Development of Decentralized Finance in Comparable Indicators of the Financial Sector of the Economy
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-2-20-35
Abstract
The sphere of decentralized finance is the subject of widespread debate as the ways of providing services in the financial market. Using distributed registry technologies, smart contacts and a decentralized format of cooperation, it is capable, to a certain extent, of replacing traditional financial intermediaries in some product segments of the financial market. The authors set the task of identifying possible markers of liquidity flow into the sphere of decentralized finance, as well as assessing the scale and dynamics of its development compared with segments of the financial sector of the economy. The purpose of the study is to form a system of comparable indicators, based on which national regulators will be able to objectively assess the scale and dynamics of development of the DeFi sector. To achieve the goal, the article conducted a quantitative analysis of the relationship between changes in the money supply and the total value locked of crypto assets in the DeFi sector; a comparative analysis of various segments of the DeFi sphere and the financial sector of the economy was carried out. As the main methods, the authors used methods of regression analysis, systemic and logical methods, induction and deduction, methods of economic statistics, which made it possible to identify tendencies in the development of the sphere of decentralized finance against the background of indicators of development of the financial sector of the economy. The source data consisted of statistical databases on key indicators of the development of the financial sector of the economy at the international level, as well as databases on services provided by participants of decentralized finance. As a result of the study, the impact of changes in money supply on total value locked in DeFi is evaluated, as well as tendencies and scale of development of the sphere of decentralized finance in comparable indicators of the financial sector of the economy are identified. It is concluded that the scale of the current development of decentralized finance is not significant. However, according to a number of comparable indicators, this sphere already represents a certain parity with the financial sector of the economy. First of all, this applies to the trading turnover of decentralized exchanges and the volume of trading in crypto derivatives. The results of the study can be used by national regulators when assessing the scale of development of the sphere of decentralized finance under certain monetary and financial conditions.
Keywords
JEL: E4, G1, G2
About the Authors
M. A. AbramovaRussian Federation
Marina A. Abramova — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Head of the Department of Banking and Monetary Regulation of the Faculty of Finance, Leading Researcher of the Institute of Financial Research of the Faculty of Finance
Moscow
S. V. Krivoruchko
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Krivoruchko — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Prof. of the Department of Banking and Monetary Regulation of the Faculty of Finance, Leading Researcher of the Institute of Financial Research of the Faculty of Finance
Moscow
O. V. Lunyakov
Russian Federation
Oleg V. Lunyakov — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof. of the Department of Banking and Monetary Regulation of the Faculty of Finance, Researcher of the Institute of Financial Research of the Faculty of Finance
Moscow
A. B. Fiapshev
Russian Federation
Alim B. Fiapshev — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Prof. of the Department of Banking and Monetary Regulation of the Faculty of Finance, Researcher of the Institute of Financial Research of the Faculty of Finance
Moscow
References
1. Caldarelli G., Ellul J. The blockchain oracle problem in decentralized finance — a multivocal approach. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(16):7572. DOI: 10.3390/app11167572
2. Grassi L., Lanfranchi D., Faes A., Renga F. M. Do we still need financial intermediation? The case of decentralized finance — DeFi. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. 2022;19(3):323-347. DOI: 10.1108/0RAM-03-2021-0051
3. Schueffel P. DeFi: Decentralized finance — an introduction and overview. Journal of Innovation Management. 2021;9(3):1-9. DOI: 10.24840/2183-0606_009.003_0001
4. Zetzsche D. A., Arner D. W., Buckley R. P. Decentralized finance. Journal of Financial Regulation. 2020;6(2):172-203. DOI: 10.1093/jfr/fjaa010
5. Saengchote K. Where do DeFi stablecoins go? A closer look at what DeFi composability really means. SSRNElectronic Journal. 2021. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3893487
6. Koshelev K. A. Trends in the evolution of the digital financial assets market in the context of the digital transformation of the global economy. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(4):80-94. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-4-80-94
7. Aramonte S., Huang W., Schrimpf A. DeFi risks and the decentralization illusion. BIS Quarterly Review. 2021;(Dec.). URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt2112b.pdf (accessed on 22.01.2024).
8. Carter N., Jeng L. DeFi protocol risks: The paradox of DeFi. In: Coen B., Maurice D. R., eds. Regtech, suptech and beyond: Innovation in financial services. London: RiskBooks; 2021.
9. Kaur S., Singh S., Gupta S. Wats S. Risk analysis in decentralized finance (DeFi): A fuzzy-AHP approach. Risk Management. 2023;25(2):13. DOI: 10.1057/s41283-023-00118-0
10. Abdulhakeem A., Hu 0. Powered by blockchain technology, DeFi (decentralized finance) strives to increase financial inclusion of the unbanked by reshaping the world financial system. Modern Economy. 2021;12(1):1-16. DOI: 10.4236/me.2021.121001
11. Calcaterra C., Kaal W. Decentralized finance (DeFi). In: Decentralization: Technology’s impact on organizational and societal structure. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH; 2021.
12. Makarov I., Schoar A. Cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance. BIS Working Papers. 2022;(1061). URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/work1061.pdf (accessed on 25.03.2024).
13. Werner S., Perez D., Gudgeon L., Klages-Mundt A., Harz D., Knottenbelt W. SoK: Decentralized finance (DeFi). 2021. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348675097_SoK_Decentralized_Finance_ DeFi (accessed on 05.03.2024).
14. Kitzler S., Victor F., Saggese P., Haslhofer B. Disentangling decentralized finance (DeFi) compositions. ACM Transactions on the Web. 2023;17(2):10. DOI: 10.1145/3532857
15. Chohan U. W. Decentralized finance (DeFi): An emergent alternative financial architecture. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3791921
16. Qin K., Zhou L., Afonin Y., Lazzaretti L., Gervais A. CeFi vs. DeFi — comparing centralized to decentralized finance. 2021. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.08157 (accessed on 20.04.2024).
17. Momtaz P. How efficient is decentralized finance (DeFi)? SSRNElectronic Journal. 2022. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4063670
18. Corbet S., Goodell J.W,, Gunay S. What drives DeFi prices? Investigating the effects of investor attention. Finance Research Letters. 2022;48:102883. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.102883
19. Metelski D., Sobieraj J. Decentralized finance (DeFi) projects: A study of key performance indicators in terms of DeFi protocols’ valuations. International Journal of Financial Studies. 2022;10(4):108. DOI: 10.3390/ijfs10040108
20. Dahlberg T., Dabaja F. Decentralized finance and the crypto market: Indicators and correlations. Bachelor thesis in economics. Linkoping: Linkoping University; 2021. 38 p. URL: https://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1579302/FULLTEXT02.pdf
21. Maouchi Y., Charfeddine L., El Montasser G. Understanding digital bubbles amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from DeFi and NFTs. Finance Research Letters. 2022;47A:102584. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102584
22. Tobin J. Money and economic growth. Econometrica. 1965;33(4):671-684. DOI: 10.2307/1910352
Review
For citations:
Abramova M.A., Krivoruchko S.V., Lunyakov O.V., Fiapshev A.B. Development of Decentralized Finance in Comparable Indicators of the Financial Sector of the Economy. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(2):20-35. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-2-20-35