Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Designing a balance Model for Reproducing Investment Potential of Institutional Sectors in the Regional System

Reproducing investment potential of institutional sectors of the economy of any territorial system becomes a challenging issue in the light of recent trends: lack of financial resources for modernization and development of the real sector of economy, failure to successful implementing the planned strategic programs for economic development of territorial systems at macroeconomic, regional and municipal levels. A systematic approach to the formation and reproduction of

these resources is required. In this regard, the main purpose of the work was to develop methodological foundations of designing a balance model for reproducing the investment potential of institutional sectors in the regional system. The analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the existing approaches showed that a systematic representation of the reproduction processes of the investment potential of institutional sectors in the territorial systems requires a detailed mapping of the movement processes of financial resources between the sectors, as well as spatial features of the movement of their investment resources between the regional systems. Proposed in the work, the theoretical and methodological approach uses the basic principles of the system of national accounts: “double entry”, according to which one sector initiates the movement of financial flows, and the other accepts them; financial account structure of institutional sectors. Moran’s spatial autocorrelation and autoregression method was also applied. Thus, it provides to assess the investment resource endowment of the sectors and their sufficiency to solve the most important development problems, to determine the main uses of these resources by institutional sectors, and the riskiness of their investment activities. Such an approach provides an opportunity for state authorities and a financial regulator to assess the system of investment interconnections between institutional sectors that has developed in the regions, the problems and threats of financial development of these sectors, and to find reserves to solve them.

1. Popov P. I., ed. The balance of the national economy of the USSR 1923–1924. Moscow: Republican Information and Publ. Center; 1993. 654 p. (In Russ.).

2. Leontief W. The balance of the national economy of the USSR. Methodological analysis of the work of the Central Statistical Office. Planovoe khozyaistvo. 1925;(12):254–258. (In Russ.).

3. Eidel’man M.R. Intersectoral balance of public product. Moscow: Statistika; 1966. 381 p. (In Russ.).

4. Bashkatov B. I., Nazarova O.V., Nesterov L. I., Ponomarenko A. N., Ryabushkin B. T., Chobanu K. G. National Bookkeeping. Moscow: Finansy i statistika; 2002. 238 p. (In Russ.).

5. Stone R. Functions and criteria of a system of social accounting. Review of Income and Wealth. 1951;1(1):1–74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1951.tb01036.x

6. Pyatt G., Round J. I. Accounting and fixed price multipliers in a social accounting matrix framework. The Economic Journal. 1979;89(356):850–873. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/98c7/cb8f70616ca4fe22b7816d05ca55547bedb1.pdf

7. Defourny J., Thorbecke E. Structural path analysis and multiplier decomposition within a social accounting matrix framework. The Economic Journal. 1984;94(373):111–136. DOI: 10.2307/2232220

8. Khan H., Thorbecke E. Macroeconomic effects of technology choice: Multiplier and structural path analysis within a SAM framework. Journal of Policy Modeling. 1989;11(1):131–156. DOI: 10.1016/0161-8938(89)90028-8

9. Belousov A. R., Abramova E.A. Experimental development of integrated matrices of financial flows. Voprosy statistiki. 1999;(7):11–24. (In Russ.).

10. Mikheeva N.N. Matrices of social accounts: Areas of research and restrictions on use. EKO. 2011;(6):103–118. (In Russ.).

11. Dondokov Z.B-D. Multiplier effects in the economy. Ulan-Ude: East Siberia State Univ. of Technology and Management; 2000. 144 p. (In Russ.).

12. Ermakova S. Yu. Multiplier effects in economics and problems of industrial ecology. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 19. Ekonomika. 2006;(2):183–190. (In Russ.).

13. Zakharchenko N. G. Using social accounting matrices in modeling the structure of economic system. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2012;(1):69–89. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14530/se.2012.1.069-089

14. Vlasyuk L. I., Zakharchenko N. G., Kalashnikov V. D. Studying regional macroeconomic proportions and multiplier effects: Khabarovsk Krai. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2012;(2):44–66. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14530/se.2012.2.044-066

15. Naumov I. V. Scenario modeling of the processes of movement of financial flows between institutional sectors in the regional territorial system. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2018;22(1):32–49. (In Russ.). DOI:

16. Naumov I.V. Theoretical and methodological basis of a scenario approach to modeling the matrix of financial flows in a regional system. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2017;(3):8–17. (In Russ.).

17. Naumov I. V. Theoretical and methodological approach to the formation of a matrix of financial flows of the regional territorial system. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii = Russian Journal of the Economic Theory. 2016;(3):171–188. (In Russ.).

18. Anselin L. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1988. 304 p.

19. Geary R. The continiguity ratio and statistical mapping. The Incorporated Statistician. 1954;(5):115–145. DOI: 10.2307/2986645

20. Getis A., Ord J.K. Local spatial statistics: An overview. In: Longley P., Batty M., eds. Spatial analysis: Modeling in a GIS environment. Cambridge, New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996:261–277.

21. Moran P. The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. 1948;10(2):243–251.

22. Pavlov Yu.V., Koroleva E. N. Spatial interactions: Estimation based on global and local Moran indices. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2014;(3):95–110. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14530/se.2014.3.95-110