Factors of Financial Imbalance in the Compulsory Pension Insurance System: the Case of Russia

The aim of the article is to study the impact of tax and tariff policy on the financial balance of the compulsory pension insurance system in Russia, as well as to substantiate proposals for its financial stabilization. The authors analyzed the consequences of regression applied on wages while forming tariffs for pensions. The methods used in this study were economic, statistical and empirical methods, analysis and synthesis, abstraction, systemic-structural approach. The authors analyzed the influence of preferential tariffs for certain types of economic activity and the use of simplified tax systems for organizations on the income of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation. The work contains the calculation of income shortfalls in the compulsory pension insurance system resulting from the use of regression and tax benefits when calculating insurance payments to the budget of the Pension Fund of Russia. The authors estimated the financial consequences of the pension valorization in the Soviet period and the pension indexation policy in Russia resulted in the rising costs of the Pension Fund of Russia. The conclusion is that the current procedure for determining insurance contributions to the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation, which provides for a large number of benefits, does not correspond to generally accepted world practice and creates major risks for the financial balance of the pension system. This may cause increasing poverty among seniors. Raising the retirement age did not solve the problem of balancing the pension system, but exacerbated it. The regression in the payment of insurance premiums led to a conundrum in Russia, when an increase in wages resulted in the decrease of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation’s income. This is associated with the precarization of wages and the desire of business to minimize tax payments. The prospect of further research is to study the conditions for financial stabilization of compulsory pension insurance during the Russian economic crisis. The analysis showed that there is a need to create an independent actuarial center for setting tariffs for deductions to the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation, as well as the redistribution of areas of responsibility between the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Finance of Russia.

1. Kudrin A., Gurvich E. Population aging and the threat of a budget crisis. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2012;(3):52-79. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2012-3-52-79

2. Overmans R. Deutsche militarische Verluste im Zweiten Weltkrieg. 2. Auflage. Munchen: De Gruyter Oldenbourg Verlag; 2000. 367 s. (Beitrage zur Militargeschichte. Bd. 46).

3. Safonov A. L., Anyushina M. A. Socio-economic consequences of the pension system reforms being implemented in Russia and their impact on the country‘s economic security. Trud i sotsial’nye otnosheniya = Labour and Social Relations. 2019;(4):5-15. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20410/2073-7815-201930-4-5-15

4. Yushkova O. O. Dispute changes to tax legislation and their possible consequences. Simvol nauki = Symbol of Science. 2017;(4):187-193. URL: http://os-russia.com/SBORNIKI/SN-2017-04_1.pdf (accessed on 20.07.2020). (In Russ.).

5. Gontmakher E. Sh. Pension systems: World and Russia’s experience. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economy. 2008;(9):37-80. (In Russ.).

6. Rudenko G. G., Dolzhenkova Yu. V. The Russian labor market: The ratio of state regulation and selfadjustment mechanisms. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika = Herald of Omsk University. Series: Economics. 2019;17(3):161-169. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25513/1812-3988.2019.17(3).161-169

7. Degtyarev G. P., Degtyarev A. G. Pension system in Germany: parameters, structure, main characteristics. Sotsial’no-trudovye issledovaniya = Social and Labour Research. 2020;(1):139-152. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34022/2658-3712-2020-38-1-139-152

8. Bukhtiyarov I. V., Daletskaya N. A., Daletskii A. A. et al. Criteria for disability in determining the retirement age and ways to modernize the compulsory social insurance system. Moscow, Berlin: Direct-Media; 2019. 1658 p. (In Russ.).

9. Grinberg R. S., Safonov A. L. Raising the retirement age in Russia, or how budget mythology exacerbates the social disadvantage of the country. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2019;(2):167-176. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2019-42-2-9

10. Pis’menskii G. I. Filimonova I. V. Ermak L. A. Consequences of simple decisions in the field of labour and human capital development. Chelovecheskii kapital = Human Capital. 2019;(6-2):20-26. (In Russ.).

11. Voronin Yu.M., Maksimov Yu. N. Once again, on the reform of the pension reform of the 2018 model: It is prudent to postpone — the appeal of scientists to the deputies of the State Duma. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomika = The World Economics. 2019;(7):67-74. (In Russ.).

12. Motegi H., Nishimura Y., Oikawa M. Retirement and health investment behaviors: An international comparison. Journal of the Economics of Ageing. 2020;17:100239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2020.100239

13. Romp W., Beetsma R. Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics. 2020;93:125-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.009

14. Sanchez-Romero M., Prskawetz A. The impact of reducing the pension generosity on inequality and schooling. De Economist. 2020;168(2):279-304. DOI: 10.1007/s10645-020-09359-w

15. Charni K. Do the French pension reforms increase reemployment of older unemployed workers? Applied Economics. 2020;52(19):2015-2043. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2019.1682114

16. Yeh M.-J. Long-term care system in Taiwan: The 2017 major reform and its challenges. Ageing & Society. 2020;40(6):1334-1351. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X18001745