Challenges and Threats of the Digital Economy to the Sustainability of the National Banking System
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-6-52-71
Abstract
The goal of the study – development of specific methodical reasoned proposals on improvement of the mechanism for ensuring sustainable development of the national banking system and its security against external challenges and threats to cyberspace. The scientific novelty consists in a comprehensive analysis of the processes of ensuring the cyber stability of the Russian banking system in the context of escalation of external challenges and threats to the digital economy. The authors used the following methods: general scientific (observation, comparison, measurement, analysis and synthesis, logical reasoning method), specific scientific (static analysis, peer review, graphical method). In the article conducted a critical review of domestic and foreign scientific literature and practical recommendations to ensure the protection of the banking institution from cyber threats in the digital economy; presented a comparative analysis of the organization of the cybersecurity system in the Russian and foreign banking systems; done multidimensional statistical analysis of cyber threats for Russian banks; substantiated recommendations and proposals on organizational, economic and legal improvement of the system of protection of Russian banks from internal and external cyber threats. As a result, it is shown that the main problem points (zones) of the banking system, creating the prerequisites for the occurrence of cyber-risks are: 1) there is no exchange of information on cyber-attacks and their mechanisms; 2) banks interact inefficiently with the state regulator of Internet – Roskomnadzor; 3) low level of competence of bank employees who are responsible for cybersecurity; 4) limited budget of small and medium-sized banks that wouldn’t allow them to care independent cyber-protection units; 5) growing popularity of new fintech services and new fintech companies. The author draws a conclusion that the following measures are necessary for organizational, economic and legal improvement of the system of protection of Russian banks from internal and external cyber threats: the processes of development of banking ecosystems should be intensified; a federal interbank register of cyber fraudsters must be created; a single banking «polygon» for testing cyber threats needs to be developed.
Keywords
JEL: G20, 21
About the Authors
M. N. DudinRussian Federation
Mikhail N. Dudin – Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Deputy Director for Science, Market Economy Institute
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no confl icts of interest to declare
S. V. Shkodinsky
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Shkodinsky – Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Head of the Laboratory of Industrial Policy and Economic Security, Market Economy Institute; Chief Researcher at the Center for Sectoral Economics
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors have no confl icts of interest to declare
References
1. Yablochkin A. S., Koshkin A. P. Current vectors of research in the area of information security strategies. Natsional’naya bezopasnost’ / nota bene = National Security / nota bene. 2019;(5):34–47. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/24540668.2019.5.31224 (In Russ.)
2. Timonicheva I. N., Yanovskiy V. V., Berezhnoy A. S. The level of confidence in the safety of financial technologies: A barrier or a point of growth. Nauchnyi rezul’tat. Ekonomicheskie issledovaniya = Research Result. Economic Research. 2021;7(3):81–88. DOI: 10.18413/2409–1634–2021–7–3–0–7 (In Russ.)
3. Revenkov P. V., Berdyugin A. A. Social engineering as a source of risks in online banking services. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ = National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2017;13(9):1747–1760. DOI: 10.24891/ni.13.9.1747 (In Russ.)
4. Chaldaeva L. A., Kilyachkov A. A., Yakorev A. A. On the formation of state functions to ensure security in the virtual space of Russia. Vlast’ = The Authority. 2020;28(3):37–46. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v28i3.7293 (In Russ.)
5. Bykanova N. I., Gordya D. V., Evdokimov D. V. Trends and patterns of the banking sector digitalization process. Nauchnyi rezul’tat. Ekonomicheskie issledovaniya = Research Result. Economic Research. 2020;6(2):42–51. DOI: 10.18413/2409–1634–2020–6–2–0–6 (In Russ.)
6. Khalifa N. A.-D. Cybercrime: theoretical determinants, criminal policies, prevention & control mechanisms. International Journal of Technology and Systems. 2020;5(1):34–63. DOI: 10.47604/ijts.1133
7. Zabala Aguayo F., Ślusarczyk B. Risks of banking services’ digitalization: The practice of diversification and sustainable development goals. Sustainability. 2020;12(10):4040. DOI: 10.3390/SU12104040
8. Dorn A. W., Webb S. Cyberpeacekeeping: New ways to prevent and manage cyberattacks. International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism. 2019;9(1):19–30. DOI: 10.4018/IJCWT.2019010102
9. Alpeev A. Terminology of security: Cybersecurity, information security. Voprosy kiberbezopasnosti = Cybersecurity Issues. 2014;(5):39–42. (In Russ.).
