Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Practices and Their Financial Implications: A Study of Indonesia and Malaysia Capital Markets

As environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations gain prominence, companies are increasingly integrating ESG factors into their decision-making processes. While extensive research has examined ESG in developed markets, limited studies explore its impact on emerging economies. This study investigates whether ESG scores are positively associated with a firm’s market value and profitability in Indonesia and Malaysia. The study utilizes panel data from Refinitiv Eikon and World Bank covering the period 2010–2022. The sample consists of 421 firm-year observations from non-Shariah-compliant companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. The analysis employs random-effects and fixedeffects panel regressions to assess the relationship between ESG scores and corporate financial performance, measured by Tobin’s Q (market value), Return on Assets (ROA), and Return on Equity (ROE). The results indicate a positive and significant relationship between ESG scores and both market value (coefficient = 3.655) and ROE (coefficient = 0.007), suggesting that strong ESG performance enhances firm valuation and shareholder returns. However, the study finds a negative and significant association between ESG and ROA (coefficient = –0.000024), implying that ESG integration may not consistently improve asset efficiency. These findings highlight the mixed financial effects of ESG adoption in emerging markets. The study underscores the need for greater ESG awareness in Indonesia and Malaysia, particularly in guiding companies toward sustainability-driven financial strategies. As ESG integration continues to shape investment decisions, understanding its nuanced impact on financial performance is critical for stakeholders navigating evolving market expectations.

1. Reber B., Gold A., Gold S. ESG disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in initial public offerings. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022;179(3):867–886. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–021–04847–8

2. Espinosa-Méndez C., Maquieira C., Arias J.T. ESG performance on the value of family firms: International evidence during COVID‑19. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. 2024;11(1):586. DOI: 10.1057/s41599–024–03074–6

3. Chiek A. N., Kean C.C., Loo H. L.P., Ling N.S. The cyclic relationship between environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and corporate financial performance (CFP) in a regional economy. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought. 2021;11(1):79–93. DOI: 10.37134/jcit.vol11.7.2021

4. Chouaibi S., Chouaibi J., Rossi M. ESG and corporate financial performance: The mediating role of green innovation. UK common law versus Germany civil law. EuroMed Journal of Business. 2022;17(1):46–71. DOI: 10.1108/EMJB‑09–2020–0101

5. Ismail A.M., Azman K.B.B. The impact of environmental, social and governance performance on financial performance: Evidence from Japanese companies. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology. 2024;8(3):236–258. DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i3.950

6. Lee M.T., Suh I. Understanding the effects of environment, social, and governance conduct on financial performance: Arguments for a process and integrated modelling approach. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship. 2022;1(1):100004. DOI: 10.1016/j.stae.2022.100004

7. Freeman R.E. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984. 362 p. 8.  Freeman R.E., Dmytriyev S. Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory: Learning from each other. Symphonia: Emerging Issues in Management. 2017;(1)7–15. DOI: 10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev

8. Sternberg E. The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance. 1997;5(1):3–10. DOI: 10.1111/1467–8683.00034

9. Gangi F., Daniele L.M., Varrone N. How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect riskadjusted financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020;29(5):1975–1991. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2482

10. Chouaibi S., Rossi M., Siggia D., Chouaibi J. Exploring the moderating role of social and ethical practices in the relationship between environmental disclosure and financial performance: Evidence from ESG companies. Sustainability. 2022;14(1):209. DOI: 10.3390/su14010209

11. Russo M.V., Fouts P.A. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. The Academy of Management Journal. 1997;40(3):534–559. DOI: 10.2307/257052

12. Zhou G., Liu L., Luo S. Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022;31(7):3371–3387. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3089

13. Shabbir M.S., Aslam E., Irshad A., et al. Nexus between corporate social responsibility and financial and nonfinancial sectors’ performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27(31):39164–39179. DOI: 10.1007/s11356–020–09972-x

14. Candio P. The effect of ESG and CSR attitude on financial performance in Europe: A quantitative re-examination. Journal of Environmental Management. 2024;354:120390. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120390

15. Aslam E., Haron R. The influence of corporate governance on intellectual capital efficiency: Evidence from Islamic banks of OIC countries. Asian Journal of Accounting Research. 2020;5(2):195–208. DOI: 10.1108/AJAR‑05–2020–0030

