Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

Improvement of Methods of Quality assessment of Financial Management of chief administrators of budgetary Funds

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-5-33-48

Abstract

The quality of financial management is one of the key factors in achieving the goals and objectives of both commercial organizations and public sector organizations.

The subject of this study is the relationship between the budget process participants, arising as a result of organizing and conducting an assessment of the quality of financial management in accordance with the budget legislation of the Russian Federation. The degree of scientific development of the topic is assessed as low since at the moment there is no consistent approach to assessing the quality of financial management from the point of view of financial management, and therefore this issue is relevant.

The aim of the study is to substantiate the need to improve the methodology for assessing the quality of financial management of the chief administrators of budgetary funds. The issue of assessing the quality of financial management in the public administration sector is controversial and fairly new in the theory of public and municipal finance.

The author used the following methods in the paper: an abstract-logical method, analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction.

As a result of the study, a number of problems have been identified related to the reliability of the assessment of the quality of financial management of the chief administrators of budgetary funds, its significance, comparability, and objectivity, and the quality of legal and methodological support for the assessment.

It is concluded that it is necessary to clarify the current budget legislation and eliminate legal conflicts, separate the results of assessing the quality of financial management of federal ministries, services, and agencies, adjust the formulas for calculating the values of indicators in the direction of “budget expenditures management”, and also introduce disciplinary responsibility of the head of the chief administrator of budgetary funds.

The novelty of the study lies in the proposal of specific measures to improve the assessment of the quality of financial management of the chief administrators of budgetary funds in the framework of developing measures to improve the efficiency of the budget process.

About the Author

A. N. Atrokhova
Financial University
Russian Federation

Anastasiya N. Atrokhova —  Master’s student of the Faculty of Economics and Business

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare



References

1. Lavrov A. M. Logic and prospects of budgetary reforms in Russia: In search of optimal decentralization. Moscow: NRU HSE; 2019. 832 p. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/978–5–7598–1992–9

2. Belenchuk A. A., Yeroshkina L. A., Prokofyev S. E., Sidorenko V. V., Siluanov A. G., Afanasiev M. P. Programbased budget: The best practice. Nauchno-issledovatel’skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Research Financial Institute. Financial Journal. 2011;(1):5–22. (In Russ.).

3. Siluanov A. G., Starodubrovskaya I. V., Nazarov V. S. Methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of interbudgetary relations in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy. 2011;(1):5–22. (In Russ.).

4. Bychkov S. S., Kokarev A. I., Lavrov A. M. Development of methodology and practice of quality assessment in financial management of the chief administrators of the federal budget resources. Nauchno-issledovatel’skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Research Financial Institute. Financial Journal. 2018;(1):9–25. (In Russ.). 5.  Bychkov S., Boldyr A., Lavrov A. Experience and perspectives of the quality evaluation in financial management of federal government authorities. Nauchno-issledovatel’skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Research Financial Institute. Financial Journal. 2015;(3):5–15. (In Russ.).

5. Pronina L. I. The federal budget, regional and local budgets in 2016: A new twist of Russian fiscal policy. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya = Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions. 2016;1;(1):3–11. (In Russ.).

6. Zhukova A. G. Development of the public administration sector based on quality management. Doct. econ. sci. diss. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2020. 318 p. (In Russ.).

7. Zhukova A. G. The genesis of the system of quality assessment of financial management in the public administration sector. Vestnik Altaiskoi akademii ekonomiki i prava = Journal of Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2019;(6–2):23–30. (In Russ.).

8. Zhukova A. G., Adamova M. E. Methods for assessing the quality of financial management in public administration. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2019;(12):90–96. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35854/1998–1627–2019–12–90–96

9. Shmigol’ N. S. Approaches to assessing the quality of financial management in the public administration sector. Finansy = Finance. 2018;(10):20–27. (In Russ.).

10. Balikoeva M. S. The category of budget execution quality in the concept of financial management in the budget process. In: Polyakova L. P., ed. Modern research in the humanities and natural sciences: Coll. sci.

11. pap. Moscow: Pero; 2021:38–42. (In Russ.).

12. Kucherov I. I., Povetkina N. A., Akopyan O. A. et al. Institutions of financial security. Moscow: Infra-M; 2021. 246 p. (In Russ.).

13. Pisklyukova E. V. Assessment of the quality of financial management in the public sector: Foreign experience and domestic practice. In: The architecture of finance: Illusions of global stabilization and prospects for economic growth. Proc. 8th Int. sci.-pract. conf. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2019:190–193. (In Russ.).

14. Navolotskaya K. A. Financial management: Increasing the efficiency of budget expenditures. Finkontrol’. 2019;(1):8–15. (In Russ.).

15. Markina E. V. Assessment of the quality of financial management in the public administration sector: Development of principles, directions and indicators. RISK: resursy, informatsiya, snabzhenie, konkurentsiya = RISK: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition. 2018;(4):219–225. (In Russ.).

16. Sabitova N. M. Financial risks and financial activities of public legal entities. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2018;24(3):565–578. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/fc.24.3.565

17. Tkachenko L. I. Modern approaches to assessing the quality of financial management in the public sector. In: Evaluation of programs and policies in the context of the new public administration. Proc. All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. (Novosibirsk, November 16, 2018). Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Technical University; 2018:169–175. (In Russ.).

18. Valova T. D. On the need to assess the quality of financial management in the public sector. In: Topical issues in science and practice. Proc. 6th Int. sci.-pract conf. (Samara, March 05, 2018). Ufa: Dendra; 2018:18– 27. (In Russ.).

19. Zadorozhnii S. V. Analysis of the methodological support for assessing the quality of financial management of the chief administrators of federal budget funds. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovation & Investment. 2019;(10):392–394. (In Russ.).

20. Sedova M. L. Formation of a reporting system on the results of the financial management’s quality in the public sector. RISK: resursy, informatsiya, snabzhenie, konkurentsiya = RISK: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition. 2018;(4):204–207. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Atrokhova A.N. Improvement of Methods of Quality assessment of Financial Management of chief administrators of budgetary Funds. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(5):33-48. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-5-33-48

Views: 562


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)