financial Support of Regions as a tool to Equalize budgetary Security of the Constituent Entities of the Russian federation

The authors have considered current forms and methods of financial support for the regions in Russia. The dynamic analysis allowed to obtain a comprehensive assessment of the interbudgetary transfers provided by the federal budget for the socioeconomic development of the regions in recent years with a view to reducing their economic differentiation and ensuring the implementation of the state regional powers. The methods of economic and statistical analysis were used. The authors conclude that the main form of financial support for the regions of Russia is subsidies to equalize fiscal security. The study proved that the increasing financial assistance in the form of subsidies leads to a decrease of the budgetary support level of the regions. Financial support for the Russian regions in the form of subsidies and subventions has a number of serious shortcomings: the multi-channel financial assistance to the region and the lack of an integrated approach which leads to dispersal and low return on public funds and makes it difficult to control their spending; fragmentation of its provision; reduction of incentives for self-development; difficulty in assessing the amount of assistance needed; refinancing. The identified problems require further implementation of motivation mechanisms for the state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation to increase the tax revenues of the regional budget. The article outlines possible ways to form financial incentives for independent regional development. It is proposed to provide the regions with consolidated subsidies. The regions will be able to independently determine the directions for their spending. This will allow for a balanced transition from the state control over spending the subsidies to the control over the results of their allocation.

region, interbudgetary transfers, budget security, financial support, fiscal federalism, socio-economic development, grants, subsidies, subventions, regional economics

1. Sabitova N. M. Improving the forms and methods of financial support of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2004;(24):2–10. (In Russ.).

2. Vasyunina M. L. Intergovernmental transfers to the constituent entities of the Russian Federation: Current problems and priorities. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience. 2016;(45):17–27. (In Russ.).

3. Fattakhov R. V., Nizamutdinov M. M. Model tools of budget planning and regulation of interbudgetary relations. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2013;(1):36–44. (In Russ.).

4. Stroev P. V., Vlasyuk L. I. The debt burden of regions and regional policy. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2017;21(5):90–99. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671–2017–21–5–90–99

5. Morkovkin D. E., Mamychev A. Y., Yakovenko N. V., Komov I. V., Derevyagina M. V., Didenko O. V. Factors and material conditions for space-intensive economic development of region. International Review of Management and Marketing. 2016;6(S 1):67–72.

6. Kovalenko O. G., Kiryushkina A. N. On the issue of subsidies to equalize the budgetary security of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Karel’skii nauchnyi zhurnal = Karelian Scientific Journal. 2016;5(4):128–131. (In Russ.).

7. Bukhvald E. Russian federalism at the critical stage of development. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2008;(9):70–83 (In Russ.).

8. Nazarov V., Mamedov A., Siluanov A., Zarubin A. Issues of interbudgetary relations in Russia. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ.; 2012. 188 p. (In Russ.).

9. Klimanov V. V., Mikhailova A. A. Interbudgetary relations: Recent trends and prospects. Gosudarstvennyi audit. Pravo. Ekonomika. 2016;(4):31–34. (In Russ.).

10. Bozhechkova A. V., Mamedov A. A., Sinel’nikov-Murylev S.G., Turuntseva M. Yu. Stabilization properties of federal fiscal transfers to Russian regions. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2018;(4):61–83. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31737/2221–2264–2018–40–4–3

11. Bakhtizin A. R., Bukhvald E. M. Economic and legal prerequisites and institutions for reducing the level of interregional differentiation in the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2018;(9):102–112. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_9_10

12. Da Silva M. et al. Intergovernmental reforms in the Russian Federation: One step forward, two steps back? Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2009. 112 p.

13. Yushkov A. O., Oding N. Yu., Savul’kin L. I. The role of subventions in Russian fiscal federalism. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2016;(10):49–64. (In Russ.).

14. Albouy D. Evaluating the efficiency and equity of federal fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economics. 2012;96(9–10):824–839. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.05.015

15. Bird R. M., Smart M. Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: International lessons for developing countries. World Development. 2002;30(6):899–912. DOI: 10.1016/S 0305–750X(02)00016–5

16. Desai R. M., Freinkman L., Goldberg I. Fiscal federalism in rentier regions: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2005;33(4):814–834. DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2005.08.004

17. Bednar J. Subsidiarity and robustness: Building the adaptive efficiency of federal systems. In: Fleming J., Levy J., eds. NOMOS, Vol. 55: Federalism and subsidiarity. New York: NYU Press; 2014:231–256.

18. Thiessen U. Fiscal federalism in Russia: Theory, comparisons, evaluations. Post-Soviet Affairs. 2006;22(3):189–224. DOI: 10.2747/1060–586X.22.3.189

19. Wallack J. S., Srinivasan T. N., eds. Federalism and economic reform: International perspectives. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2006. 528 p.