Scenario modelling of the impact of the dynamics of public debt on the gross regional product of Russian regions

The subject of this research is public debt and its impact on the dynamics of the gross regional product (GRP) of Russian regions. The aim of the paper is to study and scenario forecast the dynamics of changes in the internal public debt of Russian regions and model its impact on the gross regional product. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that most regions in Russia are forced to increase their internal public debt to cover the budget deficit and attract additional resources to solve important problems of socio-economic development and implement strategic projects and programs. The scientific novelty of the research consists in the development of a methodological approach to modelling and scenario forecasting of the level of GRP of different groups of regions, taking into account the dynamics of changes in their public debt using ARIMA modelling methods and panel regression analysis. The authors apply the methods of panel regression analysis and ARIMA modelling. The authors theoretically substantiated that public debt has a different effect on the GRP of Russian regions, grouped the regions according to the identified trends in the dynamics of public debt (the first group — regions with the dynamics of debt reduction over the period from 2005 to 2019, the second group — with the all-Russian trend of debt reduction since 2017, and the third group — with the dynamics of increasing debt over the period under review); developed a methodological approach to modelling and scenario forecasting of the GRP level of the Russian regions, taking into account the dynamics of changes in their public debt; carried out ARIMA forecasting of the dynamics of the public debt of different groups of regions and built regression models of the influence of the dynamics of the public debt on the GRP of Russian regions within the selected groups; formed forecast scenarios for changes of the GRP level of regions, taking into account the identified dynamics of transformation of their internal public debt. Conclusions: public debt has a negative impact on the dynamics of the GRP of Moscow and the Moscow region and a positive effect on the dynamics of the GRP of the regions of the second and third groups. The findings of the study may be used by the federal and regional executive authorities to find ways to reduce public debt and increase the level of socio-economic development of territories.

1. Kisel’ I. V. Public debt in the system of economic relations. In: Sustainable development of the economy: State, problems, prospects. Proc. 5th Int. sci.-pract. conf. (Pinsk, Apr. 28–29, 2011). (in 2 pts.). Pt. 1. Pinsk: Polessky State University; 2011:49–51. (In Russ.).

2. Parasotskaya N. N., Yakovlev N. D. Pros and cons of public borrowing and public debt for the Russian budget system. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2019;6(4):61–69. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2408–9303–2019–6–4–61–69

3. Li S., Cao P. Does local government debt promote China’s new urbanization? The Chinese Economy. 2020;53(4):342–354. DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2020.1728482

4. Zhao R., Tian Y., Lei A., Boadu F., Ren Z. The effect of local government debt on regional economic growth in China: A nonlinear relationship approach. Sustainability. 2019;11(11):3065. DOI: 10.3390/su11113065

5. Carlo A. C. The impact of the balanced budget principle on regional financial autonomy in Italy. Revista General de Derecho Constitucional. 2018;(27):420010.

6. Yong S. W., Suhaimi R., Chai S. Y. The effect of public debt on FDI-growth nexus: Threshold regression analysis. Advanced Science Letters. 2017;23(8):7342–7345. DOI: 10.1166/asl.2017.9470

7. Mokhnatkina L. B. Budget balance and government debt as indicators of region’s financial and budgetary security. Nauchno-issledovatel’skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Research Financial Institute. Financial Journal. 2018;(2):106–119. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31107/2075–1990–2018–2–106–119

8. Soldatkin S. N. The effectiveness of regional debt policy through the prism of investment activity. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice. 2015;(30):46–57. (In Russ.).

9. Afonso A., Alves J. The role of government debt in economic growth. Hacienda Pública Española = Review of Public Economics. 2015;(4):9–26. DOI: 10.7866/HPE-RPE.15.4.1

10. Panizza U., Presbitero A. F. Public debt and economic growth: Is there a causal effect? Journal of Macroeconomics. 2014;41:21–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.03.009

11. Gagarina G., Chaynikova L., Arkhipova L. The role of the analysis of sustainable development of regions of Russia in the strategic planning. Federalizm = Federalism. 2019;(4):5–21. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21686/2073–1051–2019–4–5–21

12. Cecchetti S. G., Mohanty M. S., Zampolli F. The real effects of debt. BIS Working Paper. 2011;(352). URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/work352.pdf

13. Kumykov A. A. Public debt: Economic nature and place in the economic mechanism. Doct. econ. sci. diss. Synopsis. Moscow; 2003. 52 p. (In Russ.).

14. Chen S., Li W. Local government debt and regional economic growth in China. China Political Economy. 2019;2(2):330–353. DOI: 10.1108/CPE‑10–2019–0028

15. Matvienko K. V. Economic security strategy in the system of government debt policy management in Russia. Doct. econ. sci. diss. Synopsis. Yoshkar-Ola: Volga State University of Technology; 2020. 48 p. (In Russ.).

16. Zhigaev A. Yu. A plot method for forecasting of dynamics of government debts in a medium-term outlook. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = The HSE Economic Journal. 1999;3(3):395–422. (In Russ.).

17. Tsvirko S. E. Modeling the dynamics of Russia’s external debt. Cand. econ. sci. diss. Synopsis. Moscow: Financial Academy under the RF Government; 2004. 28 p. (In Russ.).

18. Kolodyazhnaya A. Yu. Forecasting the public debt of the Orenburg oblast through the analytical alignment method. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience. 2016;(12):37–46. (In Russ.).

19. Tolstobrova N. A., Postnikov V. P., Kamenskikh M. A. The impact of public debt on the dynamics of economic development in the Russian Federation. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2013;(20):37–42. (In Russ.).

20. Kovtun N. V., Dolinovskaya O. Ya., Ignatyuk V. V. Modeling public debt in the face of financial instability. Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya). 2013;(17):101–116. (In Russ.).

21. Zhuravka F., Filatova H., Aiyedogbon J. O. Government debt forecasting based on the Arima model. Public and Municipal Finance. 2019;8(1):120–127. DOI: 10.21511/pmf.08(1).2019.11

22. Naumov I. V. Role of financial resources of the economy’s banking sector in Russian regions’ socio-economic development. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2020;13(6):152–168. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.6.72.9