Multi-Capital Approach for Sustainable Growth: Experience from the Oil & Gas Companies
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-4-29-43
Abstract
Nowadays, companies traditionally use economic capital and follow the interests of profit-making by shareholders or financial structures. However, recently there has been a tendency to analyze non-financial factors affecting equity. Multicapitalism is a doctrine that studies the impact of social, environmental, and economic indicators on equity. The subject of the study is the Chinese oil and gas companies’ sustainable growth. The paper’s purpose is to consider the interdependence of non-financial indicators with the Higgins Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) and the Ivashkovskaya Sustainable Growth Index (SGI). The primary task is to solve the problems faced by China oil and gas companies regarding the introduction of non-financial reporting. The methodological basis of the study is a regression analysis of the influence of non-financial factors on sustainable growth indices. The authors analyze the impact of non-financial factors EROI, PRP, ES, ROEenv, ROL, ROEsr on the China oil and gas companies’ SGR and SGI. It is shown that non-financial indicators show a stronger correlation with SGR than SGI. The study’s main conclusion is that there is a significant positive correlation between individual non-financial indicators and sustainable growth indices. The practical application of the obtained research results is seen in the development of non-financial reporting of oil and gas companies in China by including indicators EROI, PRP, ES, ROEenv, ROL, ROEsr to assess the work of sustainable growth of the enterprise.
Keywords
JEL: F3, G0, G3, Q40, M2
About the Authors
A. N. SteblyanskayaChina
Alina N. Steblyanskaya — PhD, Assoc. Prof., School of Economics and Management
Harbin
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
Ai. Mingye
China
Mingye Ai — PhD, Assoc. Prof., School of Economics and Management
Harbin
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
O. V. Efimova
Russian Federation
Olga V. Efimova — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Chairman of the Economics, Organization of Production and Management Department
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
G. B. Kleiner
Russian Federation
Georgiy B. Kleiner — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Corresponding Member of RAS, Prof., Deputy Director, Central Economics and Mathematical Institute of RAS; Chairman of the Department of System Analysis in Economics, Financial University
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
M. А. Rybachuk
Russian Federation
Maksim A. Rybachuk — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Research Associate, Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Assoc. Prof., Financial University
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
References
1. Hopwood B., Mellor M., O’Brien G. Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development. 2005;13(1):38–52. DOI: 10.1002/sd.244
2. Higgins R. C. How much growth can a firm afford? Financial Management. 1977;6(3):7–16. DOI: 10.2307/3665251
3. Ivashkovskaya I., Stepanova A., Eliseeva N. Does corporate financial architecture contribute to sustainable corporate growth? The evidence from Russian companies. Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2014;8(4):11–33. DOI: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073–0438.8.4.2014.11–33
4. Davis G. F., Neumann Whitman M. von, Zald M. N. The responsibility paradox: Multinational firms and global corporate social responsibility. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.899112
5. Pan J. China’s environmental governing and ecological civilization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2016. 228 p. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–662–47429–7
6. Costanza R., Liu S. Ecosystem services and environmental governance: Comparing China and the U. S. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies. 2014;1(1):160–170. DOI: 10.1002/app5.16
7. Prasad E., Wei S.-J. The Chinese approach to capital inflows: Patterns and possible explanations. IMF Working Paper. 2005;(79). URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2005/wp0579.pdf
8. Fan Y., Xia Y. Exploring energy consumption and demand in China. Energy. 2012;40(1):23–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.049
9. Tang X., McLellan B.C., Snowden S., Zhang B., Höök M. Dilemmas for China: Energy, economy and environment. Sustainability. 2015;7(5):5508–5520. DOI: 10.3390/su7055508
10. Moiseeva E. N. Experience in generating non-financial reports in enterprises. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2019;6(6):76–86. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2408–9303–2019–6–6–76–86
11. Cort T. Incentivizing the direction of multi-capital toward inclusive capitalism. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2018;8(3):203–212. DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2018.1423850
12. Alexander D., Blum V. Ecological economics: A Lachmannian analysis of integrated reporting. Ecological Economics. 2016;(129):241–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.020
13. Brestovanská E., Medved M. Solow multi-capital growth model described by a system of differential equations on time scales. Differential Equations and Applications. 2016;8(3):335–348. DOI: 10.7153/dea-08–17