10. Bezkorovainy M., Tatuzov A. Cybersecurity — approaches to the definition. Voprosy kiberbezopasnosti = Cybersecurity Issues. 2014;(1):22–27. (In Russ.).
11. Zakharchenko R. I., Korolev I. D. Methods of estimation of stability of functioning of objects of critical information infrastructure operating in cyberspace. Naukoemkie tekhnologii v kosmicheskikh issledovaniyakh Zemli = High Tech in Earth Space Research. 2018;10(2):52–61. DOI: 10.24411/2409–5419–2018–10041 (In Russ.).
12. Carrapico H., Barrinha A. European Union cyber security as an emerging research and policy field. European Politics and Society. 2018;19(3):299–303. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2018.1430712
13. Christou G. Cybersecurity in the European Union: Resilience and adaptability in governance policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. 222 p. DOI: 10.1057/9781137400529
14. Gorian E. Cybersecurity law of the People’s Republic of China as a key instrument for ensuring information security of the banking and finance system. Administrativnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo = Administrative and Municipal Law. 2020;(3):47–55. DOI: 10.7256/2454–0595.2020.3.32677 (In Russ.).
15. Najaf K., Mostafiz M. I., Najaf R. Fintech firms and banks sustainability: Why cybersecurity risk matters? International Journal of Financial Engineering. 2021;8(2):2150019. DOI: 10.1142/s2424786321500195
16. Uddin M. H., Mollah S., Ali M. H. Does cyber tech spending matter for bank stability? International Review of Financial Analysis. 2020;72:101587. DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101587
17. Povetkina N. A., Ledneva Yu. V. Fintekh and redtekh: Boundaries of legal regulation. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2018;(2):46–67. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/2072–8166.2018.2.46.67 (In Russ.).
18. Vakulyk O., Petrenko P., Kuzmenko I., Pochtovyi M., Orlovskyi R. Cybersecurity as a component of the national security of the state. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues. 2020;9(3):775–784. DOI: 10.9770/JSSI.2020.9.3(4)
19. Cybersecurity capacity maturity model for nations (CMM). Revised edition. Oxford: Global Cyber Security Capacity Center; 2020. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3657116
20. Sutherland E. Cybersecurity: Governance of a new technology. In: Proc. PSA18 Political Studies Association Int. conf. (Cardiff, 26–28 March 2018). London: Political Studies Association; 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3148970
21. Camillo M. Cybersecurity: Risks and management of risks for global banks and financial institutions. Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions. 2017;10(2):196–200. URL: https://www.aig.co.uk/content/dam/aig/emea/united-kingdom/documents/Insights/jrmfi-mark-camillo-article-mar-2017.pdf
22. Wang F. F. Legislative developments in cybersecurity in the EU. Amicus Curiae. 2020;1(2):233–259. DOI: 10.14296/ac.v1i2.5131
23. Bakker T. G., Streff K. Accuracy of self disclosed cybersecurity risks of large U.S. banks. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 2016;18(3):39–51. URL: http://www.na-businesspress.com/JABE/BakkerTG_Web18_3_.pdf
24. De Fréminville M. Cybersecurity and decision makers: Data security and digital trust. Hoboken. NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2020. 224 p.
25. Semeko G. V. Information security in the financial sector: Cybercrime and countermeasures strategy. Sotsial’nye novatsii i sotsial’nye nauki = Social Novelties and Social Sciences. 2020;(1):77–96. DOI: 10.31249/snsn/2020.01.06 (In Russ.)
26. Nesterova D. A. Information security risks of commercial banks in the new economic and technological reality. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovation & Investment. 2020;(5):144–151. (In Russ.).
27. Shkodinsky S. V., Dudin M. N., Usmanov D. I. Analysis and assessment of cyberthreats to the national fi nancial system of Russia in the digital economy. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2021;13(3):38–53. DOI: 10.31107/2075–1990–2021–3–38–53 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Dudin M.N., Shkodinsky S.V. Challenges and Threats of the Digital Economy to the Sustainability of the National Banking System. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(6):52-71. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-6-52-71