Structural Analysis of Economic Growth: The Distributed Effects of Policy Instruments
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-4-71-87
Abstract
The article examines the structure of the growth of the Russian economy in the period 2003–2023. The macroeconomic policy proceeds from linking the instrument to a specific development goal, although in practice the entire set of tools affects the target parameters and economic structure, thereby generating opportunities for its contribution to the rate of economic growth and reduction of inflation. The purpose of the research is to conduct a structural analysis of Russia’s economic growth with the allocation of the distributed impact on the growth rate, inflation and economic structure (by GDP) of the following main macroeconomic policy instruments: the key interest rate, monetization level, exchange rate and budget surplus/deficit. The research methodology is represented by the theory of economic growth, structural analysis, regression models, econometric approach, and statistical data processing. The information base of the study was compiled from Rosstat and the World Bank. The result is a constructed algorithm for structural analysis of growth with an assessment of the distributed impact of policy instruments and an empirical study of the Russian economy, which confirmed the different strengths of the influence of applied policy instruments not only on growth and inflation, but also on the economic structure (raw materials, processing and transaction sectors), as well as the different effects of structural elements on price dynamics and GDP, shaped by the ongoing macroeconomic policy. Such a result in the long term leads to the need to correct the instruments used in terms of the strength and nature of their action, and also allows us to take into account the formulation of structural change tasks together with the macroeconomic policy measures being formed aimed at ensuring the growth rate at relatively low price dynamics.
About the Authors
O. S. SukharevRussian Federation
Oleg S. Sukharev — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Chief Researcher
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
E. N. Voronchikhina
Russian Federation
Ekaterina N. Voronchikhina — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Department of World and Regional Economics
Perm
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
References
1. Barre R. Economie politique. En 2 vols. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (PUF); 1966. 1517 p. (Russ. ed.: Barre R. Politicheskaya ekonomiya. In 2 vols. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya; 1996. 1360 p.).
2. Leontief W.W. Selected articles. Transl. from Eng. St. Petersburg: Nevskoe Vremya; 1994. 366 p. (In Russ.).
3. Yaremenko Yu.V. Theory and methodology of studying multilevel economy. Selected works in 3 books. Bk. 1. Moscow: Nauka; 2000. 400 p. (In Russ.).
4. Anchishkin A.I. Science, technology, economics. Moscow: Ekonomika; 1986. 383 p. (In Russ.).
5. Gabardo F.A., Pereima J.B., Einloft P. The incorporation of structural change into growth theory: A historical appraisal. EconomiA. 2017;18(3):392–410. DOI: 10.1016/j.econ.2017.05.003
6. Glazyev S. Yu. Theory of long-term technical and economic development. Moscow: Vladar; 1993. 310 p. (In Russ.).
7. Glazyev S. Yu. Nanotechnology as a key factor in the new technological order in the economy. Moscow: Trovant; 2009. 304 p. (In Russ.).
8. Glazyev S. Yu. Chinese economic miracle: Lessons for Russia and the world. Moscow: Ves’ mir; 2023. 406 p. (In Russ.).
9. Kapitsa S.P. Essay on the theory of human growth. Demographic revolution and information society. Moscow: Lenand; 2022. 128 p. (In Russ.).
10. Lucas R.E. Lectures on economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004. 224 p. (Russ. ed.: Lucas R.E. Lektsii po ekonomicheskomu rostu. Moscow: Gaydar Institute Publ.; 2013. 288 p.).
11. Tinbergen J. Economic policy: Principles and design. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.; 1956. 276 p.
12. Alonso-Carrera J., Raurich X. Labor mobility, structural change and economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics. 2018;56:292–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2018.03.002
13. Brancaccio E., Garbellini N., Giammetti R. Structural labour market reforms, GDP growth and the functional distribution of income. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2018;44:34–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2017.09.001
14. Cardinale I., Galbraith J., Scazzieri R. Structural dynamics and the wealth of nations. Luigi Pasinetti’s system of economic theory. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2024;69:692–698. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2023.11.019
15. Miles D. Macroeconomic impacts of changes in life expectancy and fertility. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing. 2023;24:100425. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2022.100425
16. Erumban A.A., Das D.K., Aggarwal S., Das P.C. Structural change and economic growth in India. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2019;51:186–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.07.006
17. Zhao J., Tang J. Industrial structure change and economic growth: A China-Russia comparison. China Economic Review. 2018;47:219–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2017.08.008
18. Vu K. M. Structural change and economic growth: Empirical evidence and policy insights from Asian economies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2017;41:64–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2017.04.002
19. Samaniego R.M., Sun J.Y. Productivity growth and structural transformation. Review of Economic Dynamics. 2016;21:266–285. DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2015.06.003
20. Freire C. Economic diversification: A model of structural economic dynamics and endogenous technological change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2019;49:13–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.03.005
21. Romano L., Traù F. The nature of industrial development and the speed of structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2017;42:26–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2017.05.003
22. Cutrini E. Economic integration, structural change, and uneven development in the European Union. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2019;50:102–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.06.007
23. Pi J., Zhang P. Structural change and wage inequality. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2018;58:699–707. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2018.07.010
24. Yamada T. Income risk, macroeconomic and demographic change, and economic inequality in Japan. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2012;36(1):63–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2011.07.001
25. Lu Y. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2017:6:1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005
26. Bazarov V.A. Selected works. In 2 vols. Moscow: Delo; 2014. Vol. 1–504 p.; Vol. 2–512 p. (In Russ.).
27. Crafts N. The First Industrial Revolution: Resolving the slow growth/rapid industrialization paradox. Journal of the European Economic Association. 2005;3(2/3):525–534. DOI: 10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2–3.525
28. Cooper G. The origin of financial crises: Central banks, credit bubbles, and the efficient market fallacy. New York, NY: Vintage Books; 2008. 200 p. (Russ. ed.: Cooper G. Priroda finansovykh krizisov. Tsentral’nye banki, kreditnye puzyri i zabluzhdeniya effektivnogo rynka. Moscow: BestBusinessBooks; 2008. 210 p.).
29. Sukharev O. S., Voronchikhina E. N. Financial and non-financial investments: comparative econometric analysis of the impact on economic dynamics. Quantitative Finance and Economics. 2020,4(3):382–411. DOI: 10.3934/QFE.2020018
30. Sukharev O. S., Voronchikhina E. N. Inflation targeting: Eliminating economic growth and structural deformation in Russia. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(1):6–19. DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671–2024–28– 1–6–19
31. O.S. Structural analysis of income and risk dynamics in models of economic growth. Quantitative Finance and Economics. 2020;4(1):1–18. DOI: 10.3934/QFE.2020001
Review
For citations:
Sukharev O.S., Voronchikhina E.N. Structural Analysis of Economic Growth: The Distributed Effects of Policy Instruments. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(4):71-87. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-4-71-87