5 financial System: an Integrated approach in the Context of the State financial Policy
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2018-22-5-56-75
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to substantiate theoretically and applied integrated approaches to the functioning and development of the fnancial system in the context of the state fnancial policy under the international sanctions. The study has been based on the theory of fnance, the dialectical method, and scientifc argumentation. We used a systemic approach, historical and economic-statistical methods as well. The authors substantiate the important scientifc direction of the modern fnancial system — modernization and progressive development and determine the consolidating functions of the state fnancial regulation, aimed at eliminating the imbalance, including new approaches to fnancing the budget defcit at the expense of borrowed funds. New approaches to macroeconomic orientation form new opportunities for modern modifcations in the fnancial system. On the basis of scientific arguments, the authors showed that although the federal budget of Russia plays a key role in the development of the fnancial system and the fnancial market, and the state fnancial policy acts as a macroeconomic regulator, the fnancial system of Russia develops on the basis of its own laws arising within it. The authors substantiate the point of view that the state fnancial policy is aimed at revealing the diversity of the functions of money circulation. This has an impact not only on social reproduction but also on the functioning and development of the fnancial system as a whole. The public fnancial policy should take into account the peculiarities of the functioning and development of the fnancial system in the context of constantly occurring macro-, meso-, and microeconomic processes. Of course, this will allow applying new approaches to modern changes in the fnancial system, and will also indicate the existence of a communicative convergent market, which is a sign of the formation of a “market of symbolic exchange of signs”, and hence of the new monetary changes.
About the Authors
Yu. N. Vorob’evRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Head of the Department of Enterprise Finance and Insurance of the Institute of Economics and Management
L. M. Borshch
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Head of the Department of Enterprise Finance
and Insurance of the Institute of Economics and Management
References
1. Minsky H.Р. The Financial Instability Hypothesis. The Levy Economics Institute. Working Paper. 1992;(74).
2. Rajan R., Zingales L. The great reversals: the politics of fnancial development in the 20th centry. Journal of Financian Ecjnjmics, Elsevier. 2003;69(1):5–50.
3. Stiglitz J. Monopoly, NonLinear Pricing, and Imperefect Information: The Insurance Market. Review of Economic Studies. 1997;44(3):407.
4. Vorobyova E. I. Enhancing the role of public fnance in the fnancial system of the Russian Federation. Nauchnyi vestnik: fnansy, banki, investitsii = Scientifc Bulletin: fnance, banking, investment. 2016;(1):21–26. (In Russ.).
5. Lavrov V.N., Ponomareva S.I. Monetary policy in the context of theoretical and methodological problems of economic science. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Journal of the Ural University of Economics, 2018;19(1):5–15. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2073–1019–2018–19–1–1
6. Poltoradneva N. L., Zav’yalova D.A. Modern interpretation of the fnancial system category. Finance and credit. 2018;4(3):537–549. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/fc.24.3.537
7. Borsh L.M. Development of the fnancial system of the Russian Federation in the context of integration of the economy. Nauchnyi vestnik: fnansy, banki, investitsii = Scientifc Bulletin: fnance, banking, investment. 2016;(1):5–11. (In Russ.).
8. Vorobyov Yu. N. Formation of fnancial resources by jointstock companies. Simferopol’: Antikva Publ.; 2017. 277 p. (In Russ.).
9. Vaganov V. D. Comparative characteristics of fnancial systems of modern Russia and other developed countries with a similar management system. Moscow: Laboratoriya Knigi Publ.; 2012. 174 p. (In Russ.).
10. Ponomareva S. I. Political analysis of the financial nature of capitalism at the beginning of the 21st century. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Journal of the Ural University of Economics. 2013;(3–4):22–28. (In Russ.).
11. Yasin E. Social results of the transformation, or twenty years later. Voprosy ekonomiki = Economic Issues. 2011;(8):77–96. (In Russ.).
12. Aganbegyan A.G. How the state budget can become the locomotive of social and economic development of the country. Voprosy ekonomiki = Economic Issues. 2015;(7):142–151. (In Russ.).
13. Aganbegyan A.G., Ershov M.V. On the relationship between monetary and industrial policy in the banking system of Russia. Den’gi i kredit = Money and Credit. 2013;(6):3–11. (In Russ.).
14. Glazyev S. Yu., Arkhipova V. V. Sanctions and Other Crisis Factor Impact Assessment on the Russian Economy’s State. Russian Economic Journal. 2018;(1):3–39. (In Russ.).
15. Glazyev S. Yu. On inflation targeting. Voprosy ekonomiki = Economic Issues. 2015;(9):124–135. (In Russ.).
16. Dubinin S. K. Financialization of Economic Growth and the Russian National Financial System. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2017;21(4):6–21. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671–2017–21–4–6–21
17. Burkaltseva D., Vorobyov Yu., Borsh L., Gerasimova S., Chepurko V. Structural modelling the system of ensuring the economic security of the complex territorial socioeconomic system of the EurAsEC. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research. 2016;14(9):5683–5704.
Review
For citations:
Vorob’ev Yu.N., Borshch L.M. 5 financial System: an Integrated approach in the Context of the State financial Policy. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2018;22(5):56-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2018-22-5-56-75