Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

NATIONAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MODEL: THE IMPERATIVES OF FUNDING THE GROWTH OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2018-22-3-36-51

Abstract

The article discusses the role, importance, potential and problems of corporate organization of industry in Russia. We established that the implementation of a developed model of corporate governance is a reliable and effective system of funding the growth of enterprises. The authors reviewed corporate governance in economically developed countries, which are the main drivers of global economic development. On the basis of a broad analysis of theoretical studies and practice of large foreign and Russian corporations, we attempt to show that the assumption about the effectiveness of reforms in the Russian Federation on the basis of privatization of state property and due to this increase in funding of development processes has not remained a proven hypothesis. The reason for this is the reformers’ ignorance of the theoretical principles and international practical experience in the evolution of corporate governance. The methodical basis of this article is economic-statistical, system, and comparative research methods. The authors analyzed and compared large foreign and Russian corporations by industry, the position of the state in management, the number of shareholders, the volume and mechanisms of funding of innovations. We have also summarized the main ratings of large corporations by revenue and capitalization, financing for research and development. The authors identified trends in the gap between Russia according to the factors of the economically developed countries-leaders. The authors concluded that the impact of national corporate governance on the economic development of countries is complex and ambiguous. High productivity, advanced technologies and innovations allow economically developed countries to extract Schumpeterian rent, to obtain additional sources of R&D funding, providing themselves with competitive advantages. Based on a comprehensive analysis of statistical data, the authors recommend that the relevant executive and legislative authorities of the Russian Federation do not delay the entry into a new phase of development of the Russian economy, which can prevent systemic and insurmountable obstacles in the foreseeable future. We propose to strengthen the organization of corporate governance with legislation, state regulation and business practices.

About the Authors

I. S. Mezhov
I.I. Polzunov Altai state technical university
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Econ), Professor; Head of the Department of Economics and Production Management,

Barnaul



O. B. Dronova
I.I. Polzunov Altai state technical university
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Econ), Associate Professor; Department of Economics and Production Management,

Barnaul



References

1. Aganbegyan A. On the eve of structural reforms and socio-economic growth: where to go? (reflections on the book “The new integral society”). EKO. 2017;(1):72–93. (In Russ.).

2. Raynert E. Forgotten lessons from past successes. Ekspert. 2009;(1). URL: http://expert.ru/expert/2010/01/ zabutue_uroki_proshluh_uspehov/ (accessed 17.05.2018). (In Russ.).

3. Stiglitz J. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Corporate governance failures in the transition. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2001;(4):108–146. (In Russ.).

4. Dosi G. Economic coordination and dynamics: some elements of an alternative “evolutionary” paradigm. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2012;(12):31–60. (In Russ.).

5. Dosi G., Orsenigo L. Coordination and transformation: An overview of structures, behaviours and change in evolutionary environments. In: Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter Publ.; N.Y.: Columbia University Press; 1988:13–37.

6. Stiglitz J. E. Rethinking Macroeconomics: What Failed, and How to Repair It. Journal of the European Economic Association. 2011;(4):591–645.

7. Mezhov I. S., Mezhov S. I. Methodology to investigate innovation process in a corporation. Vestnik Altaiskoi akademii ekonomiki i prava = Journal of Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2015;(1):25–34. (In Russ.).

8. Hurst D.K. China’s strategic challenge. Strategy+Business. 2014;(75). URL: https://www.strategy-business. com/article/14202b (accessed 17.05.2018).

9. Gross D. Not so great expectations for Japan. Strategy+Business. 2016. URL: https://www.strategy-business. com/blog/Not-So-Great-Expectations (accessed 17.05.2018).

10. Polterovich V. M. On the strategy of catching-up development for Russia. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2007;(3):17–23. (In Russ.).

11. Glaz’ev S. Yu. On the tasks of structural policy in conditions of global technological shifts. Part 1. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2007;(3):49–61. (In Russ.).

12. Kudrov V. M. The economy of Russia: Essence and visibility. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2009;(2):39–48. (In Russ.).

13. Ludwig H., Spiegel E. America’s real manufacturing advantage. Strategy+Business. 2014;(74). URL: https://www.strategy-business.com/article/00240 (accessed 17.05.2018).

14. Jaruzelski B., Staack V., Chwalik R. Will stronger borders weaken innovation? Strategy+Business. 2017;(89). URL: https://www.strategy-business.com/feature/Will-Stronger-Borders-Weaken-Innovation (accessed 17.05.2018).

15. Becker G.S. The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1976. 320 p.

16. Kondrat’ev V.B. Corporate governance and investment process. Moscow: Nauka; 2003. 318 p. (In Russ.).

17. Kelly C., Sheppard B. Common purpose: Realigning business, economies, and society. Strategy+Business. 2018;(88). URL: https://www.strategy-business.com/feature/Common-Purpose-Realigning-BusinessEconomies-and-Society (дата обращения: 17.05.2018).

18. Bazhutin I.A., Bazhutina M.M. Postindustrial model of Russia’s development. Upravlencheskie nauki = Management Science. 2017;7(2):15–23. (In Russ.).

19. Krasil’nikov V. Deindustrialization, reindustrialization and development. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2016;60(8):34–43. DOI: 10.20542/0131–2227–2016–60–8–34–43

20. Ivanter V.V., Porfir’ev B.N., Shirov A.A., Shokin I.N. Fundamentals of structural and investment policy in modern Russian conditions. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2017;21(1):6–15.


Review

For citations:


Mezhov I.S., Dronova O.B. NATIONAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MODEL: THE IMPERATIVES OF FUNDING THE GROWTH OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2018;22(3):36-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2018-22-3-36-51

Views: 1129


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)