Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

Verification of Okun’s Law on Russian Data

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-4-199-210

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to assess the empirical relationship between economic growth and unemployment in the Russian economy. The research methodology is based on an econometric analysis of time series representing data on unemployment and economic growth to identify an empirical relationship between these variables. In the article continued the work on identifying the relationship between the unemployment rate and GDP in Russia based on empirical data. Based on the results of the optimal length model, the long-term Okun coefficient describing the relationship between GDP and unemployment is calculated. As a result of the empirical assessment, the Okun coefficient was obtained equal to 0.87, which is consistent with previous studies based on the data of the Russian economy. The discrepancies can be explained by the pandemic factor in 2020. It is concluded that the value of the long-term Okun coefficient confirms the stable relationship between GDP and the unemployment rate. However, its value for Russia is somewhat inferior to estimates for most developed countries and is comparable to indicators for emerging market countries. The results of the study can be used in the construction of short-term forecasts of the response of unemployment to changes in GDP, as well as in the development of macroeconomic policy measures in Russia as a whole.

About the Author

Yu. K. Zaitsev
Institute of Applied Economic Research RANEPA
Russian Federation

Yuri K. Zaitsev - Cand. Scu. (Econ.), Senior Research Fellow

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare



References

1. Baily M. N., Okun A. M. The battle against unemployment and inflation: Problems of the modern economy. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.; 1965. 211 p.

2. Verbruggen H. Book review: Robert J. Gordon. Productivity growth, inflation, and unemployment, The collected essays of Robert J. Gordon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2004, pp. I–XII, 1–504. De Economist. 2005;153(2):227–230. DOI: 10.1007/s10645–005–2936–1

3. Okun A. M. Potential GNP: Its measurement and significance. Cowles Foundation Paper. 1962;(190). URL: https://milescorak.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/okun-potential-gnp-its-measurement-and-significancep0190.pdf

4. Ball L., Leigh D., Loungani P. Okun’s law: Fit at 50? IMF Working Paper. 2013;(10). URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/wp1310.pdf

5. Furhmann R. Okun’s law: Economic growth and unemployment. Investopedia. 2022. URL: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/12/okuns-law.asp

6. Ахундова О. В., Коровкин А. Г., Королев И. Б. Взаимосвязь динамики ВВП и безработицы: теоретический и практический аспект. Научные труды: Институт народнохозяйственного прогнозирования РАН. 2005;3:471–495.

7. Aghion P., Howitt P. Growth and unemployment. The Review of Economic Studies. 1994;61(3):477–494. DOI: 10.2307/2297900

8. Villaverde J., Maza A. Okun’s law in the Spanish regions. Economics Bulletin. 2007;18(5):1–11.

9. Jardin M., Gaétan S. How Okun’s law is non-linear in Europe: A semi-parametric approach. Rennes: University of Rennes; 2011. 14 p. URL: https://www.euroframe.org/files/user_upload/euroframe/docs/2011/EUROF11_Jardin_Stephan.pdf

10. Вакуленко Э., Гурвич Э. Взаимосвязь ВВП, уровня безработицы и занятости: углубленный анализ закона Оукена для России. Вопросы экономики. 2015;(3):5–27. DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2015–3–5–27

11. Доброжинская А. А. Закон Оукена и современная российская экономика. Скиф. Вопросы студенческой науки. 2019;(5–2):133–135.

12. Казакова М. Закон Оукена: теоретические основы и оценки для России. Экономическое развитие России. 2017;24(11):27–36.

13. Morath E., Hilsenrath J., Chaney S. Record rise in unemployment claims halts historic run of job growth. The Wall Street Journal. Mar. 26, 2020. URL: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-long-run-of-american-jobgrowth-has-ended-11585215000

14. Ibragimov M., Karimov J., Permyakova E. Unemployment and output dynamics in CIS countries: Okun’s law revisited. EERC Working Paper. 2013;(04).

15. Tombolo G., Hasegawa M. Okun’s law: Evidence for the Brazilian economy. Economic Research Guardian. 2014;4(1):2–12.

16. D’Apice P. Path dependence and the persistence of high unemployment in the Slovak Republic. ECFIN Country Focus. 2014;11(3):1–9. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/country_focus/2014/pdf/cf_vol11_issue3_en.pdf

17. Cevik E. I., Dibooglu S., Barişik S. Asymmetry in the unemployment — output relationship over the business cycle: Evidence from transition economies. Comparative Economic Studies. 2013;55(4):557–581. DOI: 10.1057/ces.2013.7

18. Kargi B. Okun’s law and long term co-integration analysis for OECD countries (1987–2012). International Research Journal of Finance and Economics.2014;(119):77–85. URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/97030/1/_119_08-libre.pdf

19. Зайцев Ю. К. Воздействие санкционного режима на прямые иностранные инвестиции в Российской Федерации. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Экономика. 2018;26(4):760–772. DOI: 10.22363/2313–2329–2018–26–4–760–772


Review

For citations:


Zaitsev Yu.K. Verification of Okun’s Law on Russian Data. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(4):199-210. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-4-199-210

Views: 1561


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)