. Tax competition of a different flavor at the OECD. Tax Foundation. Mar. 19, 2019. URL: https://taxfoundation.org/tax-competition-of-a-different-flavor-at-the-oecd (accessed on 17.11.2021).

5. Kofler G., Sinnig J. Equalization taxes and the EU’s ‘digital services tax’. Intertax. 2019;47(2):176–200. DOI: 10.54648/taxi2019017

6. Devereux M. P., Vella J. Debate: Implications of digitalization for international corporate tax reform. Intertax. 2018;46(6/7):550–559. DOI: 10.54648/taxi2018056

7. Grinberg I. International taxation in an era of digital disruption: Analyzing the current debate. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Law Center; 2018. 55 p. URL: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3136&context=facpub

8. Sinitsyn A., Airapetyan L., Surkova A. Digital tax in Russia: Prospects for introduction. Moscow: Center for Strategic Research; 2020. 39 p. URL: https://www.csr.ru/upload/iblock/5ef/5ef5a7831553dc062605b281a53e4350.pdf (In Russ.).

9. Mitin D. A. Improvement of the models of tax administration of income of digital companies received from commercial activity on the territory of the Russian Federation. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Taxes and Taxation. 2020;(6):14–25. (In Russ.). DOI: 10/7256/2454–065X.2020.6.33715

10. Mitin D. A. Improvement of the existing in the Russian Federation model of tax administration of e-commerce. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Taxes and taxation. 2020;(5):1–17. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/2454–065X.2020.5.33517

11. Olbert M., Spengel M. International taxation in the digital economy: Challenge accepted? World Tax Journal. 2017;9(1):3–46. URL: https://www.ottimoacademy.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Scarica-il-file-PDF-sugli-aspetti-fiscali-nelleconomia-digitale-44-pagine..pdf

12. Garbarini C. Six questions plus one about the proposed EU directive on the taxation of a “significant digital presence”. Kluwer International Tax Blog. Apr. 20, 2018. URL: http://kluwertaxblog.com/2018/04/20/six-questionsplus-one-proposed-eu-directive-taxation-significant-digital-presence/ (accessed on 17.11.2021).

13. Lamensch M. Digital services tax: A critical analysis and comparison with the VAT system. European Taxation. 2019;59(6).

14. Milogolov N. S., Ponomareva K. A. Taxation of business models with a high digitalization level: A search for consensus on international and national levels. Nalogi. 2020;(4):40–44. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18572/1999–4796–2020–4–40–44

15. Chand V., Turina A., Ballivet L. Profit allocation within MNEs in light of the ongoing digital debate on Pillar I — a “2020 compromise”? World Tax Journal. 2020;12(3):565–630.

16. Kudryashova E. V. Digital taxes or a new architecture of international taxation? Nalogi. 2021;(4):37–40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18572/1999–4796–2021–4–37–40

17. Geringer S. National digital taxes — Lessons from Europe. South African Journal of Accounting Research. 2021;35(1):1–19. DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2020.1727083

18. Ponomareva K. A. Transitory tax for digital services in the EU. Nalogoved. 2020;(4):79–89. (In Russ.).

19. Bergmann U. M., Hansen N. L. Are excise taxes on beverages fully passed through to prices? The Danish evidence. FinanzArchiv. 2019;75(4):323–356. DOI: 10.1628/fa-2019–0010

20. Næss-Schmidt H.S., Marquart G., Sørensen P. The impact of an EU digital service tax on German businesses. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Economics; 2018. 36 p. URL: https://copenhageneconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/181019-dst-report.pdf (accessed on 11.01.2022).

21. Dimitropoulou C. The digital service tax: An anti-protectionist and anti-restriction appraisal under EU primary law. Intertax. 2019;47(2):201–218. DOI: 10.54648/taxi2019018

22. Simontacchi S., Adda M., Scandone F. S. INSIGHT: Possible double taxation behind the Italian digital services tax. Bloomberg Tax. Feb. 03, 2020. URL: https://news.bloombergtax.com/daily-tax-report-international/insightpossible-double-taxation-behind-the-italian-digital-services-tax (accessed on 11.07.2021).