Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

THE CONCEPT OF JOINT VALUE CREATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF THE BUSINESS MODEL: PECULIAR PROPERTIES OF COMPANIES DIFFERENT IN THE TYPE OF PRODUCTION AND ECONOMIC INTERACTION

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2018-22-2-160-170

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of transformation of business models of companies, which has become relevant for many of them in connection with the development of information technology and the emergence of real opportunities to include final consumers in the value chain. The features of this process for different types of companies are studied. The author analyzed 65 academic articles examining transformations of business models of particular companies. The analyzed companies were classified by two features: the type of economic interaction and the type of production. This makes possible to divide them into four groups. The author analyzes the problems, goals, and objectives of research for each of the four types of companies, as well as the scientific theories on which their authors rely.

The purpose of the article is to identify the particularities of different types of companies, which are faced with the task of transforming business models, what, in turn, would allow companies to involve in the value chain of new members, more effectively create, deliver and withdraw value, as well as redistribute it among the rest of the participants.

Content analysis is used to analyze academic articles published between 2010 and 2017, which are available in the databases of scientific citation Scopus and Web of Science. As a theoretical basis, we used service-dominant logic, Chesbrough and Rosenbloom’s concept of open innovation, Zott and Amit’s concept of action system and a number of others.

The article concludes that Vargo and Lusch’s concept of service-dominant logic is the fundamental theoretical basis for most studies on business models and the theory of joint value creation. At the same time, depending on the type of company and the sector of the economy in which company acts, the practical problems faced by the company also vary, as well as the possible options for their solution. It is concluded that improving the business model of the organization, the researcher needs to take into account the business environment and the specifics of the sector.

About the Author

E. V. Migol
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Russian Federation

Ekaterina V. Migol’ — PhD, 3nd year Faculty of business and management, Strategic Marketing 

Moscow



References

1. Prahalad C., Ramaswamy V. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2004;18(3):5–14. DOI: 10.1002/dir.20015

2. Storbacka K., Frow P., Nenonen S., Payne A. Designing business models for value co-creation. In Special Issue — Toward a Better Understanding of the Role of Value in Markets and Marketing. 2015;9:51–78.

3. Payne A., Storbacka K., Frow P. Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2008;36(1):83–96.

4. Vargo S., Maglio P., Akaka M. On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal. 2008;26(3):145–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2008.04.003

5. Zott C., Amit R. Business Model Design: An Activity System Perspective. Long Range Planning. 2010;43(2– 3):216–226. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004

6. Klimanov D.E., Tret’yak O.A. Business-models: the main directions of research and the search for a meaningful foundation of the concept. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta. 2014;12(3):107–130. (In Russ.).

7. Vargo S., Vargo S. On A Theory of Markets and Marketing: From Positively Normative to Normatively Positive. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ). 2007;15(1):53–60. DOI: 10.1016/s1441–3582(07)70029–0

8. Galvagno M., Dalli D. Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal. 2014;24(6):643–683. DOI: 10.1108/msq-09–2013–0187

9. Gentile C., Spiller N., Noci G. How to Sustain the Customer Experience: An Overview of Experience Components that Co-Create Value with the Customer. European Management Journal. 2007;25(5):395–410. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2007.08.005

10. Sawhney M., Verona G., Prandelli E. Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2005;19(4):4–17. DOI: 10.1002/dir.20046

11. Bitner M., Ostrom A., Morgan F. Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation. California Management Review. 2008;50(3):66–94. DOI: 10.2307/41166446

12. Vargo S., Lusch R. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing. 2004;68(1):1–17. DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

13. Vargo S., Lusch R. Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2008;36(1):1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s11747–007–0069–6

14. Zott C., Amit R. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal. 2001;22(6/7):493–520.

15. Chesbrough H., Rosenbloom R. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2002;11(3):529–555. DOI: 10.1093/icc/11.3.529

16. Storbacka K., Nenonen S. Markets as configurations. European Journal of Marketing. 2011;45(1/2):241–258. DOI: 10.1108/03090561111095685

17. Teece D. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning. 2010;43(2–3):172–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003

18. Chesbrough H. Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy and Leadership. 2007;35(6):12–17. DOI: 10.1108/10878570710833714

19. Mortara L., Minshall T. How do large multinational companies implement open innovation? Technovation. 2011;31:586–597. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.05.002

20. Duriau V., Reger R., Pfarrer M. A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements. Organizational Research Methods. 2007;10(1):5–34. DOI: 10.1177/1094428106289252

21. Short J., Palmer T. The Application of DICTION to Content Analysis Research in Strategic Management. Organizational Research Methods. 2008;11(4):727–752. DOI: 10.1177/1094428107304534

22. Gaura A., Kumar M. A Systematic approach to conducting review studies: An assessment of content analysis in 25 years of IB research. Journal of World Business. 2018;53:280–289. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2017.11.003

23. Kindstrom D. Towards a service-based business model — Key aspects for future competitive advantage. European Management Journal. 2010;28:479–490. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2010.07.002

24. Smith L., Maull R. Servitization and operations management: a service dominant-logic approach. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2014;34(2):242–269. DOI: 10.1108/ijopm-02–2011–0053

25. Neff A.A., Hamel F., Herz T., Uebernickel F., Brenner W., vom Brocke J. Developing a maturity model for service systems in heavy equipment manufacturing enterprises. Information and Management. 2014;51(7):895–911. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2014.05.001

26. Janeschek S., Hottum P., Kicherer F., Bienzeisler B. The dynamics of service productivity and value creation: A service life cycle perspective. Service Industries Journal. 2013;33(3–4):366–377. DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2013.747518

27. Sarker S., Sahaym A., Bjørn-Andersen N. Exploring value co-creation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: A revelatory case study. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems. 2012;36(1):317–338.

28. Eaton B., Elaluf-Calderwood S., Sørensen C., Yoo Y. Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems. 2015;39(1):217–243. DOI: 10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.10

29. Westh N. H., Scupola A. Investigating issues and challenges for customer involvement in business services innovation. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing. 2011;26(5):368–376. DOI: 10.1108/08858621111144424

30. Hakanen T. Co-creating integrated solutions within business networks: The KAM team as knowledge integrator. Industrial Marketing Management. 2014;43(7):1195–1203. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.08.002

31. Öberg C., Shih T. T.Y. Divergent and convergent logic of firms: Barriers and enablers for development and commercialization of innovations. Industrial Marketing Management. 2014;43(3):419–428. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.010

32. Garcia M.M., Walton B. The wisdom of crowds: The potential of online communities as a tool for data analysis. Technovation. 2014;34(4):203–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.010

33. Schneider S., Spieth P., Clauss T. Business model innovation in the aviation industry. International Journal of Product Development. 2013;18(3–4):286–310. DOI: 10.1504/ijpd.2013.055010

34. Neuhofer B., Buhalis D., Ladkin A. Smart technologies for personalized experiences: a case study in the hospitality domain. Electronic Markets. 2015;25(3):243–254. DOI: 10.1007/s12525–015–0182–1


Review

For citations:


Migol E.V. THE CONCEPT OF JOINT VALUE CREATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF THE BUSINESS MODEL: PECULIAR PROPERTIES OF COMPANIES DIFFERENT IN THE TYPE OF PRODUCTION AND ECONOMIC INTERACTION. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2018;22(2):160-170. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2018-22-2-160-170

Views: 1077


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)