Estimation of Impact of Quantitative Easing Policy on EUR/USD using behavioral Equilibrium Exchange Rate Model

The article examines the impact of the policy of the uSA quantitative easing and the euro area on the nominal EuR/ uSD exchange rate. After the economic crisis of 2008–2009, the policy of quantitative easing gained popularity among the world’s largest economies. The largest programs were implemented by the uS Federal Reserve (uS Federal Reserve System) and the European Central Bank (ECB). However, the impact of the actual purchase volume of securities on the EuR/uSD exchange rate within these policies has been little studied in modern literature. The author collected the data from 1999 to 2018 on the exchange rate, macroeconomic and market indicators, and calculated the monthly actual purchase volumes of securities under the asset purchase program of the united States and the euro area. The behavioral equilibrium exchange rate model was used. The linear model specification and the error correction model identified no significant impact of the ECB quantitative easing policy expressed in the actual purchase volume of securities. However, for some specifications, it has been proven that the increase in purchases of securities by the uS Federal Reserve leads to a weakening of the dollar against the euro. The cointegration test revealed a long-term dependence of the EuR/uSD exchange rate on the accumulated volumes of acquired assets. Thus, an increase in the purchase volume of securities led to a weakening of the dollar against the euro. The insignificant impact of the European Central Bank quantitative easing policy could have been caused by market expectations formed prior to the actual purchase of ECB securities in the market.

macroeconomics, finance, economic policy, non-standard monetary policy, quantitative easing, euro area, European Central Bank (ECB), Federal Reserve System, exchange rate, EuR/uSD, VECM, BEER

1. Ferrari M., Kearns J. Monetary policy’s rising FX impact in the era of ultra-low rates. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2017. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2917454

2. Clark P., MacDonald R. Exchange rates and economic fundamentals: A methodological comparison of BEERS and FEERS. IMF Working Paper. 1998;(67). URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp9867.pdf

3. Krishnamurthy A., Nagel S., Vissing-Jorgensen A. ECB policies involving government bond purchases: Impact and channels. Review of Finance. 2018;22(1):1–44. DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfx053

4. Altavilla C., Carboni G., Motto R. Asset purchase programmes and financial markets: Lessons from the euro area. European Central Bank. Working Paper Series. 2015;(1864). URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ ecbwp1864.en.pdf

5. Diebold F., Nerlove M. The dynamics of exchange rate volatility: A multivariate latent factor ARCH model. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 1989;4(1):1–21. DOI: 10.1002/jae.3950040102

6. Meese R., Rogoff K. Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies: Do they fit out of sample? Journal of International Economics. 1983;14(1–2):3–24. DOI: 10.1016/0022–1996(83)90017–X

7. Dal Bianco M., Camacho M., Perez Quiros G. Short-run forecasting of the euro-dollar exchange rate with economic fundamentals. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2012;31(2):377–396. DOI: 10.1016/j. jimonfin.2011.11.018

8. Dedola L., Georgiadis G., Gräb J., Mehl A. Does a big bazooka matter? Central Bank balance-sheet policies and exchange rates. European Central Bank. Working Paper Series. 2018;(2197). URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecb.wp2197.en.pdf?57433fee929acc0a4165dafd2fd2064a.

9. Engel C. The forward discount anomaly and the risk premium: A survey of recent evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance. 1996;3(2):123–192. DOI: 10.1016/0927–5398(95)00016–X

10. Bilson J. Recent developments in monetary models of exchange rate determination. IMF Staff Papers. 1979;26(2):201–223. DOI: 10.2307/3866509

11. Dornbusch R. Expectations and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy. 1976;84(6):1161–1176. DOI: 10.1086/260506

12. Frankel J. On the mark: A theory of floating exchange rates based on real interest differentials. The American Economic Review. 1979;69(4):610–622.

13. Frankel J. Tests of monetary and portfolio balance models of exchange rate determination. In: Bilson J. F.O., Marston R. C., eds. Exchange rate theory and practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1984:239–260. URL: https://www.nber.org/chapters/c6837.pdf.

14. Boeckx J., Dossche M., Peersman G. Effectiveness and transmission of the ECB’s balance sheet policies. International Journal of Central Banking. 2017;13(1):297–333. URL: https://www.ijcb.org/journal/ijcb17q0a8.pdf

15. Adler G., Lama R., Medina J. Unconventional policies and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2019;95:402–423. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2018.03.014

16. Engel C., Mark N., West K. Factor model forecasts of exchange rates. Econometric Reviews. 2015;34(1–2):32–55. DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2014.944467

17. Drobyshevsky S. M., Trunin P. V., The evolution of theory and practice of monetary policy as a result of the global economic crisis. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2014;(4):141– 158. (In Russ.).

18. Vashchelyuk N. V., Trunin P. V. Non-standard monetary policy measures: International experience and Russian practice. Moscow: Delo; 2016. 110 p. (In Russ.).

19. Krishnamurthy A., Vissing-Jorgensen A. The effects of quantitative easing on interest rates: Channels and implications for policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2011;43(2):215–287. DOI: 10.1353/eca.2011.0019

20. Hausken K., Ncube M. Quantitative easing and its impact in the US, Japan, the UK and Europe. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2013. 123 p.