Factors Affecting Investor Adoption of Online Stockbrokers
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-5-2100-02
Abstract
After the COVID-19 pandemic, a surge in new stock investors, motivated by the pursuit of alternative income, fear of missing out, and social media influence, has heightened global stock market activity. This surge underscored the necessity of online stockbrokers as streamlined platforms for facilitating communications with investors and executing their transactions. This study investigates the adoption of online stockbrokers among Indonesian investors, focusing on both desktop and mobile users to provide a holistic understanding of the domain. Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology framework with additional constructs — System Quality, Perceived Reputation, Trust, Risk, and Price Value — this research examines diverse factors influencing investor adoption. Using survey data from 143 investors and analyzing it with Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling, the study identifies the pivotal roles of performance expectancy, system quality, and social dynamics like perceived reputation and social influence as significant predictors of adoption. The findings reflect a shift from traditional, personalized stockbroker interactions to accessible, efficient digital platforms and emphasize the critical role of social dynamics in driving the adoption of financial services. Lastly, the study offers theoretical insights and practical recommendations for advancing financial services, particularly in contexts where users prioritize high complexity and feature-rich platforms, by highlighting the critical factors driving online stockbroker adoption.
Keywords
JEL: C30, G24, G41, L86, 016
About the Authors
M.A.J. YohanesIndonesia
Marco A. J. Yohanes — Undergraduate student, Faculty of Business and Economics
Surabaya, Indonesia
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
B. Ardiansyahmiraja
Indonesia
Bobby Ardiansyahmiraja — Master of Technology Management, Lecturer, Faculty of Business and Economics
Surabaya, Indonesia
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
1. Schwab C. Charles Schwab survey: Generation investor. Westlake, TX: Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.; 2020. 23 p. URL: https://content.schwab.com/web/retail/public/about-schwab/charles_schwab_gen_investor_survey_findings_0421–17NM.pdf
2. Chiah M., Zhong A. Trading from home: The impact of COVID-19 on trading volume around the world. Finance Research Letters. 2020;37:101784. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101784
3. Bertone F., Vassio L., Trevisan M. The stock exchange of influencers: A financial approach for studying fanbase variation trends. In: Proc. 2021 IEEE/ACM Int. conf. on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM’21). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery; 2021:431–435. DOI: 10.1145/3487351.3488413
4. Baroi R. N. Digital brand communication transformation in the stock brokerage industry. Dhaka: Brac University; 2022. 30 p. URL: https://dspace.bracu.ac.bd/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10361/18047/18304037_BBA.pdf?sequence=1
5. Lad H., Vajpayee A., Sanghani P. Customer-centric stock broking in Industry 5.0. In: Abouhawwash M., Rosak-Szyrocka J., Gupta S. K., eds. Aspects of quality management in value creating in the Industry 5.0 way. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2024:46–59. DOI: 10.1201/9781032677040–3
6. Shaikh A. A., Alamoudi H., Alharthi M., Glavee-Geo R. Advances in mobile financial services: A review of the literature and future research directions. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2022;41(1):1–33. DOI: 10.1108/IJBM-06–2021–0230
7. Tai Y.-M., Ku Y.-C. Will stock investors use mobile stock trading? A benefit-risk assessment based on a modified UTAUT model. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 2013;14(1):67–84. URL: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=3594a5f986e0d3087d5b45bb7ef6f78602fef2ae
8. Tan G. K.S. Democratizing finance with Robinhood: Financial infrastructure, interface design and platform capitalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2021;53(8):1862–1878. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X211042378
9. Chong L.-L., Ong H.-B., Tan S.-H. Acceptability of mobile stock trading application: A study of young investors in Malaysia. Technology in Society. 2021;64:101497. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101497
10. Khan I., Hollebeek L. D., Fatma M., et al. Mobile app vs. desktop browser platforms: The relationships among customer engagement, experience, relationship quality and loyalty intention. Journal of Marketing Management. 2023;39(3–4):275–297. DOI: 10.1080/0267257X.2022.2106290
11. Musa H. G., Fatmawati I., Nuryakin N., Suyanto M. Marketing research trends using technology acceptance model (TAM): A comprehensive review of researches (2002–2022). Cogent Business & Management. 2024;11(1):2329375. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2329375
