The Impact of ESG Social Aspects Disclosure on the Stock Prices of Chinese Companies
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-6-18-31
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of social disclosure in non-financial corporate reporting on company stock prices in the periods before and after the coronavirus pandemic.
The study methodology includes panel regression, text analysis, and quantitative analysis of social content indicators in companies’ annual reports. Machine learning and LDA were used to generate key word «topics». These were selected based on research into Russian investor characteristics and mentality: these were the primary factors investors pay attention to when examining a company’s social policy. Results: The study revealed that social factors assumed a more significant role in shaping investment attractiveness in 2021–2022. Assessing indicators for two periods, referred to as «pre-COVID» and «post-COVID», demonstrated an increase in the number of significant social factors influencing company stock prices. Thus, in 2018–2019, we identified only three significant indicators, but in 2020–2021, we identified nine significant social variables, thereby confirming Hypothesis 3. Social policy indicators were found to have both a direct relationship (working conditions, average number of hours of training) and an inverse relationship (average salary, injury rate, social investment).
Conclusions: the theoretical contribution of signaling theory is confirmed, as it is signals related to social policy that influence investors and their decisions.
Keywords
JEL: G32
About the Authors
E. A. FedorovaRussian Federation
Elena A. Fedorova – Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Department of Corporate Finance and Corporate Management
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
M. A. Fedotova
Russian Federation
Marina A. Fedotova – Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Department of Corporate Finance and Corporate Management
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
I. S. Demin
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Slepneva – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Department of Corporate Finance and Corporate
Management
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
T. A. Slepneva
Russian Federation
Igor S. Demin – Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Department of Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Information Technology and Big Data Analysis
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
1. Borges M. L., Anholon R., Cooper Ordo˜nez R.E., et al. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices developed by Brazilian companies: An exploratory study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology. 2018;25(6):509–517. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2017.1416700
2. Di Giuli A., Kostovetsky L. Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics. 2014;111(1):158–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.002
3. Campbell L., Gulas C. S., Gruca T. S. Corporate giving behavior and decision-maker social consciousness. Journal of Business Ethics. 1999;19(4):375–383. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006080417909
4. Godfrey P. C., Merrill C. B., Hansen J. M. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal. 2009;30(4):425–445. DOI: 10.1002/smj.750
5. Cazeri G. T., Anholon R., da Silva D., et al. An assessment of the integration between corporate social responsibility practices and management systems in Brazil aiming at sustainability in enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;182:746–754. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.023
6. Carvalho S. W., Sen S., de Oliveira Mota M., de Lima R. C. Consumer reactions to CSR: A Brazilian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. 2010;91(S 2):291–310. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–010–0620–0
7. Hanaysha J. R. Customer retention and the mediating role of perceived value in retail industry. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development. 2018;14(1):2–24. DOI: 10.1108/WJEMSD-06–2017–0035
8. Bhattacharya S. Imperfect information, dividend policy, and “the bird in the hand” fallacy. The Bell Journal of Economics. 1979;10(1):259–270. DOI: 10.2307/3003330
9. Jensen M. C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review. 1986;76(2):323–329.
10. Stolbov M. I., Shchepeleva M. A. The impact of ESG factors on financial stability. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2022;(11):136–148. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2022–11–136–148
11. Kanno M. Does ESG performance improve firm creditworthiness? Finance Research Letters. 2023;55(PtA):103894. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.103894
12. Sassen R., Hinze A.-K., Hardeck I. Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics. 2016;86(8):867–904. DOI: 10.1007/s11573–016–0819–3
13. Qian K., Shi B., Song Y., Wu H. ESG performance and loan contracting in an emerging market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2023;78:101973. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101973
14. Li W., Cui J., Gao J., Xiong J. Corporate social responsibility in China’s airline industry: A longitudinal content analysis of related reports. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2023;111:102420. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2023.102420
15. He F., Ding C., Yue W., Liu G. ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2023;87:102550. DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102550
16. Bang J., Ryu D., Yu J. ESG controversies and investor trading behavior in the Korean market. Finance Research Letters. 2023;54:103750. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.103750
17. Albuquerque R., Koskinen Y., Yang S., Zhang C. Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: An analysis of the exogenous COVID-19 market crash. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies. 2020;9(3):593–621. DOI: 10.1093/rcfs/cfaa011
18. Gusheva E., de Gooyert V. Can we have our cake and eat it? A review of the debate on green recovery from the COVID-19 crisis. Sustainability. 2021;13(2):874. DOI: 10.3390/su13020874
19. Broadstock D. C., Chan K., Cheng L. T.W., Wang X. The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters. 2021;38:101716. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
20. Ding W., Levine R., Lin C., Xie W. Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics. 2021;141(2):802–830. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.005
21. He F., Feng Y., Hao J. Corporate ESG rating and stock market liquidity: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling. 2023;129:106511. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106511
22. Lewis C., Young S. Fad or future? Automated analysis of financial text and its implications for corporate reporting. Accounting and Business Research. 2019;49(5):587–615. DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2019.1611730
23. Blei D. M., Ng A. Y., Jordan M. I. Latent dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2003;3:993–1022. URL: https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume3/blei03a/blei03a.pdf
24. Moro S., Cortez P., Rita P. Business intelligence in banking: A literature analysis from 2002 to 2013 using text mining and latent Dirichlet allocation. Expert Systems with Applications. 2015;42(3):1314–1324. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.024
25. Efimova O. V., Volkov M. A., Koroleva D. A. The impact of ESG factors on asset returns: Empirical research. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2021;25(4):82–97. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-4-82-97
26. Belik I. S., Dutsinin A. S., Nikulina N. L. The managerial aspect of accounting ESG factors in assessing the value of a company. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2023;27(6):161–172. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-6-161-172
Review
For citations:
Fedorova E.A., Fedotova M.A., Demin I.S., Slepneva T.A. The Impact of ESG Social Aspects Disclosure on the Stock Prices of Chinese Companies. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(6):18-31. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-6-18-31


































