QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE VALUE OF HUMAN LIFE IN RUSSIA AND IN THE WORLD

The authors of the article present modern approaches to the assessment of the value of human life abroad and in contemporary Russia, which can be used to determine the fair amount of compensation payments to victims in emergency situations of various natures. To this end, a wide range of initial data was used: the results of Russian and international sociological surveys, statistics of Rosstat, the World Bank, and other international databases. The analysis of the legislation carried out by the authors showed that the value of human life in Russia fixed in the normative acts is from 0.5 to 9.2 million roubles. The authors obtained estimates of material losses for the national economy due to the premature death of the average person as a result of emergency situations and for the individual household — they amount to 31.7 and 7.9–10.5 million roubles respectively (in 2017 prices). The authors also provided estimates of the value of the life of the average person in Russia, obtained on the basis of sociological surveys conducted in 2017. The average value of human life in Russia, obtained by methods of sociology, is 5.2 million roubles; the median value is 1.4 million roubles. The article presents the author’s method of assessing the value of human life, taking into account the material and moral damage caused to the family of the deceased, built on the balance of average life expectancy, per capita final consumption, and satisfaction of the population of different countries with their lives. As an equivalent of people’s satisfaction with their lives, the authors also used data on the level of domestic violence in society and the balance of migration flows, both at the national and regional levels. Within the framework of this method, the value of the life of the average person is the average increase in the level of individual consumption, necessary to restore a normal level of satisfaction with their lives in conditions of increased mortality and reduction of the average life expectancy. The article presents also the author’s calculations performed by this method for different groups of countries. It is shown that the total value of human life in the world as a whole is 4.6–4.7 million uS dollars in 2011 prices. In the group of countries with per capita consumption of more than 10 thousand uS dollars the value of human life reaches 18.5 million dollars per year. In the group of countries with incomes below this mark, the value of human life reaches 0.5–1.9 million dollars. According to the authors, in Russia, the “value” of human life should be 51–61 million roubles in the prices of 2017 (about 1 million uS dollars depending on the official exchange rate). The results of the study of the quantitative assessment of the value of human life in Russia are correlated with the conclusions about the social need for just compensation of the damage suffered by the families of the victims of natural, man-made and other emergencies.

the value of human life, emergency situations, human capital, products of insurance companies, complex assessment of damage from emergency, risk of death, life expectancy at birth

1. Aganbegyan A. Achieving the highest level of life expectancy in Russia. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy. 2012;(2):134–156. (In Russ.).

2. Bowland B.J., Beghin J. C. Robust estimates of value of a statistical life for developing economies: An application to pollution and mortality in Santiago. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development. Iowa State University. Working Paper. 1998;(214). URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/ pdf/99wp214.pdf (accessed 19.07.2018).

3. Aganbegyan A. How much does a person’s life in Russia cost? Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy. 2014;(1):54–66. (In Russ.).

4. Ashenfelter O. Measuring the value of a statistical life: Problems and prospects. The Economic Journal. 2006;116(510): C 10-C 23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–0297.2006.01072.x

5. Majumder A., Madheswaran S. Value of statistical life: A meta-analysis with mixed effects regression model. The Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore. Working Paper. 2016;(362). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3095.1928 URL: http://www.isec.ac.in/WP%20362%20-%20Agamoni%20 Majumder%20-%20Final.pdf (accessed 19.07.2018).

6. Viscusi W. K. The value of life. The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper. 2005;(517). URL: http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/papers/pdf/Viscusi_517.pdf (accessed 19.07.2018).

7. Viscusi W.K., Aldy J. E. The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world. NBER Working Paper. 2003;(9487). URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w9487.pdf (accessed 19.07.2018).

8. Guriev S. Myths of the economy. Misconceptions and stereotypes that are spread by the media and politicians. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2017. 320 p. (In Russ.).

9. Karabchuk T., Nikitina M., Remezkova V., Soboleva N. How to evaluate the value of human life? Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya = Economic Sociology. 2014;15(1):89–106. (In Russ.).

10. Latova N. Russians’ satisfaction with life during the crisis: 2015 — the year of bifurcation. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny = The Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2016;(3):15–36. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2016.3.02 (In Russ.).

11. Trunov I.L., Aivar L. K., Kharisov G. Kh. Equivalent value of human life. Predstavitel’naya vlast’ — XXI vek: zakonodatel’stvo, kommentarii, problemy = Representative Power — 21st Century: Legislation, Commentary, Problems. 2006;(3):24–29. URL: http://www.pvlast.ru/img/pdf2006–3/8.pdf (accessed 19.07.2018). (In Russ.).

12. Wang H., He J. The value of statistical life: A contingent investigation in China. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2010;(5421). URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/ 10986/3905/WPS 5421.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed 19.07.2018).

13. Tooth R. The cost of road crashes: A review of key issues. Kingston: Australasian Railway Association; 2010. 34 p. URL: http://www.econ.mq.edu.au/Econ_docs/research_seminars/ 2011_research_seminars/ Tooth_Accidents_180311.pdf (accessed 19.07.2018).

14. Peden M., Scurfield R., Sleet D. et al., eds. World report on road traffic injury prevention. Ge- neva: World Health Organization; 2004. 244 p. URL: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/han- dle/10665/42871/9241562609.pdf;jsessionid=E 574BADBED 918022DC 2416ED 90C 2C 923?sequence=1 (accessed 19.07.2018).

15. Mackenbach J. P. Convergence and divergence of life expectancy in Europe: A centennial view. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2013;28(3):229–240. DOI: 10.1007/s10654–012–9747-x

16. Kuklin A.A., Shipitsyna S.E., Nifantova R.V. Economic evaluation of human life. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics, Ural Division of RAS; 2012. 43 р. (In Russ.).

17. Denisenko M., Varshavskaya E. Duration of working life in Russia. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = The HSE Economic Journal. 2017;21(4):592–622. (In Russ.).

18. Loichinger E., Weber D. Trends in working life expectancy in Europe. Journal of Aging and Health. 2016;28(7):1194–1213. DOI: 10.1177/0898264316656509.

19. Kadefors R., Nilsson K., Rylander L., Östergren P.-O., Albin M. Occupation, gender and work-life exits: A Swedish population study. Ageing & Society. 2018;38(7):1332–1349. DOI: 10.1017/S 0144686X17000083

20. Dudel С., Myrskylä M. Recent trends in US working life expectancy at age 50 by gender, education, and race/ethnicity and the impact of the Great Recession. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. MPIDR Working Paper. 2016;(006). URL: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/papers/working/wp-2016–006.pdf (accessed 19.07.2018).

21. Leinonen T., Martikainen P., Myrskylä M. Working life and retirement expectancies at age 50 by social class: Period and cohort trends and projections for Finland. Journals of Gerontology: Series B. Psychologi- cal Sciences and Social Sciences. 2018;73(2):302–313. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbv104