An Old song in a New Way: About the Progression in the Personal Income Tax

The issues of choosing between proportional and progressive taxation of personal income and assessment of the principle of fair taxation in relation to these methods accompany the centuries-old history of world tax policy, which is the relevance of the research, being the subject of discussions of Russian and foreign scientists. The purpose of the study is to develop the idea of taxation of income of the population in Russia, taking into account the principle of fair taxation. The theoretical objectives of the study include an analysis of the validity of the method of taxation chosen, as well as an analysis of the progressive method of taxation, which allows for a fair redistribution of income through the progression of rates and an adequate system of tax deductions. The practical objectives of the study are to study the influence of income taxation methods on the formation of budget revenues and incomes of the population, to assess the “shadow” fiscal potential of income, to determine the level of demand and significance of tax deductions. As a result of the research, it has been scientifically proven that proportional taxation and weak progression discredit the principle of vertical equity, lead to a hidden progression in the withdrawal of income, have no obvious positive effect on capital outflow and, in combination with insurance premiums, affect the size of the potential tax base. The practical significance of the study is to develop concrete proposals for the methodological development of personal income tax through differentiated tax deductions, tax mechanisms for strengthening the institution of family and marriage, and the expansion of the tax base.

1. Smith A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2008. 1152 p.

2. Yumaev M. M. Compliance with the criteria for the effectiveness of the tax system of the Russian Federation from the position of personal income tax. Nalogovyi vestnik. 1998;(2):22–24. (In Russ.).

3. Edronova V. N., Telegus A. V. Income taxation in the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union: Identity and differences. Bukhgalterskii uchet v byudzhetnykh i nekommercheskikh organizatsiyakh = Accounting in Budgetary and Non-Profit Organizations. 2020;(5):33–48. (In Russ.).

4. Smorodina E. A., Rudenok E. V. Problems of progressive taxation of personal income: World history and modernity. Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science. 2021;(75):30–35. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/3453–9875–2021–75–1–30–35

5. Panskov V. G. Progressive or proportional scale of taxation: Which is fairer and more effective? Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2017;10(2):105–112. (In Russ.).

6. Tikhonova A. V. Tax burden and other reasons for law-abiding behavior of individuals. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2021;14(2):169–178. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999–849X-2021–14–2–169–178

7. Fedotov D. Yu. Corruption and tax evasion: The relationship of social phenomena. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2018;24(12):2849–2862. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/fc.24.12.2849

8. Repetti J. R. The appropriate roles for equity and efficiency in a progressive individual income tax. Florida Tax Review. 2020;23(2):522–596. DOI: 10.5744/ftr.2020.2004

9. Friedman M. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1962. 202 p.

10. Melnikova N. P., Tikhonova A. V. Risks of transition from personal income tax to progressive income taxation of individuals: Theoretical and practical aspects. Problemy analiza riska = Issues of Risk Analysis. 2017;14(4);24–35. (In Russ.).

11. Nadirov O., Dehning B., Pavelkova D. Taxes and the incentive to work under flat and progressive tax systems in Slovakia. Economics and Sociology. 2021;14(2):40–55. DOI: 10.14254/2071–789X.2021/14–2/2

12. Goldman N. C., Lusch S. J., Sadka G. The inherent conflict between progressive tax rates and income inequality: Lessons from COVID-19 restrictions. Accounting and the Public Interest. 2022;22(1):1–32. DOI: 10.2308/API-2022–006

13. Chernykh E. A. The current state of research on the content, forms, tools and mechanisms of introducing unconditional basic income. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii = Living Standards and Quality of Life. 2020;16(2):61–75. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/lsprr/2020.16.2.6

14. Tikhonova A. V. Theoretical foundations of building a system of taxation of the population. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekonomika = Theoretical and Applied Economics. 2022;(1):25–39. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25136/2409–8647.2022.1.36261

15. Qu J. Research on the new round of individual income tax policy reform. SHS Web of Conferences. 2023;154:02002. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202315402002

16. Rossi P., Gonçalves R., Zhang P. Progressivity and distributive impacts of personal income tax: The case of China and Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy. 2022;42(4):998–1013. DOI: 10.1590/0101–31572022–3323

17. Panskov V. G., Melnikova N. P. Topical issues of increasing the role of personal income tax in reducing of social inequality. Finansy = Finance. 2018;(10):41–47. (In Russ.).

18. Goncharenko L. I., Malkova Yu.V., Polezharova L. V., Tikhonova A. V., Yumaev M. M. On the main directions of tax policy for 2022 and for the period 2023–2024. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2022;15(1):23–34. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999–849X 2022–15–1–23–34

19. Falishtyanu A. V., Dementeeva N. A., Artemenko G. A. Improving the taxation of individuals. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo = Business. Education. Law. 2021;(4):227–231. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2021.57.420

20. Hedau A. Taxation of family income under Indian taxation laws: A new perspective. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2020;8(12):975–978. DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/12244

21. Parente S. A. Family income taxation models in the Italian legal system: Analysis and perspectives. Bialystok Legal Studies / Białostockie Studia Prawnicze. 2022;27(3):207–225. DOI: 10.15290/bsp.2022.27.03.12