Comparative Study of Discounted Cash Flow and Energy Return on Investment: Review of Oil and Gas Resource Economic Evaluation
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2020-24-2-50-59
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to develop a methodology for evaluating oil and gas fields return on investments based on not only finance, but also environmental and social interrelations. The subject of the study is a comparison of methods for calculating return on investments on the example of China, Canada and Russia’s oil and gas companies. The authors used a comparative method of calculations, as well as a case study — a comparison of return on investments methods on the example of oil and gas enterprises. In the paper, the authors analyze the next traditional methods of economic assessment: net present value, differential rent, reserve and multiple costs. The authors suggest using a new assessment method that determines the energy return on investment (EROI). This method does not rely on traditional analysis of net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and financial sensitivity. It comprehensively takes into account the costs of energy production, environmental protection and energy efficiency. Based on the results of the study, the authors conclude that the advantages of various methods of economic assessment should be integrated in order to avoid disadvantages and create a new dynamic integrated system of economic assessment. Oil and gas companies may use the results of the study to implement the energy return on investment methodology concerning oil and gas fields’ evaluation. A promising direction for further research may be to compare the energy return on investment at oil and gas enterprises in different countries as well as developing corporate reporting concerning energy return on investment improving efficiency.
Supporting agencies: This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 71874202/71874201), China Unviersity of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, China.
About the Authors
J. Yan
China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
China
China
Yan Jun — PhD student, Institute of Economics and Management
Beijing
L. Feng
China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
China
China
Lianyong Feng — PhD, Prof., Institute of Economics and Management
Beijing
A. N. Steblyanskaya
Harbin Engineering University
China
China
Alina N. Steblyanskaya — PhD, Assoc. Prof., Institute of Economics and Management
Harbin
S. Fu
Harbin Engineering University
China
China
Shanna Fu — PhD, Lecturer, Institute of Economics and Management
Harbin
References
1. Yuan J., Luo D., Feng L. A review of the technical and economic evaluation techniques for shale gas development. Applied Energy. 2015;148:49–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.040
2. Huang Shengquan. Project evaluation index — expansion of net present value. Technology Economics and Management Research. 2001;6:29–31.
3. Hu Y., Feng L.Y., Qi C. et al. EROI and its application in China-Daqing oil field. China Mining Magazine. 2014;9:30–34. (In Chinese). DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004–4051.2014.09.009
4. Hall C. A.S., Lambert J. G., Balogh S. B. EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy. 2014;64:141–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.049
5. Dale M., Krumdieck S., Bodger P. Global energy modelling — A biophysical approach (GEMBA). Part 1: An overview of biophysical economics. Ecological Economics. 2012;73:152–157. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.014
6. Yan J., Feng L., Steblyanskaya A., Sokolov A., Iskritskaya N. Creating an energy analysis concept for oil and gas companies: The case of the Yakutiya company in Russia. Energies. 2019;12:2:268. DOI: 10.3390/en12020268
7. King C. An integrated biophysical and economic modeling framework for long-term sustainability analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2019. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3334615
8. Freeman M. C., Groom B., Panopoulou E., Pantelidis T. Declining discount rates and the Fisher Effect: Inflated past, discounted future? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2015;73:32–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2015.06.003
9. Luo D. An analysis of indices for economic evaluation of petroleum exploration and development investment. International Petroleum Economics. 2002;(12):40–42. (In Chinese).
10. Hodder J. E., Riggs H. E. Pitfalls in evaluating risky projects. Harvard Business Review. 1985;(Jan.):128–135. URL: https://hbr.org/1985/01/pitfalls-in-evaluating-risky-projects
11. Hall C. A.S., Cleveland C. J. Petroleum drilling and production in the United States: Yield per effort and net energy analysis. Science. 1981;211(4482):576–579. DOI: 10.1126/science.211.4482.576
12. Yan J., Feng L., Steblyanskaya A., Kleiner G., Rybachuk M. Biophysical economics as a new economic paradigm. International Journal of Public Administration. 2019;42(15–16):1395–1407. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1645691
13. Lambert J. G., Hall C. A.S., Balogh S., Gupta A., Arnold M. Energy, EROI and quality of life. Energy Policy. 2014;64:153–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.001
14. Hall C. A.S., Klitgaard K. A. Energy and the wealth of nations: Understanding the biophysical economy. New York, Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media; 2011. 407 p.
15. Wang K., Feng L., Wang J., Xiong Y., Tverberg G. E. An oil production forecast for China considering economic limits. Energy. 2016;113:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.051
16. Wang K., Vredenburg H., Wang T., Feng L. Financial return and energy return on investment analysis of oil sands, shale oil and shale gas operations. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;223:826–836. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.039
Review
For citations:
Yan J., Feng L., Steblyanskaya A.N., Fu S. Comparative Study of Discounted Cash Flow and Energy Return on Investment: Review of Oil and Gas Resource Economic Evaluation. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2020;24(2):50-59. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2020-24-2-50-59
Views:
1190
Email this article 