Решение о хранении наличных средств, обусловленное чрезмерной самоуверенностью менеджеров, и его влияние на результаты деятельности компании

Чрезмерная самоуверенность менеджеров оказывает значительное влияние на результаты деятельности компании. Основной целью данного исследования является выявление влияния чрезмерной самоуверенности менеджеров, которая в сочетании с решением о хранении наличности может стать негативным фактором для компании. Проведено эмпирическое исследование на выборке из 648 фирм, зарегистрированных на фондовом рынке Вьетнама. Результаты исследования показали, что чем выше уровень самоуверенности менеджеров, тем выше риск и вероятность снижения стоимости компании, особенно при неправильном решении о хранении денежных средств. Также выявлена положительная корреляция между самоуверенностью руководителей и стоимостью компании. Фирмы, для которых характерны как чрезмерная самоуверенность руководителей, так и низкий уровень владения денежными средствами, как правило, демонстрируют более низкие показатели по сравнению с другими. Эти результаты отвечают цели исследования.

1. Kim H. A., Choi S. U., Choi W. Managerial overconfidence and firm profitability. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics. 2022;29(1):129–153. DOI: 10.1080/16081625.2019.1673190

2. Jiang F., Stone G. R., Sun J., Zhang M. Managerial hubris, firm expansion and firm performance: Evidence from China. The Social Science Journal. 2011;48(3):489–499. DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2011.05.007

3. Dao N. T. Cash holdings and over-investments during COVID-19 pandemic: The evidence from Vietnam. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance. 2021;9(6):1273–1279. DOI: 10.13189/ujaf.2021.090607

4. Ackert L. F., Deaves R. Behavioral finance: Psychology, decision-making, and markets. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning; 2009. 432 p.

5. Gervais S., Odean T. Learning to be overconfident. The Review of Financial Studies. 2001;14(1):1–27. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/14.1.1

6. Camerer C., Lovallo D. Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. American Economic Review. 1999;89(1):306–318. DOI: 10.1257/aer.89.1.306

7. Vitanova I. Nurturing overconfidence: The relationship between leader power, overconfidence and firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly. 2021;32(4):101342. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101342

8. Agrawal A., Knoeber C. R. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 1996;31(3):377–397. DOI: 10.2307/2331397

9. Yermack D. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics. 1996;40(2):185–211. DOI: 10.1016/0304–405X(95)00844–5

10. Al-Najjar B. Corporate governance, tourism growth and firm performance: Evidence from publicly listed tourism firms in five Middle Eastern countries. Tourism Management. 2014;42:342–351. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.09.008

11. Zabri S. M., Ahmad K., Wah K. K. Corporate governance practices and firm performance: Evidence from top 100 public listed companies in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2016;35:287–296. DOI: 10.1016/S2212–5671(16)00036–8

12. Eisenberg T., Sundgren S., Wells M. T. Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics. 1998;48(1):35–54. DOI: 10.1016/S0304–405X(98)00003–8

13. Saona P., San Martín P. Country level governance variables and ownership concentration as determinants of firm value in Latin America. International Review of Law and Economics. 2016;47:84–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2016.06.004

14. Lozano M. B., Martínez B., Pindado J. Corporate governance, ownership and firm value: Drivers of ownership as a good corporate governance mechanism. International Business Review. 2016;25(6):1333–1343. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.04.005

15. Vintilă G., Gherghina Ş. C. The impact of ownership concentration on firm value. Empirical study of the Bucharest Stock Exchange listed companies. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2014;15:271–279. DOI: 10.1016/S2212–5671(14)00500–0

16. Liu Y., Wei Z., Xie F. Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance. 2014;28:169–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016

17. Mohamed E. B., Jarboui S., Baccar A., Bouri A. On the effect of CEOs’ personal characteristics in transport firm value? A stochastic frontier model. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 2015;3(2):176–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2015.01.001

18. Giriati Z. Free cash flow, dividend policy, investment opportunity set, opportunistic behavior and firm’s value: (A study about agency theory). Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016;219:248–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.013

19. Mak Y. T., Kusnadi Y. Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2005;13(3):301–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.09.002

20. Faleye O. Classified boards, firm value, and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Financial Economics. 2007;83(2):501–529. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.005

21. Konijn S. J.J., Kräussl R., Lucas A. Blockholder dispersion and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2011;17(5):1330–1339. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.06.005

22. Kuzey C., Uyar A., Delen D. The impact of multinationality on firm value: A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques. Decision Support Systems. 2014;59:127–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2013.11.001

23. Jiao Y. Stakeholder welfare and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2010;34(10):2549–2561. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.04.013

24. Ammann M., Oesch D., Schmid M. M. Corporate governance and firm value: International evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance. 2011;18(1):36–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2010.10.003

25. Li Y., Gong M., Zhang X.-Y., Koh L. The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power. The British Accounting Review. 2018;50(1):60–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.007

26. Bourne M., Franco M., Wilkes J. Corporate performance management. Measuring Business Excellence. 2003;7(3):15–21. DOI: 10.1108/13683040310496462

27. Dao N. T., Guney Y., Hudson R. Managerial overconfidence and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from primary and secondary data. Research in International Business and Finance. 2023;65:101943. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101943

28. Schrand C. M., Zechman S. L.C. Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2012;53(1–2):311–329. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.001

29. Guney Y., Ozkan A., Ozkan N. International evidence on the non-linear impact of leverage on corporate cash holdings. Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 2007;17(1):45–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2006.03.003

30. Kling G., Paul S. Y., Gonis E. Cash holding, trade credit and access to short-term bank finance. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2014;32:123–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2014.01.013

31. Orens R., Reheul A.-M. Do CEO demographics explain cash holdings in SMEs? European Management Journal. 2013;31(6):549–563. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2013.01.003

32. Kusnadi Y., Wei K. C.J. The determinants of corporate cash management policies: Evidence from around the world. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2011;17(3):725–740. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.12.002

33. Díaz-Díaz N.L., García-Teruel P.J., Martínez-Solano P. Debt maturity structure in private firms: Does the family control matter? Journal of Corporate Finance. 2016;37:393–411. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.01.016

34. Amess K., Banerji S., Lampousis A. Corporate cash holdings: Causes and consequences. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2015;42:421–433. DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2015.09.007

35. Barclay M. J., Marx L. M., Smith C. W. Jr. The joint determination of leverage and maturity. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2003;9(2):149–167. DOI: 10.1016/S0929–1199(02)00003–2