Как высокая эффективность рынка акций Чили влияет на энергопереход? Исследование на базе алгоритма оптимизации Deep seek

Цель исследования — определить влияние эффективности и интеграции рынка акций Чили на переход на возобновляемые источники энергии (энергопереход). Новизна исследования состоит в систематизации аспектов эффективности и интеграции финансовых рынков, в значительной степени зависящих от возобновляемых источников энергии. Методология основана на методе Крамера-фон Мизеса и тестах оценки эффективности рынка и оптимизации на базе новейшего искусственного интеллекта китайского производства — Deep Seek. Используя два недавних расширения сетей на чилийском рынке электроэнергии, обнаружено, что рыночная интеграция привела к сближению цен между регионами, увеличению производства электроэнергии. Доказано, что методы поведенческой теории наиболее перспективны для изучения эффективности рынков Чили. Основные результаты показывают, что между центрами спроса возникает проблема сокращения производства электроэнергии из возобновляемых источников в результате кризисов. Изучен акцент интеграции рынков на инвестиционные эффекты. Сделан вывод, что рыночная интеграция и высокая эффективность рынка акций Чили повышают эффективность распределения ресурсов за счет выгод от торговли и стимулируют появление новых возобновляемых источников энергии. Практическое значение результатов исследования состоит в применении регуляторами аспектов эффективности и интеграции финансовых рынков при переходе экономики на возобновляемые источники энергии.

1. Li X., Ge X., Fan W., Zheng H. Research on spatial correlation characteristics and their spatial spillover effect of local government debt risks in China. Sustainability. 2021;13(5):2687. DOI: 10.3390/su13052687

2. Stehlík M., Leal D., Kiseľák J., Leers J., Střelec L., Fuders F. Stochastic approach to heterogeneity in shorttime announcement effects on the Chilean stock market indexes within 2016-2019. Stochastic Analysis and Applications. 2024;42(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1080/07362994.2022.2164508

3. Bilgili F., Koçak E., Kuşkaya S. Dynamics and co-movements between the COVID-19 outbreak and the stock market in Latin American countries: An evaluation based on the wavelet-partial wavelet coherence model. Evaluation Review. 2023;47(4):630-652. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X221134847

4. Jara A., Piña M. Exchange rate volatility and the effectiveness of FX interventions: The case of Chile. Latin American Journal of Central Banking. 2023;4(2):100086. DOI: 10.1016/j.latcb.2023.100086

5. Gutiérrez-Ponce H., Garrido-Suazo M. O. Analysis of the efficiency of the Chilean Stock Market. Revista Finanzas y Política Económica. 2024;16(1):17-45. DOI: 10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v16.n1.2024.2

6. Agnese P., Rios F. Spillover effects of energy transition metals in Chile. Energy Economics. 2024;134:107589. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107589

7. Didier N. Educational mismatch, labor market completeness, and gender: Evidence from Chile. International Journal of Educational Development. 2024;105:102990. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.102990

8. Pinto-Gutiérrez C. The impact of business group affiliation on CO2 emissions: Evidence from Chile. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración. 2024;37(1):57-77. DOI: 10.1108/ARLA-06-2023-0102

9. Espinosa V.I., Cueva D.O. The political economy of fiscal dominance: Evidence from the Chilean government of Salvador Allende. Economic Affairs. 2024;44(1):118-138. DOI: 10.1111/ecaf.12618

10. Yilanci V., Pata U. K. COVID-19, stock prices, exchange rates and sovereign bonds: A wavelet-based analysis for Brazil and India. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 2023;18(11):4968-4986. DOI: 10.1108/IJOEM-09-2021-1465

11. Iqbal B.A. BRICS as a driver of global economic growth and development. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies. 2022;14(1):7-8. DOI: 10.1177/09749101211067096

12. Demirer R., Ferrer R., Shahzad S. J.H. Oil price shocks, global l financial markets and their connectedness. Energy Economics. 2020;88:104771. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104771

13. Matheus J. R.V., de Farias P. M., Satoriva J. M., de Andrade C. J., Fai A. E.C. Cassava starch films for food packaging: Trends over the last decade and future research. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2023;225:658-672. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.129

14. Saqib A., Chan T.-H., Mikhaylov A., Lean H. H. Are the responses of sectoral energy imports asymmetric to exchange rate volatilities in Pakistan? Evidence from recent foreign exchange regime. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2021;9:614463. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.614463

15. An J., Mikhaylov A., Jung S.-U. The strategy of South Korea in the global oil market. Energies. 2020;13(10):2491. DOI: 10.3390/en13102491

