Public Goals and Government Expenditures: Are the Solutions of the “Modern Monetary Theory” Realistic?

The relevance is determined by the presence of discussions among economists and political scientists about the state regulation role, especially during crises when governments are expected to provide an economic miracle solution or new measures that are not thought about during periods of growth. The subject of the study is government expenditures, which should be fairly distributed by governments in crisis times with a clear vision and understanding of public goals, for the achievement of which it is necessary to undertake economic changes. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to generalize the results of the discussion about the possibility of changing the economic “mainstream” to the “modern monetary theory” (MMT) and its prospects in public finance management. The research methods include systematic, critical, comparative and cross-country analysis and verification of the realism of the MMT’s proposals. The results of the study made it possible to analyze the economic solutions of the new theory based on the political subtext of the theory itself: is it possible to entrust governments with an unlimited budget filled with the issue of national currency; has there been a need to update public goals; what are the prospects for full employment with government funding of jobs; is it possible for society to subject taxes to increase or is there enough transparency and collection; is inflation dangerous in the current situation and in the future; is the MMT really an economic recipe for politicians focused on achieving public goals, including ecology and inequality. It is concluded that all-round criticism and all-round approval are equally unacceptable in relation to the new theory from the standpoint of practical state regulation. Some elements of the MMT have already been implemented in various countries, both successfully and with negative consequences. Therefore, when considering the MMT in unity with public goals, the criterion of choice should not be the quality of economic decisions, not their elegance and validity, but enforceability in accordance with urgent and strategic tasks that need to be solved by politicians.

1. Wray L.R. Modern monetary theory: A primer on macroeconomics for sovereign money systems. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. 289 p.

2. Wray L.R., Dantas F., Fullwiler S., Tcherneva P., Kelton S. Public service employment: A path to full employment. Annandale-on-Hudson, NY: Levy Economics Institute of Bard College; 2018. 52 p.

3. Mitchell W., Wray L.R., Watts M. Macroeconomics. London: Red Globe Press; 2019. 604 p.

4. Kelton S. The deficit myth: Modern monetary theory and the birth of the people’s economy. New York: Public Affairs; 2020. 336 p.

5. Andryushin S.A. Is money the creation of the state or the market? (On the “modern monetary theory” as described in the textbook by W. Mitchell, L.R. Wray and M. Watts “Macroeconomics”). Voprosy ekonomiki. 2020;(6):121–134. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2020–6–121–134

6. Afontsev S.A. Methodological foundations of modern economic and political analysis. Istoki. 1998;(3):72– 122. URL: https://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/402/700/1219/004Afontsev.pdf (In Russ.).

7. Skousen M. There’s much ruin in a nation: An analysis of modern monetary theory. Atlantic Economic Journal. 2020;48(1):11–21. DOI: 10.1007/s11293–020–09651–9

8. Chohan U.W. The lives or livelihoods? The coronavirus dilemma for administrations. CASS Working Papers on Economics & National Affairs. 2020: EC 021UC. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3584726

9. Putnam В.H. From phase transitions to Modern Monetary Theory: A framework for analyzing the pandemic of 2020. Review of Financial Economics. 2021;39(1):3–19. DOI: 10.1002/rfe.1122

10. Adil M. H., Hatekar N.R., Ghosh T. Role of money in the monetary policy: A new Keynesian and new monetarist perspective. In: Barnett W.A., Sergi B. S., eds. Environmental, social, and governance perspectives on economic development in Asia. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Ltd; 2021:37–67. (International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics. Vol. 29A). DOI: 10.1108/S 1571– 03862021000029A018

11. Baker A., Murphy R. Modern monetary theory and the changing role of tax in society. Social Policy and Society. 2020;19(3):454–469. DOI: 10.1017/S 1474746420000056

12. Baronian L. The time-spaces of capitalism: Suzanne De Brunhoff and monetary thought after Marx. Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2021;43(3):420–432. DOI: 10.1017/S 1053837220000218

13. Brady G. L. Modern monetary theory: Some additional dimensions. Atlantic Economic Journal. 2020;48(1):1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11293–020–09654–6

14. Coronado J. Giving MMT the credit it is due. Business Economics. 2020;55(1):23–25. DOI: 10.1057/s11369– 019–00158-z

15. Grdešić M. What does modern monetary theory offer? Croatian Political Science Review. 2020;57(3):99–118. DOI: 10.20901/pm.57.3.04

16. Epstein G.A. What’s wrong with modern money theory? A policy critique. Cham: Palgrave Pivot; 2019. 111 p. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–030–26504–5

17. Huang Y. Monetary sovereignty for public purpose sustaining and complementing China’s “new infrastructure”. Global Institute for Sustainable Prosperity Policy Report. 2020;(104). URL: http://www.globalisp.org/wp-content/uploads/PolicyReport 104.pdf

18. Mankiw N.G. A skeptic’s guide to modern monetary theory. AEA Papers and Proceedings. 2020;110:141–144. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20201102

19. Tavlas G. S. Modern monetary theory meets Greece and Chicago. Cato Journal. 2021;41(1):1–23. URL: https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2021–01/cj-v41n1–1.pdf

20. Mann C. L. Some observations on MMT: What’s right, not right, and what’s too simplistic. Business Economics. 2020;55(1):21–22. DOI: 10.1057/s11369–019–00153–4

21. Kirdina-Chandler S.G. Mechanism of money circulation as a subject of mesoeconomic analysis. Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovanii = Journal of Institutional Studies. 2019;11(3):7–20. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17835/2076–6297.2019.11.3.007–020

22. Mau V.A. Economics and politics in 2019–2020: Global challenges and national answers. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2020;(3):5–27. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2020–3–5–27

23. Afontsev S.A. Political markets and economic policy. Moscow: Lenand; 2015. 384 p. (In Russ.).

24. Palley T.I. Money, fiscal policy, and interest rates: A critique of Modern Monetary Theory. IMK Working Paper. 2013;(109). URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/105973/1/imk-wp_109_2013.pdf

25. Baranovsky V.G. New international order: Overcoming or transforming the existing pattern? Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2019;63(5):7–23. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131–2227–2019–63–5–7–23

26. Krugman P. What’s wrong with functional finance? (Wonkish). The New York Times. Feb. 12, 2019. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/12/opinion/whats-wrong-with-functional-finance-wonkish.html

27. Demidenko M., Bukreev K., Romanyuk V. Emission of the Central Bank: Myth and reality. Bankauskі vesnіk = Bank Bulletin Journal. 2020;(10):21–36. (In Russ.).

28. Rabbitt T. Modern monetary theory. Economics Honors Papers. 2020;(31). URL: https://digitalcommons. conncoll.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=econhp

29. Palley T.I. The critics of modern money theory (MMT) are right. Review of Political Economy. 2015;27(1):45–61. DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2014.957473

30. Friedman M. Lerner on the economics of control. Journal of Political Economy. 1947;55(5):405–416. DOI: 10.1086/256579