Prospects for the Incorporation of the Digital Ruble into Russia’s Monetary Turnover: Attributes and Principles for Developing a Trusted Digital Environment

The rapid nature of the modernization of monetary turnover, accompanied by geopolitical risks against the background of post-pandemic economic recovery and the regionalization process, no longer just arouses the discursive interest of society, but becomes an indispensable condition of the new reality. The process of money turnover transformation by introducing digital currencies into circulation in the wave of digitalization among world powers lagging behind the evolving environment of the cryptocurrency industry is developing into a process of formalization of metaverses and penetrates deeper into the socio-economic reality. The problem of the Russian practice of developing the payment environment consists in its catching-up character, caused by the spontaneous formation of the digital society, resulting in the expansion of the scope of alternative finance outside the legal field. The purpose of the paper is to determine the inherent attributes of the digital trusted environment necessary to ensure digital ruble turnover, based on an empirical study of society’s perceptions about the prospects for using the digital form of the national monetary unit by representatives of various generations. We used systematization, grouping, comparative and content analysis, surveys, and the quota method to achieve the paper’s purpose. The survey involved 35,327 residents from different regions. As a result, the authors revealed the low level of readiness of society for the introduction of the digital ruble as a substitute for cash and cryptocurrency. The paper focuses on the need for an integrated approach to the disclosure of the digital ruble’s value and benefits, which contributes to its successful launch and promotion in the market. The results of the research highlight the importance of correspondence in the digital ruble category “digital currencies”, and also the impossibility of making incorrect decisions in the transformation of money turnover, which leads to the growth of risks of digital inequality, the clash of interests of certain groups of the population in the prevailing behavioral patterns in the form of a cautious attitude to digital finance with insufficient financial literacy.

1. Bech M., Garratt R. Central bank cryptocurrencies. BIS Quarterly Review. 2017;(Sept.):55–70. URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt1709f.pdf (accessed on 09.02.2023).

2. Zhao H., Zhang L. Financial literacy or investment experience: Which is more influential in cryptocurrency investment? International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2021;39(7):1208–1226. DOI: 10.1108/IJBM‑11–2020–0552

3. Krylova L. V., Lukashenko I. V. Cryptocurrencies vs central banks’ digital currencies: The role of financial literacy. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(5):220–232. DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671–2022–26–5–220–232

4. Panos G., Karkkainen T., Atkinson A. Financial literacy and attitudes to cryptocurrencies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2020. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3482083

5. Pham Q. T., Phan H. H., Cristofaro M., Misra S., Giardino P. L. Examining the intention to invest in cryptocurrencies: An extended application of the theory of planned behavior on Italian independent investors. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics. 2021;10(3):59–79. DOI: 10.4018/ijabe.2021070104

6. Evtukh O. T. The information essence of money through the prism of modern financial science. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2003;(17):43–46. (In Russ.).

7. Miller R. L., VanHoose D. D. Modern money and banking. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1993. 864 p. (Russ. ed.: Miller R. L., VanHoose D. D. Sovremennye den’gi i bankovskoe delo. Moscow: Infra-M; 2000. 856 p.).

8. Fischer S., Dornbusch R., Schmalensee R. Economics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1988. 813 p. (Russ. ed.: Fischer S., Dornbusch R., Schmalensee R. Ekonomika. Moscow: Delo Ltd; 1995. 864 p.).

9. Dolan E. G., Campbell C. D., Campbell R. G. Money, banking, and monetary policy. Chicago, IL: Dryden Press; 1988. 617 p. (Russ. ed.: Dolan E. G., Campbell C. D., Campbell R. G. Den’gi, bankovskoe delo i denezhnokreditnaya politika. Bishkek: Turan; 1999. 496 p.).

10. Berentsen A., Schär F. The case for central bank electronic money and the non-case for central bank cryptocurrencies. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review. 2018;100(2):97–106. DOI: 10.20955/r.2018.97–106

11. Chiu J., Koeppl T. V. The economics of cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin and beyond. Canadian Journal of Economics/ Revue canadienne d’économique. 2022;55(4):1762–1798. DOI: 10.1111/caje.12625

12. Waknis P. Competitive supply of money in a new monetarist model. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. MPRA Paper. 2017;(75401). URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/75401/1/MPRA_paper_75401.pdf (accessed on 05.01.2023). 13. Schwab K., Malleret T. COVID‑19: The great reset. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2020. 280 p.

13. Wayner P. Beyond bitcoin: 7 ways to capitalize on blockchains. InfoWorld. Aug. 31, 2015. URL: https://www.infoworld.com/article/2976358/beyond-bitcoin‑7-ways-to-capitalize-on-blockchains.html (accessed on 01.02.2023).

14. Genkin A., Mikheev A. Blockchain for everyone: How cryptocurrencies, BaaS, NFT, DeFi and other new financial technologies work. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2023. 588 p. (In Russ.).

15. Van der Spek L., Phijffer S. Will BigTechs change the European payments market forever? Compact. 2020;(2):12–25. URL: https://www.compact.nl/articles/will-bigtechs-change-the-european-paymentsmarket- forever/ (accessed on 21.01.2023).

16. Adrian T. BigTech in financial services. International Monetary Fund. Jun. 16, 2021. URL: https://www.imf. org/en/News/Articles/2021/06/16/sp061721-bigtech-in-financial-services (accessed on 13.01.2023).

17. Croxson K., Frost J., Gambacorta L., Valetti T. Platform-based business models and financial inclusion. BIS Working Papers. 2022;(986). URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/work986.pdf (accessed on 11.01.2023).

18. Zeleneva E. S. Communication policy of the Bank of Russia in conditions of political instability. Bankovskie uslugi = Banking Services. 2022;(2):12–16. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.36992/2075–1915_2022_2_12

19. Bodrunov S. D. Noonomics. Moscow: Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya; 2018. 432 p. (In Russ.).

20. Kochergin D. A., Sheshukova E. S. Bigtech-companies ecosystems prospects in the payment sector. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(6):32–51. DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671–2022–26–6–32–51

21.