16. Al-Matari E. M. Do corporate governance and top management team diversity have a financial impact among financial sector? A further analysis. Cogent Business & Management. 2022;9(1):2141093. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2141093

17. Zureigat B.N., Al-hazimeh A.M., Batayneh R., Alrawashedh N.H. Does board of directors affect financial performance? A study of the Jordanian companies. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 2024;12(3):1441–1450. DOI: 10.5267/juscm.2024.007

18. Kiptoo I.K., Kariuki S.N., Ocharo K.N. Corporate governance and financial performance of insurance firms in Kenya. Cogent Business & Management. 2021;8(1):1938350. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1938350

19. Cardoso G., Carr D.D., Rogers P. Does corporate governance matter for stock returns volatility in the Brazilian context? Corporate Governance. 2019;19(6):1236–1252. DOI: 10.1108/CG‑03–2019–0083

20. Kurniawan I., Rokhim R. Is ESG companies’ performance influenced by ownership structure? Evidence in ASEAN. Interdisciplinary Social Studies. 2023;2(9):2397–2413. DOI: 10.55324/iss.v2i9.485

21. Nazarova V., Lavrova V. Do ESG factors influence investment attractiveness of the public companies? Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2022;16(1):38–64. DOI: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073–0438.16.1.2022.38–64

22. Ji L., Sun Y., Liu J., Chiu Y. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and market efficiency of China’s commercial banks under market competition. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023;30(9):24533– 24552. DOI: 10.1007/s11356–022–23742-x

23. Peng L.S., Isa M. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and performance in Shariah firms: Agency or stakeholder theory? Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance. 2020;16(1):1–34. DOI: 10.21315/aamjaf2020.16.1.1

24. Qoyum A., Al Hashfi R.U., Zusryn A.S., Kusuma H., Qizam I. Does an Islamic-SRI portfolio really matter? Empirical application of valuation models in Indonesia. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2021;21(2):105–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2020.08.002

25. Duque-Grisales E., Aguilera-Caracuel J. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of Multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics. 2019;168(2):315–334. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–019–04177-w

26. Nguyen H.T. How ESG activities improve corporate stock performance during the COVID‑19 crisis. Master’s theses. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit; 2022. 46 p. URL: https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/server/api/core/bitstreams/b3e5cf09-c70c‑44e4–89cb-d4a25b31b4d8/content

27. Wong W.C., Batten J.A., Ahmad A.H., et al. Does ESG certification add firm value? Finance Research Letters. 2021;39:101593. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101593 29.  Al-Hiyari A., Ismail A.I., Kolsi M.C., Kehinde O.H. Environmental, social and governance performance (ESG) and firm investment efficiency in emerging markets: The interaction effect of board cultural diversity. Corporate Governance. 2023;23(3):650–673. DOI: 10.1108/CG‑03–2022–0133 30.  Habermann F., Fischer F.B. Corporate social performance and the likelihood of bankruptcy: Evidence from a period of economic upswing. Journal of Business Ethics. 2023;182(1):243–259. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–021–04956–4

28. Rooh S., Zahid M., Malik M.F., Tahir M. Corporate governance characteristics and environmental, social & governance (ESG) performance: Evidence from the banking sector of Pakistan. Journal of Business and Tourism. 2021;7(1):35–50. DOI: 10.34260/jbt.v7i1.218

29. Zhou G., Liu L., Luo S. Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022;37(7):3371–3387. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3089

30. Ray R.S., Goel S. Impact of ESG score on financial performance of Indian firms: Static and dynamic panel regression analyses. Applied Economics. 2023;55(15):1742–1755. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2101611

31. Baltagi B.H. Econometric analysis of panel data. 5th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2005. 317 p.

32. Dess G.G., Beard D.W. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1984;29(1):52–73. DOI: 10.2307/2393080

33. Talan G., Sharma G. D. From business goals to societal goals via sustainable investment: An integrative review and research agenda. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development. 2020;16(1):108–124. DOI: 10.1504/WREMSD.2020.105530

34. Friede G., Lewis M., Bassen A., Busch T. ESG & corporate financial performance: Mapping the global landscape. London: Deutsche Asset &Wealth Management; 2015. 16 p. URL: https://finansdanmark.dk/media/bvdirlmm/k15090_academic_insights_us_rz_online_151216.pdf