16. Mikhaylov A. Understanding the risks associated with wallets, depository services, trading, lending, and borrowing in the crypto space. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 2023;7(3):2223. DOI: 10.24294/jipd.v7i3.2223

17. Guang‐Wen Z., Murshed M., Siddik A. B., Alam M. S., Balsalobre‐Lorente D., Mahmood H. Achieving the objectives of the 2030 sustainable development goals agenda: Causalities between economic growth, environmental sustainability, financial development, and renewable energy consumption. Sustainable Development. 2023;31(2):680-697. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2411

18. Umar Z., Yousaf I., Aharon D.Y. The relationship between yield curve components and equity sectorial indices: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2021;68:101591. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101591

19. Avdjiev S., McGuire P., Peter G. von. International dimensions of EME corporate debt. BIS Quarterly Review. 2020;(June):1-13. URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt2006b.pdf

20. Liu Z. Z., Papa M. Can BRICS de-dollarize the global l financial system? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. 94 p.

21. Umar Z., Aharon D.Y., Esparcia C., AlWahedi W. Spillovers between sovereign yield curve components and oil price shocks. Energy Economics. 2022;109:105963. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105963

22. Nawaz M. A., Seshadri U., Kumar P., Aqdas R., Patwary A. K., Riaz M. Nexus between green finance and climate change mitigation in N-11 and BRICS countries: Empirical estimation through difference in differences (DID) approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28(6):6504-6519. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10920-y

23. Mensi W., Shafiullah M., Vo X.V., Kang S. H. Volatility spillovers between strategic commodity futures and stock markets and portfolio implications: Evidence from developed and emerging economies. Resources Policy. 2021;71:102002. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102002

24. Samitas A., Kampouris E., Umar Z. Financial contagion in real economy: The key role of policy uncertainty. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 2022;27(2):1633-1682. DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2235

25. Zhang X., Wang Z. Marketization vs. market chase: Insights from implicit government guarantees. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2020;69:435-455. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.021

26. Ferriani F. From taper tantrum to COVID-19: Portfolio flows to emerging markets in periods of stress. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2021;74:101391. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101391

27. Antonakakis N., Cunado J., Filis G., Gabauer D., de Gracia F. P. Dynamic connectedness among the implied volatilities of oil prices and financial assets: New evidence of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2023;83:114-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2022.08.009

28. Ahmad M., Jan I., Jabeen G., Alvarado R. Does energy-industry investment drive economic performance in regional China: Implications for sustainable development. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2021;27:176-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.033

29. García-Herrero A., Tan J. Deglobalisation in the context of United States-China decoupling. Policy Contribution. 2020;(21):1-16. URL: https://www.bruegel.org/system/files/wp_attachments/PC-21-2020-211220.pdf

30. Cheema M. A., Faff R., Szulczyk K. R. The 2008 global financial crisis and COVID-19 pandemic: How safe are the safe haven assets? International Review of Financial Analysis. 2022;83:102316. DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102316

31. Ozili P. K. Green finance research around the world: A review of literature. International Journal of Green Economics. 2022;16(1):56-75. DOI: 10.1504/IJGE.2022.10048432

32. Khan A.A., Laghari A.A., Shafiq M., Cheikhrouhou O., Alhakami W., Hamam H., Shaikh Z.A. Healthcare ledger management: A blockchain and machine learning-enabled novel and secure architecture for medical industry. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences. 2022;12:1-14. DOI: 10.22967/HCIS.2022.12.055

33. Shaikh Z.A., Khoja S.A. Higher education in Pakistan: An ICT integration viewpoint. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering. 2013;5(3):410-413. DOI: 10.7763/IJCTE.2013.V5.720

34. Wang M. C., Chang T., Mikhaylov A., Linyu J. A measure of quantile-on-quantile connectedness for the US treasury yield curve spread, the US dollar, and gold price. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 2024;74:102232. DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2024.102232

35. Mikhaylov A., Bhatti M. I.M. The link between DFA portfolio performance, AI financial management, GDP, government bonds growth and DFA trade volumes. Quality and Quantity. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-01940-8

36. An J., Mikhaylov A. Yu., Yousif N. B.A. Financial and investment model for social security and sustainable economic growth. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(5):133-145. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28- 5-133-145

37. An J., Mikhaylov A. Yu. Current waste management in banks from 11 Asian countries vs Sberbank ESG reporting. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2023;27(6):173-184. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-6-173-184