Financing Patterns of Russian Innovative Enterprises: Empirical Evidence
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-3-166-178
Abstract
Different financial resources are used to finance the operational and innovative activities of enterprises, forming the structure of their capital. Many studies have been conducted on the topic of businesses’ access to external financial resources, such as loans. However, the topic of the relationship of financing patterns with the results of innovation activity and the innovative potential of enterprises is still insufficiently studied. The aim of this article is to identify patterns of financing Russian enterprises, as well as the specifics of financing innovative enterprises. As the main research method, we used cluster analysis, which was conducted for two groups of Russian enterprises — large and small and mediumsized (SMEs) businesses. The study is based on data from a survey of Russian companies conducted by the World Bank. The results show that large enterprises use five financial patterns: equity, trading, loans, mixed financing, and government subsidies. SMEs, on the contrary, are limited to the first four patterns. Special attention was paid to innovative companies, among which most large enterprises rely on their own funds as the main source of financing. At the same time, small and medium-sized innovative enterprises demonstrate a more flexible financial strategy, using a wider range of sources to ensure their innovation activities. The data obtained is of great importance for the development of effective tools to support innovation. Taking into account the identified features of the financial structure of companies, it is necessary to develop measures aimed at stimulating innovation, taking into account the specifics of various types of enterprises. This will not only increase the innovative potential of Russian companies, but also strengthen their positions in the domestic and global markets.
About the Authors
O. N. KorablevaRussian Federation
Olga N. Korableva — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof. in the Department of Enterprise Economics, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Faculty of Economics
Saint-Petersburg
A. Maarouf
Russian Federation
Ali F. Maarouf — Graduate of the Рostgraduate scientific and pedagogical training program in Economics
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Aghion P., Blundell R., Griffith R., Howitt P., Prantl S. The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2009;91(1):20-32. DOI: 10.1162/rest.91.1.20
2. Law S.H., Sarmidi T., Goh L.T. Impact of innovation on economic growth: Evidence from Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies. 2020;57(1):113-132. DOI: 10.22452/MJES.vol57no1.6
3. Lomachynska I., Podgorna I.Innovation potential: Impact on the national economy’s competitiveness of the EU developed countries. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2018;4(1):262-270. DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-262-270
4. Gokhberg L., Kuznetsova T. Strategy 2020: New outlines of Russian innovation policy. Forsait. 2011;5(4):8-30. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1995-459X.2011.4.8.30
5. Ivanov D., Kuzyk M., Simachev Yu. Fostering innovation performance of Russian manufacturing enterprises: New opportunities and limitations. Forsait. 2012;6(2):18-41. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1995-459x.2012.2.18.41
6. Spielkamp A., Rammer C. Financing of innovations — thresholds and options. Management & Marketing. 2009;4(2):3-18. URL: http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/132.pdf
7. Czarnitzki D., Hottenrott H. Financing constraints for industrial innovation: What do we know? Review of Business and Economics. 2010;(3):346-362. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315387638_Financing_Constraints_for_Industrial_Innovation_What_Do_We_Know
8. Guriev S., Lazareva O., Rachinsky A., Tsukhlo S. Corporate governance in Russian industry. Problems of Economic Transition. 2004;47(3):6-83. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11870268.pdf
9. Manshilin S.A., Leshchinskaya A.F. Model of financial incentives for innovation activity in industrial sector: Development and forecasting of efficiency. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(2):74-87. DOI: 10.26794/2587- 5671-2022-26-2-74-87
10. Shestak V.P.Incentive funding for innovative activities. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2017;21(5):40-49. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2017-21-5-40-49
11. Czerwonka L., Jaworski J. Capital structure determinants of small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2021;28(2):277-279. DOI: 10.1108/JSBED 09-2020-0326
12. Kumar S., Sureka R., Colombage S. Capital structure of SMEs: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly. 2020;70(4):535-565. DOI: 10.1007/s11301-019-00175-4
