Impact of the board of directors’ structure on the company’s financial results

Subject of study — role of corporate governance practices in managing the largest Russian banks. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that decisions affecting financial results of companies depend on socio-demographic characteristics of their decision-makers and technology of these decisions. The Board of Directors is the body that controls the activities of management, and the efficiency of management decisions depends on its structure. The aim of the study is to estimate the influence of socio-demographic characteristics of directors on financial results of banks. In this research the authors use such method as panel regression analysis to estimate the significance of the obtained results. The sample captures the data on 6 largest Russian banks by total assets for the period 2011–2020. As the result, gender board diversity has a positive and statistically significant impact both on ROA and ROE. Meanwhile, the influence of national diversity on ROE is insignificant whereas the effect of this variable on ROA is significant and negative. In addition to board diversity features, business size is also an important determinant of profitability. The negative influence of this indicator should not be understood literally. The largest Russian banks are examined in this article, so the growth in the volume of their assets is associated with a decline in profitability in relative terms. The analysis also reveals that board independence and leverage do not affect profitability. Conclusion confirm a positive influence of board gender diversity on financial performance of Russian banks. Along with that, a negative impact of national diversity and an insignificant impact of board independence refute the results reported by both foreign and Russian authors. Further research on the influence of corporate governance practices on financial performance of Russian companies is required.

1. Dement’eva A.G. Corporate governance. Moscow: Magistr; 2017. 721 p. (In Russ.).

2. Akhmedova E.A. Corporate governance. Moscow: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing; 2018. 204 p. (In Russ.).

3. Mikhailov D.M. Effective corporate governance. Moscow: KnoRus; 2015. 448 p. (In Russ.).

4. Mishurova I.V., Panfilova E.A., Nesterova O.S. Specification of corporate conflicts in the context of the “agency theory”. Russian Journal of Management. 2020;8(2):36–40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29039/2409–6024–2020–8–2–36–40

5. Panda B., Leepsa N.M. Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance. 2017;10(1):74–95. DOI: 10.1177/0974686217701

6. Kudin L.Internal corporate control and CEO’s dual position. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekonomika = Theoretical and Applied Economics. 2020;(3):1–10. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25136/2409–8647.2020.3.33170

7. Prommin P., Jumreornvong S., Jiraporn P., Tong S. Liquidity, ownership, concentration, corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from Thailand. Global Finance Journal. 2016;31:73–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2016.06.006

8. Gaitán S., Herrera-Echeverri H., Pablo E. How corporate governance affects productivity in civil-law business environments: Evidence from Latin America. Global Finance Journal. 2018;37:173–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2018.05.004

9. Fedorova E.A., Komletsova V.G., Tregubova M.K., Maksimova A. Yu., Emel’yanova V.D. The impact of corporate governance on the capital structure of domestic companies. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(2):25–37. DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671–2022–26–2–25–37

10. Basheer M.F., Gupta S., Raoof R., Waemustafa W. Revisiting the agency conflicts on family-owned pyramidal business structures: A case of an emerging market. Cogent Economics and Finance. 2021,9(1):1926617. DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2021.1926617

11. Perfilyev A.A., Bufetova L.P., Shen B. Analysis of capital structure of commercial banks. Mir ekonomiki i upravleniya = World of Economics and Management. 2021;21(3):45–69. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25205/2542–0429–2021–21–3–45–69

12. Kovalev E.A. Probability theory and mathematical statistics for economists. Moscow: Urait; 2019. 284 p. (In Russ.).

13. Babeshko L.O. Fundamental of econometric modelling. 4th ed. Moscow: KomKniga; 2020. 428 p. (In Russ.).

14. Il’chenko A.N., Ksenofontova O.L., Kanakina G.V. Workshop in economic and mathematical methods. Moscow: Finansy i statistika; 2009. 287 p. (In Russ.).

15. Fomin G.P. Economic and mathematical methods and models in commercial activity. 4th ed. Moscow: Urait; 2019. 462 p. (In Russ.).

16. Babaitsev V.A. Mathematical methods of financial analysis. 2nd ed. Moscow: Urait; 2019. 215 p. (In Russ.).

17. Chapple L., Humphrey J.E. Does board gender diversity have a financial impact? Evidence using stock portfolio performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 2014;122(4):709–723. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–013–1785–0

18. Kyaw K., Olugbode M., Petracci B. Does gender diverse board mean less earnings management? Finance Research Letters. 2015;14:135–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2015.05.006

19. Liu Y., Wei Z., Xie F. Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance. 2014;28:169–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016

20. Zelechowski D.D., Bilimoria D. Characteristics of women and men corporate inside directors in the US. Corporate Governance. 2004;12(3):337–342. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–8683.2004.00374.x

21. Velte P. Do women on board of directors have an impact on corporate governance quality and firm performance? A literature review. International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management. 2017;5(4):302–346. DOI: 10.1504/IJSSM.2017.10010121

22. Amin A., Ali R., Rehman R.U., Naseem M.A., Ahmad M.I. Female presence in corporate governance, firm performance, and the moderating role of family ownership. Economic Research. 2022;35(1):929–948. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1952086

23.