Relationship between Oil Price and Macroeconomic Indicators in Russia

One of the most important external factors affecting the exchange rate of the US dollar to the Russian rouble has been the global oil price. Russia, whose economy is mainly associated with oil production, is one of the world’s largest oil suppliers. Therefore, the slightest fluctuations in oil prices can have a significant effect on its economy. The aim of the article is to study the relationship between macroeconomic parameters and oil prices. The objectives of the study are to identify factors having a long-term positive relationship with oil prices based on a mathematical approach, as well as to propose improvements for Russian macroeconomic indicators. The authors use modern mathematical methods of vector autoregression (VAR-model), the Granger method and the Dickey-Fuller test to study the long-term and shortterm relationships between the relevant time series for the period from 2014 to 2016. On this basis, it was calculated that a 1% increase in GDP leads to a strengthening of the national currency by 1.47%. This fact can be explained by the overall growth of the national economy. The Granger test results for the model show that global oil price (and Russian GDP) has the greatest impact on the exchange rate in the short term. The following actions are proposed for improving macroeconomic indicators: stabilisation of foreign economic policy; diversification of exports (although oil revenues can serve as a tool for improving the quality of Russian economic development and public life in general); development of the Russian ‘Urals’ benchmark and increasing its trading volumes on the world market; transition to rubles for settlements of Russian oil and gas; use of a ruble indicator (ruble barrel) of the ‘Urals’ oil price to support the development of Russia’s financial and economic policy.

1. Amano R.A., van Norden S. Exchange rates and oil prices. Review of International Economics. 1998;6(4):683–694. DOI: 10.1111/1467–9396.00136

2. Buetzer S., Habib M., Stracca L. Global exchange rate configurations: Do oil shocks matter? IMF Economic Review. 2016;64(3):443–470. DOI: 10.1057/imfer.2016.9

3. Amano R.A., van Norden S. Oil prices and the rise and fall of the US real exchange rate. Journal of International Money and Finance. 1998;17(2):299–316. DOI: 10.1016/S 0261–5606(98)00004–7

4. Iwayemi A., Fowowe B. Impact of oil price shocks on selected macroeconomic variables in Nigeria. Energy Policy. 2011;39(2):603–612. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.033

5. Ferraro D., Rogoff K., Rossi B. Can oil prices forecast exchange rates? An empirical analysis of the relationship between commodity prices and exchange rates. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2015;54:116–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2015.03.001

6. Akpan E.O. Oil price shocks and Nigeria’s macro economy. A paper presented at the Annual Conference of CSAE: Economic Development in Africa. 2009. URL: http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/conferences/2009-EDIA/Papers/252-Akpan.Pdf

7. Huang Y., Guo F. The role of oil price shocks on China’s real exchange rate. China Economic Review. 2007;18(4):403–416. DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2006.02.003

8. Михайлов А.Ю. Факторы развития экономики России в 2015 году. Journal of Economic Regulation (Вопросы регулирования экономики). 2014;5(4):62–69. Mikhailov A. Yu. Russian economic development factors in 2015. Journal of Economic Regulation. 2014;5(4):62–69. (In Russ.).

9. Wang P., Moore T. Sudden changes in volatility: The case of five central European stock markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2009;19(1):33–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2007.08.006

10. Zhao H. Dynamic relationship between exchange rate and stock price: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance. 2010;24(2):103–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2009.09.001

11. Mikhaylov A. Pricing in oil market and using probit model for analysis of stock market effects. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2018;8(2):69–73.

12. Mikhaylov A. Volatility spillover effect between stock and exchange rate in oil exporting countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2018;8(3):321–326.

13. Johansen S. Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica. 1991;59(6):1551–1580. DOI: 10.2307/2938278

14. Eltony M.N., Al-Awadi M. Oil price fluctuations and their impact on the macroeconomic variables of Kuwait: A case study using a VAR model. International Journal of Energy Research. 2001;25(11):939–959. DOI: 10.1002/er.731

15. Farzanegan M.R., Markwardt G. The effects of oil price shocks on the Iranian economy. Energy Economics. 2009;31(1):134–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.09.003

16. Olomola P.A., Adejumo A.V. Oil price shock and macroeconomic activities in Nigeria. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. 2006;(3):28–34.

17. Singer E. Oil price volatility and the US macroeconomy: 1983–2006. Carleton College Department of Economics. Working papers Series. 2007.

18. Tuzova Ye., Qayum F. Global oil glut and sanctions: The impact on Putin’s Russia. Energy Policy. 2016;90:140–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.008

19. Baumeister C., Peersman G. Time-varying effects of oil supply shocks on the US economy. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2013;5(4):1–28. DOI: 10.1257/mac.5.4.1

20. Backus D.K., Crucini M.J. Oil prices and the terms of trade. Journal of International Economics. 2000;50(1):185–213. DOI: 10.1016/S 0022–1996(98)00064–6

21. Newey W.K., West K.D. Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. The Review of Economic Studies. 1994;61(4):631–653. DOI: 10.2307/2297912

22. Sansó A., Aragó V., Carrion-i-Silvestre J. Testing for changes in the unconditional variance of financial time series. Revista de Economia Financiera. 2004;(4):32–53. URL: http://www.aefin.es/articulos/pdf/A4–2_443809.pdf

23. Walid C., Chaker A., Masood O., Fry J. Stock market volatility and exchange rates in emerging countries: Markovstate switching approach. Emerging Markets Review. 2011;12(3):272–292. DOI:10.1016/j.ememar.2011.04.003.