13. Poutziouris P., Markou D., Glyptis L., Hadjielias Ε. Capital structure of UK SMEs: An integrated understanding. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business. 2022; 46(1):64-95. DOI: 10.1504/IJESB.2022.123986
14. Oliynyk-Dunn O., Wasilewski M., Kvasha S., Adamenko V. Financial system development and financing patterns of firms: Evidence from Ukraine. Journal of East-West Business. 2020;26(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1080/10669868.2019.1630045
15. Beck T., Demirgüç-Kunt A., Martinez Peria M.S. Banking services for everyone? Barriers to bank access and use around the world. The World Bank Economic Review. 2008;22(3):397-430. DOI: 10.1093/wber/lhn020
16. Beck T., Demirguc-Kunt A. Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2006;30(11):2931-2943. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.009 17. Hanousek J. Shamshur A. A stubborn persistence: Is the stability of leverage ratios determined by the stability of the economy? Journal of Corporate Finance. 2011;17(5):1360-1376. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.07.004
17. Jõeveer K. Firm, country and macroeconomic determinants of capital structure: Evidence from transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2013;41(1):294-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2012.05.001
18. Maarouf A., Korableva O.N. Credit constraints and innovation activities: Empirical evidence on Russian enterprises. International Journal of Technology. 2022;13(2):254-263. DOI: 10.14716/ijtech.v13i2.4835
19. Di Pietro F., Bontempi M.E., Palacín-Sánchez M.J., Samaniego-Medina R.Capital structure across Italian regions: The role of financial and economic differences. Sustainability. 2019;11(16):4474. DOI: 10.3390/su11164474
20. Bragoli D., Cortelezzi F., Marseguerra G. R&D, capital structure and ownership concentration: Evidence from Italian microdata. Industry and Innovation. 2016;23(3):223-242. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1145573
21. Serrasqueiro Z., Nunes P.M., da Rocha Armada M. Capital structure decisions: Old issues, new insights from high-tech small- and medium-sized enterprises. The European Journal of Finance. 2016;22(1):59-79. DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2014.946068
22. Mancusi M.L., Vezzulli A. R&D and credit rationing in SMEs. Economic Inquiry. 2014;52(3):1153-1172. DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12080
23. Moritz A., Block J.H., Heinz A. Financing patterns of European SMEs — an empirical taxonomy. Venture Capital. 2016;18(2):115-148. DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2016.1145900
24. Masiak C., Block J.H., Moritz A., Lang F., Kraemer-Eis H. Financing micro firms in Europe: An empirical analysis. EIF Working Paper. 2017;(44). URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/176674/1/eif-wp 44.pdf
25. Belitz H., Lejpras A. Financing patterns of R&D in small and medium-sized enterprises and the perception of innovation barriers in Germany. Science and Public Policy. 2016;43(2):245-261. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scv027
26. Belitz H., Lejpras A. Financing patterns of innovative SMEs and the perception of innovation barriers in Germany. DIW Discussion Papers. 2014;(1353). URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/90900/1/77707947X.pdf
27. Masiak C., Block J. H., Moritz A., Lang F., Kraemer-Eis H. How do micro fi rms differ in their fi nancing patterns from larger SMEs? Venture Capital. 2019;21(4):301-325. DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2019.1569333
28. Błach J., Wieczorek-Kosmala M., Trzęsiok J. Innovation in SMEs and fi nancing mix. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2020;13(9):206. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm13090206
29. Hall B. H., Lerner J. The fi nancing of R&D and innovation. In: Hall B. H., Rosenberg N., eds. Handbook of the economics of innovation. Amsterdam: North Holland; 2010;1:609-639. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2
30. Kerr W. R., Nanda R. Financing innovation. Annual Review of Financial Economics. 2015;7:445-462. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fi nancial-111914-041825
31. Backhaus K., Erichson B., Plinke W., Weiber R. Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Gabler; 2016. 647 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-46076-4
32. Masiak C., Moritz A. Lang F. Financing patterns of European SMEs revisited: An updated empirical taxonomy and determinants of SME financing clusters. EIF Working Paper. 2017;(40). URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/176670/1/eif-wp-40.pdf
Review
For citations:
Korableva O.N., Maarouf A. Financing Patterns of Russian Innovative Enterprises: Empirical Evidence. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(3):166-178. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-3-166-178