Tax Policy Directions in Russia and the Possibility of Reducing the Tax Burden on Domestic Producers Operating in the Home Market
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2020-24-4-104-119
Abstract
The relevance of the research topic is due to the role of tax policy and the impact of external and internal longterm factors affecting the slowdown of the Russian economy. The aim of the study is to justify measures to reduce the tax burden on manufacturers concentrated on the domestic market. The authors used methods of statistical analysis, economic statistics, including the calculations of implicit tax rates, and the tax burden sensitivity in relation to GDP dynamics. The research results show that an increase in the tax burden on labor and consumption, as well as the existing correlation between the tax burden on capital and labor, hinders investments in the modernization of production and innovation, and disrupts economic growth and socio-economic development in Russia. The measures introduced by the government to overcome the consequences of the pandemic do not help to reduce the tax burden in a short-term and long-term perspective. The authors conclude that it is necessary to reduce the tax burden on domestic producers concentrated on the domestic market by introducing a special taxpayer status.
Keywords
JEL: E60, E62
About the Authors
I. S. BukinaRussian Federation
Irina S. Bukina — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher.
Moscow
Competing Interests: not
A. I. Smirnov
Russian Federation
Andrei I. Smirnov — student (2-year), Faculty of Economics and Finance of the Fuel and Energy Complex.
Moscow
Competing Interests: not
References
1. Barnichon R., Matthes C., Price D. A. Are the effects of fiscal policy asymmetric? Richmond Fed Economic Brief. 2017;(09). URL: https://www.richmondfed.org/-/media/richmondfedorg/publications/research/economic_brief/2017/pdf/eb_17-09.pdf
2. Kudrin A., Knobel A. Russian budget structure efficiency: Empirical study. Russian Journal of Economics. 2018;4(3);197-214. DOI: 10.3897/j.ruje.4.30163
3. Batini N., Eyraud L., Weber A. A simple method to compute fiscal multipliers. IMF Working Paper. 2014;(93). URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp1493.pdf
4. Molnar G., Soos G. D., Vilagi B. Fiscal policy and the business cycle. Financial and Economic Review. 2017;16(4):58-85. DOI: 10.25201/FER.16.4.5885
5. Auerbach A. J., Gorodnichenko Y. Fiscal multipliers in recessions and expansions. NBER Working Paper. 2011;(17447). URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/w17447.pdf
6. Michaillat P. Fiscal multipliers over the business cycle. CEP Discussion Papers. 2012;(1115). URL: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1115.pdf
7. Borsi M. T. Fiscal multipliers across the credit cycle. Journal of Macroeconomics. 2018;56:135-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2018.01.004
8. Karras G. Macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Evidence from a sample of OECD countries. SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business. 2019;69(3):111-138.
9. Barro R. J., Redlick C. J. Macroeconomic effects from government purchases and taxes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2011;126(1):51-102. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjq002
10. Blanchard O., Perotti R. An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2002;117(4):1329-1368. DOI: 10.1162/003355302320935043
11. Perotti R. The effects of tax shocks on output: Not so large, but not small either. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2012;4(2):214-237. DOI: 10.1257/pol.4.2.214
12. Romer C. D., Romer D. H. The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. American Economic Review. 2010;100(3):763-801. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.3.763
13. Lykova L. N. Tax burden in the Russian Federation: A comparative analysis point of view. Journal of Tax Reform. 2015;1(1):76-89. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2015.1.1.005
14. Lykova L. N. Possibilities of using SNA indicators for tax burden estimates: Report. Moscow: RAS Institute of Economics; 2016. URL: https://inecon.org/docs/Lykova_paper_20160602.pdf (In Russ.).
15. Government finance statistics manual 2014. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2014. 446 p. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/Pubs/FT/GFS/Manual/2014/gfsfinal.pdf (accessed on 06.03.2020).
16. L’vov D. S. National dividend concept — a global model of the 21st century. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2001;(3):5-23. (In Russ.).
17. Vlasov S. A., Deryugina E. B. Fiscal multipliers in Russia. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2018;(2):104-119. (In Russ.).
18. Tatarkin D. A., Sidorova E. N., Trynov A. V. Optimization of financial flow management based on the estimates of regional multiplicative effects. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region. 2015;(4):323-335. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/2015-4-25
19. Votinov A. I., Elkina M. A. Estimation of fiscal stimulus efficiency in Russian economy: Simple DSGE model with government sector. Nauchno-issledovatel’skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal. 2018;(5):83-96. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31107/2075-19902018-5-83-96
20. Gromov A. D. Impact of public spending on economic growth. Nauchno-issledovatel’skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal. 2015;(4):62-71. (In Russ.).
21. Bukina I. S. Fiscal policy of Russia in the period of economic growth slowdown, and the results of 2018. Federalizm = Federalism. 2019;(1):86-99. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Bukina I.S., Smirnov A.I. Tax Policy Directions in Russia and the Possibility of Reducing the Tax Burden on Domestic Producers Operating in the Home Market. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2020;24(4):104-119. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2020-24-4-104-119