RATING THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVE AUTHORITIES BY THE PUBLIC
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2016-20-6-178-185
Abstract
A social research to assess the maturity and effectiveness of the anti-corruption policy of executive bodies through self-report questionnaires has been carried out. Population: adults (18 years and older). The process of completing and submitting questionnaires (on the condition of anonymity) was not controlled by the researchers. Questionnaires that were not filled out or partially filled out were not accepted. The total sample amount was 320 respondents of which 300 respondents were finally subjected to the study. The social research from the development of questionnaires to the final report was carried out step by step from March 26 to July 20, 2016. The findings of the research were reflected in the State Assignment report of 2016. The polling data was processed using the method of public perception ratings. The public assessment of the effectiveness of anti-corruption policies at various government levels again revealed the confidence of the respondents in the federal authorities. The study resulted in the formation of the perception rating of maturity and effectiveness of individual executive authorities at the public level.
About the Authors
N. N. Chalenko
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
K. I. Solodovnikova
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Prasolov V. I, Solodovnikova K.I. Protivodejstvie korrupcii na osnove nejtralizacii korystnyh motivov [Anticorruption on the basis of neutralization selfi sh motives]. Uspehi sovremennoj nauki — Successes of modern science, 2016, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 46–48 (in Russian).
2. Prasolov V.I. Dejatel’nost’ kontrol’nyh organov Rossii po protivodejstviju korrupcii v sfere upravlenija federal’noj sobstvennost’ju // [Activity monitoring Russian authorities to combat corruption in the Federal Property Management]. Imushhestvennye otnoshenija v Rossijskoj Federacii –Property relations in the Russian Federation, 2016, no. 2 (173), pp. 80–89 (in Russian).
3. Avdiysky V.I., Bezdenezhnykh V.M. Riski hozjajstvujushhih sub′ektov [Risks businesses]. Moscow, Financial university under the Government of the Russian Federation, 2014 (in Russian).
4. Avdiysky V.I., Dadalko V.A. Tenevaja jekonomika i jekonomicheskaja bezopasnost’ gosudarstva. 2-e izd. [The shadow economy and economic security of the state. 2nd edition]. Moscow, Alpha-M: INFRA-M, 2010 (in Russ.).
5. Dadalko V.A., Chalenko N.N. Kontrafakt i svjazannye s nim ugrozy v jelektrojenergetike [Counterfeit and related threats in the power]. Strahovoe delo — Insurance business, 2016, no. 2 (275), pp. 25–31 (in Russian).
6. Otchet po nauchno-issledovatel’skoj rabote na temu «Provedenie uglublennogo sociologicheskogo issledovanija korrupcii v Murmanskoj oblasti» [Implementation of in-depth case study of corruption in the Murmansk region. The report on the research work]. Murmansk, 2007, pp. 36–39 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Chalenko N.N., Solodovnikova K.I. RATING THE ACTIVITIES OF EXECUTIVE AUTHORITIES BY THE PUBLIC. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2016;20(6):178-185. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2016-20-6-178-185
Views:
505
Email this article 