Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

Assessing the Impact of a “Futures & Options” Course on Finance Majors: Insights from a Futures & Options Course Study in China

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-1-1583-04

Abstract

The “Futures & Options” (F&O) course is a major for financial students to learn to identify and recognize risks, master the skills and methods of risk management, and shape risk-oriented thinking. The purpose of the study is to identify the impact of the F&O course on the professional thinking, life and future work of students. This study used a survey on finance students (n = 534) of Tongling University of China who have studied F&O course over the past two years. Research questions: (1) How do students currently perceive the F&O course? (2) What factors influence the current perception of F&O students? (3) Does the impact of the F&O course on life/future employment and student development vary by gender? (4) Does the impact of the F&O course on life/future employment and student development vary depending on their knowledge of futures and options? (5) Does the impact of the F&O course on the life/future work and development of students vary depending on their participation in equity and fund investments? (6) Will the impact of the F&O course on the life/future employment and development of students vary depending on their participation in futures and options investments? The results of the study showed that the level of knowledge of male students was slightly higher than that of female students, and there were no gender differences in the impact of the F&O course on the life/future employment and development of students. Students who identified themselves with higher value of usefulness and ability of risk management did not participate in investing F&O. Students with higher knowledge level perform better than the others. It was concluded that, in general, the level of knowledge of students is better within the current educational model, the readiness of students to participate in practice is low, and the cultivation of risk awareness is not ideal.

About the Authors

Z. Zhang
Tongling University
China

Zhong Zhang — PhD, Finance School

Tongling


Competing Interests:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.



H. Tinmaz
Woosong University
Korea, Republic of

Hasan Tinmaz — PhD, AI & Big Data Department, Endicott College of International Studies

Daejeon


Competing Interests:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.



References

1. Hull J., Treepongkaruna S., Colwell D., Heaney R., Pitt D. Fundamentals of futures and options markets. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Higher Education AU; 2013. 566 p.

2. Refrigeri L., Aleandri G. The economics of education as educational science. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;116:2059–2063. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.519

3. Corsini L., Giannelli G. C. Economics education and financial literacy acquisition: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. 2021;32:100556. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100556

4. Machin S. Developments in economics of education research. Labour Economics. 2014;30:13–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2014.06.003

5. Self J. K., Becker W. E. Teaching and learning alternatives to a comparative advantage motivation for trade. The American Economist. 2016;61(2):178–190. DOI: 10.1177/0569434516652042

6. Hanushek E. A., Woessmann L. Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. Journal of Economic Growth. 2012;17(4):267–321. DOI: 10.1007/s10887-012-9081-x

7. Förster M., Happ R., Walstad W. B. Relations between young adults’ knowledge and understanding, experiences, and information behavior in personal finance matters. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training. 2019;11:1–21. DOI: 10.1186/s40461-019-0077-z

8. Molina-García A., Cisneros-Ruiz A.J., López-Subires M.D., Diéguez-Soto J. How does financial literacy influence undergraduates’ risk-taking propensity? The International Journal of Management Education. 2023;21(3):100840. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100840

9. Bolton D., Galloway C. The holistic dilemma: Helping management students deal with risk. The International Journal of Management Education. 2014;12(2):55–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2014.01.001

10. Hao J., He F., Liu-Chen B., Li Z. Price discovery and its determinants for the Chinese soybean options and futures markets. Finance Research Letters. 2021;40:101689. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101689

11. Ma Z., Ma C., Wu Z. Closed-form analytical solutions for options on agricultural futures with seasonality and stochastic convenience yield. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 2020;137:109849. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109849

12. Diersen M. A., Wang Z. Trading commodity futures and options in a student-managed fund. Applied Economics Teaching Resources. 2022;4(1):1–11. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.320044

13. Massa O. I., Ramsey A. F. Student-managed commodity fund — a new frontier in experiential learning. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 2020;52(1):64–77. DOI: 10.1017/aae.2019.33

14. Tinmaz H., Lee J. H. General and instructional perceptions of South Korean messenger: ‘KakaoTalk’. International Journal of Learning and Change. 2020;12(2):143–168. DOI: 10.1504/IJLC.2020.106715

15. Sürücü L., Maslakçi A. Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal. 2020;8(3):2694–2726. DOI: 10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540

16. Tavakol M., Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education. 2011;2:53–55. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

17. Shrestha N. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2021;9(1):4–11. DOI: 10.12691/ajams-9-1-2

18. Knekta E., Runyon C., Eddy S. One size doesn’t fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE — Life Sciences Education. 2019;18(1): rm1. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064

19. Elfahmi R., Solikin I., Nugraha N. Model of student investment intention with financial knowledge as a predictor that moderated by financial selfefficacy and perceived risk. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting. 2020;1(1):165–175. DOI: 10.38035/dijefa.v1i1.232

20. Garrison S. T., Gutter M. S. 2010 outstanding AFCPE® conference paper: Gender differences in financial socialization and willingness to take financial risks. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning. 2010;21(2):60–72.

21. Li J. The teaching research of futures and options course. In: 2021 2 nd Asia-Pacific conference on image processing, electronics and computers (IPEC-2021). (Dalian, April 14–16, 2021). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery; 2021:1043–1046. DOI: 10.1145/3452446.3452695

22. Chance D. M., Brooks R. An introduction to derivatives and risk management. Andover: Cengage Learning; 2015. 640 p.

23. Adam-Müller A.F.A., Panaretou A. Risk management with options and futures under liquidity risk. The Journal of Futures Markets. 2009;29(4):297–318. DOI: 10.1002/fut.20362


Review

For citations:


Zhang Z., Tinmaz H. Assessing the Impact of a “Futures & Options” Course on Finance Majors: Insights from a Futures & Options Course Study in China. Finance: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-1-1583-04

Views: 89


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)