Assessment of the Impact of the Money supply on Russian GDP Growth Rates
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-1-34-44
Abstract
The subject of the study is the dynamics of real and nominal GDP in Russia for the period from 1995 to 2024 inclusive. In this study, the impact of the money supply on the economic growth rate and the level of inflation in the Russian Federation is assessed, and a forecast of such an impact is made for 2025. The purpose of the study is to determine, using quantitative methods, the degree of influence of the money supply on the dynamics of Russian GDP and inflation in order to identify the direction and limits of monetary management of the economy. The relevance of the study is that the results allow obtaining a higher rate of economic growth in Russia. The result of the study is the constructed stochastic model of the annual balanced increment of the money supply, as well as the discovered non-linear statistical relationship between the dynamics of the increments of the money supply and GDP. Dynamic modeling of the money supply was used as a method of analysis. Dynamic modeling of the money supply was used as a method of analysis.The model constructed by the authors, which includes the Keynesian demand function for the money supply and the neoclassical Cobb-Douglas production function, approximating the dynamics of GDP, helped to calculate the annual volume of money supply growth (M2 aggregate), accelerating the GDP growth rate in modern economic conditions. A non-linear relationship between the dynamics of the money supply and GDP was confirmed in the course of the study, which made it possible to evaluate the most optimal increase in the money supply in the country to accelerate the growth of Russian GDP. The result that
was obtained indicates that one should not artificially restrain the growth of the money supply, since the analysis of time series using vector autoregression recorded a positive effect of the growth of the money supply on the dynamics of Russian GDP and the absence of any impact on the dynamics of inflation.
Keywords
JEL: С51, Е51
About the Authors
I. S. IvanchenkoRussian Federation
Igor S. Ivanchenko — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Lecturer, Department of Financial Monitoring and Financial Markets
Rostov-on-Don
L. I. Nivorozhkina
Russian Federation
Ludmila I. Nivorozhkina — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Head of the Department of Statistics, Econometrics and Risk Assessment
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Abramova M. A., Dubova S. E., Bayarsaikhan Z. Formal and functional analysis of the role of money in the reproduction process: New aspects of the modern theory of money. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2021;25(3):66-89. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-3-66-89
2. Glaziev S. Yu. How monetary policy depresses economic growth in Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Russian Economic Journal. 2022;(2):4-20. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33983/0130-9757-2022-2-4-20
3. Ershov M. V. Some features of the current development and possible instruments of economic growth. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii = Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2023;239(1):356-364. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2023-239-1-356-364
4. Suharev O. S. Monetary policy for economic growth in Russia: Accumulative slowing effect. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economy. 2023;(1):5-26. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760023986-3
5. Mishkin F. S. Symposium on the monetary transmission mechanism. Journal of Economic Perspectives.1995;9(4):3-10. DOI: 10.1257/jep.9.4.3
6. Nizhegorodtsev R., Goridko N. The impact of money supply on economic growth: Theory, experience, modelling. Handbook on Economics, Finance and Management Outlooks. 2015;3:66-72. URL: https://www. conscientiabeam.com/ebooks/11-3rdICEFMO-679-2015-(66-72).pdf
7. Friedman M., Schwartz A. J. Money and business cycles. The Review of Economics and Statistics.1963;45(1):32-64. DOI: 10.2307/1927148
8. Lucas R. E., Jr. Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory.1972;4(2):103-124. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1
9. Belongia M. T., Ireland P. N. Money and output: Friedman and Schwartz revisited. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 2016;48(6):1223-1266. DOI: 10.1111/jmcb.12332
10. Evans O., Saibu O. Quantifying the impact of monetary and exchange rate policies on economic diversification in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies.2017;59(1):131-152. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326736721_QUANTIFYING_THE_IMPACT_OF_MONETARY_AND_EXCHANGE_RATE_POLICIES_ON_ECONOMIC_DIVERSIFICATION_IN_NIGERIA
11. Evans O. Money, infl tion and output in Nigeria and South Africa: Could Friedman and Schwartz be right? Journal of African business. 2019;20(3):392-406. DOI: 10.1080/15228916.2019.1581012
12. Jarociński M., Lenza M. inflation-predicting measure of the output gap in the euro area. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 2018;50(6):1189-1224. DOI: 10.1111/jmcb.12496
13. Zhang X., Liu X., Hang J., Yao D. The dynamic causality between commodity prices, inflation and output in China: A bootstrap rolling window approach. Applied Economics. 2018;50(4):407-425. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1321835
14. Benchimol J. Money and monetary policy in Israel during the last decade. Journal of Policy Modeling. 2016;38(1):103-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.12.007
15. Canova F., Menz T. Does money matter in shaping domestic business cycles? An international investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 2011;43(4):577-607. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00388.x
16. Caraiani P. Money and output causality: A structural approach. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2016;42:220-236. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2015.12.001
17. El-Shagi M., Giesen S. Money and inflation: Consequences of the recent monetary policy. Journal of Policy Modeling. 2013;35(4):520-537. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.03.014
18. Sandoyan E. M., Akopyan L. M. Non-inflation monetization of the economy as a factor of economic development. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo = Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2008;(6):204-207. (In Russ.). URL: http://www.unn.ru/pages/e-library/vestnik/99999999_West_2008_6/34.pdf
19. Dai G. China’s monetary policy: Too tight? China & World Economy. 2002;10(1):16-20.
20. Haug A., Dewald W. Money, output and inflation in the longer term: Major industrial countries 1880-2001. Economic Inquiry. 2012;50(3):773-787. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00382.x
21. Woodford M. How important is money in the conduct of monetary policy? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 2008;40(8):1561-1598. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00175.x
22. Hossain A.A. Empirical relationships among money, output and consumer prices in nine Muslim-majority countries. Journal of Asian Economics. 2014;31-32:42-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2014.04.002
23. Fisher I. The purchasing power of money: Its determination and relation to credit, interest and crises. New York, NY: The Macmillan Co.; 1911. 515 p. (Russ. ed.: Fisher I. Pokupatel’naya sila deneg. Moscow: Delo; 2001. 320 p.).
24. Kosoi A. M. Modern money. Den’gi i kredit = Russian Journal of Money and Finance. 2002;(6):42-52. (In Russ.).
25. Ivanchenko I. S. Application of the Fisher formula in the analysis of the dynamics of the Russian money supply. Voprosy statistiki. 2005;(2):66-70. (In Russ.).
26. Keynes J. M. The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan; 1936. 383 p. (Russ. ed.: Keynes J. M. Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg. Moscow: Gelios ARV; 1999. 352 pp.
27. Goldfeld S. M., Duesenberry J., Poole W. The demand for money revisited. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1973;(3):577-646. DOI: 10.2307/2534203
Review
For citations:
Ivanchenko I.S., Nivorozhkina L.I. Assessment of the Impact of the Money supply on Russian GDP Growth Rates. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(1):34-44. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-1-34-44