Empirical analysis of Dividend Policy of Public and Private Companies in Russia

The ownership structure of large Russian companies is characterized by a high share of state participation, but the relationship of dividend policy with the ownership structure (public or private) is not defned. Statistical analysis of the Russian companies shows that this relationship exists and can be nonlinear. In the course of the regression analysis, the authors tested hypotheses about the existence of a negative relationship between the volume of dividends paid and the share of state participation. We use panel data from nonfnancial companies listed in the Moscow stock exchange from 2008 to 2016, who paid dividends during this period; 150 companies in total. Three specifcations were tested: the frst one uses the dividend payout ratio as a dependent variable; the second — the share of dividends in the free cash flow; the third has a quadratic form — the nonlinear dependence of dividend payout ratio and share of state participation. Control variables were based on life cycle theory. Testing has shown that in the linear form there is no statistically signifcant relationship between the indicators of dividend payouts and the share of state participation. We have shown that the relationship between the dividend payout ratio and the share of government participation is non-linear and has the form of an inverted u-shape parabola. For a low level of state participation the dependence is positive but for a high level of participation, it is negative. This result can be explained in the framework of the agency theory: a positive relationship indicates the use of dividend payouts to resolve the agency conflict; a negative — the concentration of money in the hands of managers due to minority shareholders weakness. Further development of the study may include the addition of institutional constraints to the model, as well as the expansion of the concept of the dividend policy outcome within the framework of the frm’s sustainable development theory.

1. Zal’tsman A.A. Determinants of dividend policy of the Russian public companies. Audit i fnansovyi analiz. 2012;(1):233–241. (In Russ.).

2. Pirogov N.K., Volkova N.N. Dividend policy: Evidence from emerging markets. Korporativnye fnansy = Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2009;3(4):57–78. (In Russ.).

3. Makarov A. S., Ryabova E.V., Khvostova I. E. Problems of improving financial methods and models for sustainable development of the company. Moscow: Infra­M; 2018. 232 р. (In Russ.).

4. Ivashkovskaya I. V., Stepanova A. N. Ownership structure as an element of the corporate financial architecture: the impact on the strategic effectiveness of the company. Finansy i biznes = Finance and Business. 2009;(3):1–22. (In Russ.).

5. Easterbrook F.H. Two agency­cost explanations of dividends. The American Economic Review. 1984;74(4):650–659.

6. Leland H.E., Pyle D.H. Informational asymmetries, fnancial structure, and fnancial intermediation. The Journal of Finance. 1977;32(2):371–387. DOI: 10.2307/2326770

7. Barnhart S.W., Rosenstein S. Board composition, managerial ownership, and frm performance: An empirical analysis. The Financial Review. 1998;33(4):1–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–6288.1998.tb01393.x

8. Truong T., Heaney R. Largest shareholder and dividend policy around the world. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2007;47(5):667–687. DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2007.09.002

9. La Porta R., Lopez­de­Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. The Journal of Finance. 2000;55(1):1–33. DOI: 10.1111/0022–1082.00199

10. Faccio M., Lang L.H.P., Young L. Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review. 2001;91(1):54–78. DOI: 10.1257/aer.91.1.54

11. Bebczuk R.N. Corporate governance and ownership: Measurement and impact on corporate performance and dividend policies in Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Documento de Trabajo. 2005;(59). URL: http://www.depeco.econo.unlp.edu.ar/wp/wp­content/uploads/2017/05/doc59.pdf (accessed 31.08.2018).

12. Maury C. B., Pajuste A. Controlling shareholders, agency problems, and dividend policy in Finland. LTA. 2002;1(2):15–45. URL: http://njb.f/wp­content/uploads/2015/05/lta_2002_01_a1.pdf (accessed 31.08.2018).

13. Farinha J. Dividend policy, corporate governance and the managerial entrenchment hypothesis: an empirical analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 2003;30(9–10):1173–1209. DOI: 10.1111/j.0306–686X.2003.05624.x

14. Khan T. Company dividends and ownership structure: Evidence from UK panel data. The Economic Journal. 2006;116(510): C 172­C 189. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–0297.2006.01082.x

15. Schooley D.K., Barney L.D. Jr. Using dividend policy and managerial ownership to reduce agency costs. The Journal of Financial Research. 1994;17(3):363–373. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475–6803.1994.tb00198.x

16. Farinha J., López­de­Foronda Ó. The relation between dividends and insider ownership in different legal systems: International evidence. The European Journal of Finance. 2009;15(2):169–189. DOI: 10.1080/13518470802588718

17. Alekseeva L.V., Berezinets I.V., Il’ina Yu.B. The influence of ownership structure on the dividend policy of the Russian companies. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 8. Menedzhment = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management Series. 2011;(4):3–31. (In Russ.).

18. Polugodina V.V., Repin D.V. Dividend policy of the Russian companies: Empirical models. Korporativnye fnansy = Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2009;3(3):20–35. (In Russ.).

19. Nizar Al­Malkawi H.­A. Determinants of corporate dividend policy in Jordan: An application of the Tobit model. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. 2007;23(2):44–70. DOI: 10.1108/10264116200700007

20. Al­Kuwari D. Determinants of the dividend policy of companies listed on emerging stock exchanges: the case of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Global Economy & Finance Journal. 2009;2(2):38–63. URL: http://www.gefjpapers.com/static/documents/September/2009/3.%20Duha.pdf (accessed 31.08.2018).

21. Wang X., Manry D., Wandler S. The impact of government ownership on dividend policy in China. Advances in Accounting. 2011;27(2):366–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.adiac.2011.08.003

22. Kouki M., Guizani M. Ownership structure and dividend policy evidence from the Tunisian stock market. European Journal of Scientifc Research. 2009;25(1):42–53.

23. Bradford W., Chen C., Zhu S. Cash dividend policy, corporate pyramids, and ownership structure: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2013;27:445–464. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2013.01.003

24. Ambardnishvili T.G., Berezinets I.V., Il’ina Yu.B., Smirnov M.V. Board of directors and dividend policy in the Russian companies with direct state participation. Korporativnye fnansy = Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2017;11(1):50–77. (In Russ.).

25. Djankov S., Murrell P. Enterprise restructuring in transition: A quantitative survey. Journal of Economic Literature. 2002;40(3):739–792. DOI: 10.1257/002205102760273788

26. Nikolashina N.N. Comparison of the dividend policy of public and private companies by the example of oil and gas companies in Russia. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2013;(26):61–72. (In Russ.).

27. Sibova N.M. Corporate governance as a determinant of the dividend policy of the Russian companies. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2012;(14):60–65. (In Russ.).