Effects of Corporate Environmental Responsibility, CSR and CEO Shareholding on Financial Performance: Evidence from U.S.-Listed Companies

Corporate environmental responsibility (CER) plays an important role in the sustainable policies of firms and affects the behaviors of managers. For U.S. listed firms for 2010–2021, this study aims at evaluating the sustainability of investment through corporate environmental responsibility (CER) and corporate social responsibility (CSR), the complementarily or substitutability between (CER) and the CEO shareholding, and the impact on corporate financial performance (CFP).The results show that CSR efforts create a good image of the company, which subsequently enhances the credibility of its corporate environmental responsibility projects. Also, the results show the corporate environmental responsibility of U.S listed companies has a positive impact on performance. Specifically, the CEO’s shareholding serves as a mediator between corporate environmental responsibility and CFP. Moreover, the paper finds substitutability between CEO shareholding and corporate environmental responsibility, so the more the shareholding CEO is reluctant to take the risk, the more they avoid investing in corporate environmental responsibility projects. This finding will reinforce the positive effect of corporate environmental responsibility on performance. A positive relationship was recorded between CFP and the combination between CSR and CER and between CFP and the combination between CER and CEO shareholding. Taken together, our evidence suggests that CER concerns could enhance the extent of managerial learning, especially for firms experiencing greater risks. Our paper provides new evidence for the role of CER in reducing corporate risk and further confirms the importance of the corporate environment by conducting a robustness test.

1. Le T.T., Ferasso M. How green investment drives sustainable business performance for food manufacturing small- and medium-sized enterprises? Evidence from an emerging economy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2022;29(4):1034–1049. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2252

2. Anees R.T., Heidler P., Cavaliere L.P.L., Nordin N.A. Brain drain in higher education. The impact of job stress and workload on turnover intention and the mediating role of job satisfaction at universities. European Journal of Business and Management Research. 2021;6(3):1–8. DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.3.849

3. Han J.-J., Kim H.J., Yu J. Empirical study on relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Korea. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility. 2016;1:61–76. DOI: 10.1186/s41180–016–0002–3

4. Li Z., Liao G., Albitar K. Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020;29(3):1045–1055. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2416

5. Peng B., Tu Y., Elahi E., Wei G. Extended producer responsibility and corporate performance: Effects of environmental regulation and environmental strategy. Journal of Environmental Management. 2018;218:181–189. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.068

6. Li Z.F., Patel S., Ramani S. The role of mutual funds in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021;174(3):715–737. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–020–04618-x

7. Marsat S., Mard Y., Roux F. Structure de l’actionnariat et performance financière de l’entreprise: Le cas français. Finance Contrôle Stratégie. 2014;(17–4):1–41. DOI: 10.4000/fcs.1559

8. Chen J., Zhang F., Liu L., Zhu L. Does environmental responsibility matter in cross-sector partnership formation? A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019;231:612–621. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.099

9. Devie D., Liman L.P., Tarigan J., Jie F.Corporate social responsibility, financial performance and risk in Indonesian natural resources industry. Social Responsibility Journal. 2020;16(1):73–90. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-06–2018–0155

10. Yumei H., Iqbal W., Irfan M., Fatima A. The dynamics of public spending on sustainable green economy: Role of technological innovation and industrial structure effects. Environmental Science and Pollutioon Research. 2022;29(16):22970–22988. DOI: 10.1007/s11356–021–17407–4

11. Tumio R.A., Jamali R.H., Mirani A.A., Das G., Laghari M.A., Xiao J. The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosures and financial performance: A mediating role of employee productivity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28(9):10661–10677. DOI: 10.1007/s11356–020–11247–4

12. Kao E.H., Yeh C.-C., Wang L.-H., Fung H.-G. The relationship between CSR and performance: Evidence in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2018;51:155–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.04.006

13. Liu Z., Li W., Hao C., Liu H. Corporate environmental performance and financing constraints: An empirical study in the Chinese context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2021;28(2):616–629. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2073

14. Rehman Z., Khan A., Rahman A. Corporate social responsibility’s influence on firm risk and firm performance: The mediating role of firm reputation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2020;27(6):2991–3005. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2018

15. Sarkar A., Qian L., Peau A.K. Overview of green business practices within the Bangladeshi RMG industry: Competitiveness and sustainable development perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27(18):22888–22901. DOI: 10.1007/s11356–020–08816-y

16. Shabbir M., Wisdom O. The relationship between corporate social responsibility, environmental investments and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27(32):39946–39957. DOI: 10.1007/s11356–020–10217–0

17. Dimitropoulos P., Koronios K. Corporate environmental responsibility, accounting and corporate finance in the EU: A quantitative analysis approach. Cham: Springer-Verlag; 2021. 265 p. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–030–72773–4

18. Wu F., Ren Z., Wang Q., et al. The relationship between job stress and job burnout: The mediating effects of perceived social support and job satisfaction. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2021;26(2):204–211. DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1778750

19. Brammer S., Brooks C., Pavelin S. Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management. 2006;35(3):97–116. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755–053X.2006.tb00149.x

20. Maqbool S., Bakr A. The curvilinear relationship between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Indian companies. Journal of Global Responsibility. 2019;10(1):87–100. DOI: 10.1108/JGR-11–2018–0060

21. Yoon B., Chung Y. The effects of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2018;37:89–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.10.005

22. Demsetz H. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. The Journal of Law and Economics. 1983;26(2):375–390. DOI: 10.1086/467041

23. Han K.C., Suk D.Y. The effect of ownership structure on firm performance: Additional evidence. Review of Financial Economics. 1998;7(2):143–155. DOI: 10.1016/S1058–3300(99)80150–5

24. Hu Y., Zhou X. The performance effect of managerial ownership: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking and Finance. 2008;32(10):2099–2110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.047

25. Chen C.-H.V., Cheng T.-Y.D. Investigating the relationships between CEO duality, shareholding and entrepreneurial performance: The mediating effect of R&D intensity. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development. 2011;11(1):52–68. DOI: 10.1504/IJMED.2011.042972

26. Carroll A.B. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society. 1999;38(3):268–295. DOI: 10.1177/000765039903800303

27. Babiak K., Trendafilova S. CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2011;18(1):11–24. DOI: 10.1002/csr.229

28. Wang H., Lu W., Ye M., Chau K.W., Zhang X. The curvilinear relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: Evidence from the international construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;137:1313–1322. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.184

29. Moran P. Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal. 2005;26(12):1129–1151. DOI: 10.1002/smj.486

30. Amodu N. Stakeholder protection and corporate social responsibility from a comparative company law perspective: Nigeria and South Africa. Journal of African Law. 2020;64(3):425–449. DOI: 10.1017/S0021855320000212

31. Raven B.H. The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues. 1993;49(4):227–251. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–4560.1993.tb01191.x

32. Pitcher P., Chreim S., Kisflvi V. CEO succession research: Methodological bridges over troubled waters. Strategic Management Journal. 2000;21(6):625–648. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097–0266(200006)21:63.0.CO;2-A