Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

Investment Portfolio Optimization on Russian Stock Market in Context of behavioral theory

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-4-99-116

Abstract

The paper investigates possible investment portfolio optimization considering behavioral errors. The research rationale is due to the adaption of the investment recommendations for unqualified investors on the Russian stock market. In economic literature, the consequences of behavioral effects are not detailed enough when making a portfolio of Russian securities. The aim of the article is to make the most optimal portfolio based on the risk/reward ratio. The author made a hypothesis on applying various periods of profitability analysis to improve profitability indicators and increase the subjective probability of its achievement. To build a portfolio model, the behavioral portfolio theory and its optimization through linear programming were used. The study was based on modeling the investment portfolio of the most liquid stocks on the Russian stock market. Modified elements of the cumulative prospect theory with behavioral coefficients were used as indicators of profitability and probability. Based on the analysis results, the model of semi-annual portfolio analysis was proposed as a tool for portfolio optimization. The investor review of the portfolio semi-annual rate of profitability led to its best final index of effectiveness. In the medium-term assessment of portfolio profitability, the influence of behavioral factors decreases while maximizing returns with medium high risk. The research result is consistent with the basics of behavioral economics as the prospect theory regarding risk and loss aversion. Moreover, the factor of frequency of access to information and the degree of naive portfolio diversification with high profitability are promising areas for the development of research in behavioral finance. However, determining by the investor the objective probability to achieve the expected return level by using specific benchmarks is controversial.

About the Author

N. M. Red’kin
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Nikita M. Red’kin —  Postgraduate Student, Department of Finance, Money Circulation and Credit


References

1. Markowitz H. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance.1952;7(1):77–91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–6261.1952. tb01525.x

2. De Giorgi E. G., Legg S. Dynamic portfolio choice and asset pricing with narrow framing and probability weighting. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2012;36(7):951–972. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2012.01.010

3. Shefrin H., Statman M. Behavioral portfolio theory. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2000;35(2):127–151. DOI: 10.2307/2676187

4. De Giorgi E. G., Mahmoud O. Naive diversification preferences and their representation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2016. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2864231

5. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47(2):263– 292. DOI: 10.2307/1914185

6. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453– 458. DOI: 10.1126/science.7455683

7. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business. 1986;59(4):251–278. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–642–74919–3_4

8. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1992;5(4):297–323. DOI: 10.1007/BF00122574

9. Williams J. B. The theory of investment value. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1938. 613 p.

10. Thaler R. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science. 1985;4(3):199–214. DOI: 10.1287/ mksc.1070.0330

11. Lopes L. L. Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1987;20:255–295. DOI: 10.1016/S 0065–2601(08)60416–5

12. Shefrin H., Statman M. Behavioral aspects of the design and marketing of financial products. Financial Management.1993;22(2):123–134. DOI: 10.2307/3665864

13. Shefrin H., Statman M. Explaining investor preference for cash dividends. Journal of Financial Economics. 1984;13(2):253–282. DOI: 10.1016/0304–405X(84)90025–4

14. Lakonishok J., Lee I., Pearson N., Poteshman A. Option market activity. The Review of Financial Studies. 2007;20(3):813–857. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhl025

15. Poteshman A., Serbin V. Clearly irrational financial market behavior: Evidence from the early exercise of exchange traded stock options. The Journal of Finance. 2003;58(1):37–70. DOI: 10.1111/1540–6261.00518

16. McConnell J., Schwartz E. The origin of LYONs: A case study in financial innovation. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 1992;4(4):40–47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745–6622.1992.tb00216.x

17. Das S. R., Statman M. Options and structured products in behavioral portfolios. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2013;37(1):137–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2012.07.004

18. Das S. R., Markowitz H., Scheid J., Statman M. Portfolio optimization with mental accounts. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2010;45(2):311–334. DOI: 10.1017/S 0022109010000141

19. Das S. R., Ostrov D. N., Radhakrishnan A., Srivastav D. A new approach to goals-based wealth management. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3117765

20. De Giorgi E. G., Hens T. Prospect theory and mean-variance analysis: Does it make a difference in wealth management? Investment Management and Financial Innovations. 2009;6(1):122–129. DOI: 10.5167/uzh-50736

21. De Giorgi E. G. Loss aversion with multiple investment goals. Mathematics and Financial Economics. 2011;5(3):203–227. DOI: 10.1007/s11579–011–0057-y

22. Barberis N., Huang M. Preferences with frames: A new utility specification that allows for the framing of risks. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2009;33(8):1555–1576. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2009.01.009

23. De Giorgi E. G., Mahmoud O. Naive diversification preferences and their representation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2016. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2864231

24. Evstigneev V. R. Subjective image of the forthcoming — How FX market participants construct their prospects on the nearest future. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2014;5:66–83. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2014–5–66–83

25. El’tsov U. V. Behavioral finance and Forex market forecasting. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomika = The World Economics. 2010;(12):18–29. (In Russ.).

26. Evstigneev V. R. Forecasting returns on the stock market. Мoscow: Maroseika; 2009. 192 p. (In Russ.).

27. Evstigneev V. R. Modeling traders’ expectations in the FX market in terms of distributions with a functional parameter. Nauchno-issledovatel’skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal. 2014;(1):25–34. (In Russ.).

28. Goretskaya V. А. Behavioral finance: Applying perspective theory to financial management. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2014;(4):28–35. (In Russ.).

29. Ivanitskii V. P., Tat’yannikov V. A. Information asymmetry in financial markets: Challenges and threats. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region. 2018;14(4):1156–1167. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/2018–4–8

30. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1991;106(4):1039–1061. DOI: 10.2307/2937956

31. Berzon N. I., Volodin S. N. Evaluation of financial assets by “risk-return” criterion taking into account the duration of the investment. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = The HSE Economic Journal. 2010;14(3):311–325. (In Russ.).

32. Grishina N., Lucas C. A., Date P. Prospect theory-based portfolio optimization: An empirical study and analysis using intelligent algorithms. Quantitative Finance. 2016;17(3):353–367. DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2016.1149611

33. Hayes M. G. Value and probability. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 2006;28(3):527–538. DOI: 10.2753/ PKE 0160–3477280308


Review

For citations:


Red’kin N.M. Investment Portfolio Optimization on Russian Stock Market in Context of behavioral theory. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2019;23(4):99-116. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-4-99-116

Views: 1519


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)