Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

Central bank Digital Currencies: Key Characteristics and Directions of Influence on Monetary and Credit and Payment Systems

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-4-80-98

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of prospects for digital currency issue by central banks as a new form of central bank money and to the potential of their influence on monetary and credit system. The aim of the article is to interpret and classify central bank digital currencies, to identify key characteristics of digital currencies and possible models of their issue, as well as to define the main directions of influence of digital currencies on the monetary and credit and payment systems. The scientific novelty of the article is in the systematization and comparison of different ideas about the implementation of sovereign digital currencies considering the use of distributed registry technologies. The study analyzed the projects of central banks on the issue of digital currencies and identified their features. Possible directions of influence of central bank digital currencies on the monetary and credit policy of the Central Bank and the activities of credit institutions were determined. It revealed that central bank digital currencies can be considered as a new form of money of the Central Bank, which can be issued to be used both in retail and in wholesale payments. Digital currencies may differ in some characteristics. The key ones are: a way to integrate into the monetary and credit system; emission technology; currency storage method; mechanism of mutual settlements and anonymity level. The study showed that the main incentives for introducing digital currencies are the possibility to provide an alternative and universally accessible legal means of payment, as well as to provide faster, more transparent and cheaper in-country and cross-border payments. The influence of digital currencies on the monetary and credit system and the monetary and credit policy of the Central Bank will largely depend on the scenario of their system integration. If cash is simply replaced in circulation by digital currencies, the effect on the Central Bank monetary and credit system and policy will not be significant. However, if central bank digital currencies are issued as an addition to cash, or are in parallel circulation, they can strengthen the transmission mechanism of the monetary and credit policy and increase the centralization of assets on the Central Bank balance sheet, as well as reduce the funding provided by credit institutions.

About the Authors

D. A. Kochergin
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Dmitrii A. Kochergin —  Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Department of Credit Theory and Financial Management


A. I. Yangirova
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Alsu I. Yangirova —  Postgraduate Student, Department of Credit Theory and Financial Management


References

1. Kochergin D. A. The roles of virtual currencies in the modern payment system. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika = St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies (SUJES). 2017;33(1):119–140. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu05.2017.107

2. Mau V. A. National goals and model of economic growth: New in the Russian socio-economic policy of 2018– 2019. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2019;(3):5–28. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2019–3–5–28

3. Kiselev A. Does the digital currency of central banks have a future: Analytical note. Moscow: Bank of Russia; 2017. 23 p. URL: http://www.cbr.ru/content/document/file/71328/analytic_note_190418_dip.pdf. (In Russ.).

4. Kochergin D. A. Electronic money. Moscow: Center for Research of Payment Systems and Settlements; 2011. 424 p. (In Russ.).

5. Berch M., Garratt R. Central bank cryptocurrencies. BIS Quarterly Review. 2017;(Sept.):55–70. URL: https://www. bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt1709f.pdf.

6. Kochergin D. A. Development and regulation of electronic money systems in Asian financial centers. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2017;61(7):54–63. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131–2227–2017–61–7–54–63

7. Kaminska I. What is “utility settlement coin” really? Financial Times. Sept. 18, 2017. URL: https://ftalphaville. ft.com/2017/09/18/2193542/what-is-utility-settlement-coin-really/# (accessed on 15.06.2019).

8. Ali R., Barrdear J., Clews R., Southgate J. The economics of digital currencies. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin. 2014;54(3):276–286.

9. Barontini С., Holden H. Proceeding with caution — A survey on central bank digital currency. BIS Papers. 2019;(101). URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap101.pdf.

10. Ingves S. Going cashless. Finance & Development. 2018;55(2):11–12. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ ft/fandd/2018/06/central-banks-and-digital-currencies/point.pdf.

11. Arvidsson N. et al. The cashless society: When will merchants stop accepting cash in sweden — A research model. In: Feuerriegel S., Neumann D., eds. Enterprise applications, markets and services in the finance industry. Cham: Springer International Publ.; 2017:105–113. (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing Series. Vol. 276).

12. Engert W., Fung B. Central bank digital currency: Motivations and implications. Bank of Canada. Staff Discussion Paper. 2017;(16). URL: https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/sdp2017–16.pdf.

13. Garrat R. CAD-coin versus Fedcoin. R 3 Reports. 2016. URL: https://www.fi nextra.com/fi nextra-downloads/ newsdocs/cad-coin-versus.pdf.

14. Dalal D., Yong S., Lewis A. The future is here. Project Ubin: SGD on distributed ledger. Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore; 2017. 44 p. URL: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/sg/Documents/ fi nancial-services/sg-fsi-project-ubin-report.pdf.

15. Mancini-Griffoli T., Martinez Peria M., Agur I. et al. Casting light on central bank digital currency. IMF Staff Discussion Note. 2018;(08). URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/ Issues/2018/11/13/Casting-Light-on-Central-Bank-Digital-Currencies-46233.

16. Gürtler K., Nielsen S. et al. Central bank digital currency in Denmark? Danmarks Nationalbank Analysis. 2017;(28). URL: https://www.nationalbanken.dk/en/publications/Documents/2017/12/Analysis%20-%20 Central%20bank%20digital%20currency%20in%20Denmark.pdf.

17. Juks R. When a central bank digital currency meets private money: The effects of an e-krona on banks. Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review. 2018;(3):79–99. URL: https://www.riksbank.se/globalassets/media/rapporter/pov/ engelska/2018/economic-review-3–2018.pdf.

18. Kumhof M., Noone C. Central bank digital currencies — Design principles and balance sheet implications. Bank of England. Staff Working Paper. 2018;(725). URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/fi les/ working-paper/2018/central-bank-digital-currencies-design-principles-and-balance-sheet-implications.

19. Barrdear J., Kumhof M. The macroeconomics of central bank issued digital currencies. Bank of England. Staff Working Paper. 2016;(605). URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/fi les/working-paper/2016/themacroeconomics-of-central-bank-issued-digital-currencies.


Review

For citations:


Kochergin D.A., Yangirova A.I. Central bank Digital Currencies: Key Characteristics and Directions of Influence on Monetary and Credit and Payment Systems. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2019;23(4):80-98. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-4-80-98

Views: 2570


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)