14. Evdokimova M. S., Kuzubov S. A. Non-financial reporting and the cost of capital in BRICS countries. NRU HSE Basic Research Program Working Papers. Series: Financial Economics. 2021;(83/FE). URL: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2021/06/25/1430000555/83FE 2021.pdf
15. Eccles R. G., Krzus M. P., Ribot S. Meaning and momentum in the integrated reporting movement. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 2015;27(2):8–17. DOI: 10.1111/jacf.12113
16. Lord S., Ingram J. S.I. Measures of equity for multi-capital accounting. Nature Food. 2021;2(9):646–654. DOI: 10.1038/s43016–021–00336–3
17. Chami R., Cosimano T. F., Fullenkamp C. Managing ethical risk: How investing in ethics adds value. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2002;26(9):1697–1718. DOI: 10.1016/S 0378–4266(02)00188–7
18. Scholtens B., Dam L. Cultural values and international differences in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. 2007;75(3):273–284. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–006–9252–9
19. Roques F., Sassi O., Hourcade J.-C., Guivarch C., Waisman H., Crassous R. The impact of China and India’s economic growth on energy use and CO2emissions-integrated modelling of economic-energy-environment scenarios. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2009;6:212003. DOI: 10.1088/1755–1307/6/21/212003
20. Uribe-Toril J., Ruiz-Real J.L., Milán-García J., de Pablo Valenciano J. Energy, economy, and environment: A worldwide research update. Energies. 2019;12(6):1120. DOI: 10.3390/en12061120
21. Filimonova I. V., Komarova A. V., Chebotareva A. V. Econometric analysis of the capital structure of oil and gas companies in Russia. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. 2021;20(4):624–644. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/ea.20.4.624
22. Renewable energy medium and long-term development plan. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). 2007. URL: http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2007–09/05/content_738243.htm (accessed on 01.07.2022). (In Chinese).
23. Feng X., Ding X., Jiang D. Covalent organic frameworks. Chemical Society Reviews. 2012;41(18):6010–6022. DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35157a
24. Li J., Heap A. D., Potter A., Daniell J. J. Application of machine learning methods to spatial interpolation of environmental variables. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2011;26(12):1647–1659. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.004
25. Breyer C., Gerlach A. Global overview on grid-parity. Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications. 2013;21(1):121–136. DOI: 10.1002/pip.1254
26. Lin B., Wang T. Forecasting natural gas supply in China: Production peak and import trends. Energy Policy. 2012; 49:225–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.074
27. Tao Z., Li M. What is the limit of Chinese coal supplies — a STELLA model of Hubbert Peak. Energy Policy. 2007;35(6):3145–3154. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.11.011
28. Tang J. W., Lai F. Y.L., Nymadawa P., Deng Y.-M., Ratnamohan M., Petric M., Loh T. P., Tee N. W.S., Dwyer D. E., Bar I. G., Wong F. Y.W. Comparison of the incidence of infl uenza in relation to climate factors during 2000–2007 in fi ve countries. Journal of Medical Virology. 2010;82(11):1958–1965. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21892
29. Raj B. P., Meena C. S., Agarwal N., Saini L., Khahro S. H., Subramaniam U., Ghosh A. A review on numerical approach to achieve building energy effi ciency for energy, economy and environment (3E) benefi t. Energies. 2021;14(15):4487. DOI: 10.3390/en14154487
30. Steblyanskaya A. N., Yan J., Vasiev M. P. General systems theory for sustainable green development. In: Systems analysis in economics — 2020: Proc. 6th Int. sci.-pract. conf.-biennale (Moscow: Dec. 09–11, 2020). Moscow. Nauka; 2021:138–141. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33278/SAE-2020.book1.138–141
31. Steblyanskaya A., Bi K., Denisov A., Wang Z., Wang Z., Bragina Z. Changes in sustainable growth dynamics: The case of China and Russia oil and gas industries. Energy Strategy Reviews. 2020;33:100586. DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100586
32. Steblyanskaya A., Wang Z., Gabdrahmanova N. Mathematical dynamic model for “green fi nance” sustainable growth. International Journal for Quality Research. 2021;15(1):259–272. DOI: 10.24874/IJQR 15.01–15
33. Ivashkovskaya I. V., Volotovskaya O. A. Sustainable growth of companies from emerging capital markets: Empirical analysis. Korporat ivnye fi nansy = Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2012;6(4):5–31 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073–0438.6.4.2012.5–31
34. Ivashkovskaya I. V., Zhivotova E. L. Sustainable growth index: Empirical tests for the Russian companies. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 8: Menedzhment = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management Series. 2009;(4):3–29. (In Russ.).
35. Apergis N., Payne J. E. The causal dynamics between coal consumption and growth: Evidence from emerging market economies. Applied Energy. 2010;87(6):1972–1977. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.035
Review
For citations:
Steblyanskaya A.N., Mingye A., Efimova O.V., Kleiner G.B., Rybachuk M.А. Multi-Capital Approach for Sustainable Growth: Experience from the Oil & Gas Companies. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(4):29-43. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-4-29-43