12. Sari N. P.W.P., Duong M.-P.T., Li D., Nguyen M.-H., Vuong Q.-H. Rethinking the effects of performance expectancy and effort expectancy on new technology adoption: Evidence from Moroccan nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2024;19(3):557–565. DOI: 10.1016/j.teln.2024.04.002
13. Jumaa M. How effective is the banking and financial services sector in the United Arab Emirates in using technological innovations. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2023;27(3):139–153. DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671–2023–27–3–139–153
14. Li F., Lu H., Hou M., Cui K., Darbandi M. Customer satisfaction with bank services: The role of cloud services, security, e-learning and service quality. Technology in Society. 2021;64:101487. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101487
15. Featherman M., Jia S. J., Califf C. B., Hajli N. The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021;169:120847. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120847
16. Wójcik D., Ioannou S. COVID‐19 and finance: Market developments so far and potential impacts on the financial sector and centres. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie. 2020;111(3):387–400. DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12434
17. Nguyen Y. T.H., Tapanainen T., Nguyen H. T.T. Reputation and its consequences in Fintech services: The case of mobile banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2022;40(7):1364–1397. DOI: 10.1108/IJBM-08–2021–0371
18. de Oliveira Santini F., Eberle L., Ladeira W. J., et al. Trust in the financial services context: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2023;41(7):1693–1714. DOI: 10.1108/IJBM-06–2022–0248
19. Zhang L., Pentina I., Fan Y. Who do you choose? Comparing perceptions of human vs robo-advisor in the context of financial services. Journal of Services Marketing. 2021;35(5):634–646. DOI: 10.1108/JSM-05–2020–0162
20. Casado-Molina A.-M., Rojas-de-Gracia M.-M., Alarcón-Urbistondo P., Ramos C. M.Q. Banking reputation and its impact on stock markets: A big data analysis through online comments. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2025;43(5):979–998. DOI: 10.1108/IJBM-07–2024–0419
21. Malhotra S. Study of features of mobile trading apps: A silver lining of pandemic. Journal of Global Information & Business Strategy (JGIBS). 2020;12(1):75–80. DOI: 10.5958/2582–6115.2020.00009.0
22. Hwang Y. M., Lee K. C. An eye-tracking paradigm to explore the effect of online consumers’ emotion on their visual behaviour between desktop screen and mobile screen. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2022;41(3):535–546. DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1813330
23. Nair P. S., Shiva A., Yadav N., Tandon P. Determinants of mobile apps adoption by retail investors for online trading in emerging financial markets. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2023;30(5):1623–1648. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-01–2022–0019
24. Al-Okaily M., Alghazzawi R. Alkhwaldi A. F., Al-Okaily A. The effect of digital accounting systems on the decision-making quality in the banking industry sector: A mediated-moderated model. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. 2023;72(8–9):882–901. DOI: 10.1108/GKMC-01–2022–0015
25. Yadulla A. R., Nadella G. S., Maturi M. H., Gonaygunta H. Evaluating behavioral intention and fi nancial stability in cryptocurrency exchange app: Analyzing system quality, perceived trust, and digital currency. Journal of Digital Market and Digital Currency. 2024;1(2):103–124. DOI: 10.47738/jdmdc.v1i2.12
26. Kang H. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 2021;18:17. DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17
27. Sadya S. Data Jumlah Investor Pasar Modal di Indonesia hingga Oktober 2023. DataIndonesia.Id. 2023. URL: https://dataindonesia.id/pasar-saham/detail/data-jumlah-investor-pasar-modal-di-indonesia-hingga-oktober-2023 (accessed on 11.02.2024).
28. Hair J., Hult G. T.M., Ringle C., Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 3 rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2022. 384 p.
29. Roongruangsee R., Patterson P. Engaging robo-advisors in fi nancial advisory services: The role of psychological comfort and client psychological characteristics. Australasian Marketing Journal. 2023;32(4):339–354. DOI: 10.1177/14413582231195990
30. Van Zeeland I., Pierson J. In banks we trust: Banks as custodians of personal data in open banking ecosystems. In: TPRC 49: The 49 th Res. conf. on communication, information and Internet policy. Washington, DC: Washington College of Law, American University; 2021.
Review
For citations:
Yohanes M., Ardiansyahmiraja B. Factors Affecting Investor Adoption of Online Stockbrokers. Finance: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2026-30-5-2100-02