Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

Examination of the Relationship Between Economic Growth and Research and Development Expenditures in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-2-28-37

Abstract

The article is devoted to topical issues related to the impact of investment in research and development (R&D) on the acceleration of economic growth on the example of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan. All three countries need to modernize and diversify their economies, especially in the context of unstable conditions in the world fuel and raw materials markets and the trend towards decarbonization of the world economy. The relationship between economic growth and R&D expenditures was studied through econometric analysis (Granger test), which increases the accuracy and reliability of the results. The relationship between R&D and economic growth is examined using the annual GDP data of the respective countries and the ratio of R&D expenditures to GDP for the period 2005–2018. The data were analysed using EViews statistical package. It was found that GDP growth in Kyrgyzstan is the reason for cost increases on research and development. At the same time, a causal relationship was not found in Azerbaijan or Kazakhstan. According to the results of the correlation analysis, there is a very high positive correlation (0.92) between the growth data given in Azerbaijan and R&D expenditures. However, in Kyrgyzstan (–0.69) and Kazakhstan (–0.33), on the contrary, there is a moderate relationship in the negative direction. It is concluded that one of the ways to increase economic growth in the long term is to investment in R&D. The results of the research can be used by official institutions to assess the economic profiles of the countries under consideration and in the real sector of the economy.

About the Author

N. Huseynli
Azerbaijan State University of Economic (UNEC)
Azerbaijan

Nigar Huseynli - PhD in Finance, Lecturer, Department of Business Administration

Baku


Competing Interests:

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare



References

1. Coccia M. Public and private R&D investments as complementary inputs for productivity growth. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management. 2010;10(1–2):73–91. DOI: 10.1504/IJTPM.2010.032855

2. Mercan B., Göktaş D., Gömleksiz M. AR-GE faaliyetleri ve girişimcilerin inovasyon üzerindeki etkileri: Patent verileri üzerinde bir uygulama. Paradoks: Ekonomi, Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi. 2011;7(2):27–44. URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/610068

3. Sokolov-Mladenović S., Cvetanović S., Mladenović I. R&D expenditure and economic growth: EU 28 evidence for the period 2002–2012. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2016;29(1):1005–1020. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2016.1211948

4. Ulybyshev D. N., Kenzhebekov N. D. Options and mechanisms for development of Kazakhstan’s innovative business within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union. Ekonomika Tsentral’noi Azii = Journal of Central Asia Economy. 2017;1(3):145–154. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/asia.1.3.38490

5. Niyazi A. Sh. Russia and Central Asia: Environmental problems of integration. Tsentral’naya Evraziya = Central Eurasian Studies. 2018;(1):148–174. (In Russ.).

6. Turaeva M. O. General and special in the economic development of the countries of the Central Asian region. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice. 2011;(34):58–67. (In Russ.).

7. Turayeva M. O. Economic policy institutions in Central Asian countries: From general to specific. Vestnik Rossiiskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova = Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2011;(5):126–133. (In Russ.).

8. Alizada T. Analysis of research and development (R&D) expenditures as a share of GDP during 1998–2015 in Azerbaijan. Economic and social development: Book of proceedings. Varazdin: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency; 2019:30–41.

9. Ismayilov A., Kasumov A., Ahmadova E. The impact of R&D indicators on the economic growth of Azerbaijan. Economic and social development: Book of proceedings. Varazdin: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency; 2021:1079–1087.

10. Ünal T., Seçilmiş N. Ar-Ge göstergeleri açısından Türkiye ve gelişmiş ülkelerle kıyaslaması. İşletme Ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2013;1(1):12–25. URL: https://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423904911.pdf

11. Taban S. İktisadi Büyüme: Kavram ve Modeller. 1st ed. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık; 2008. 195 p.

12. Kar M., Taban S. İktisadi Gelişmenin Temel Dinamikleri ve Kaynakları. In: Kar M., Taban S., eds. İktisadi Kalkınmada Sosyal, Kültürel ve Siyasal Faktörlerin Rolü. İstanbul: Ekin Yayınevi; 2005:7–51.

13. Acar Y. İktisadi Büyüme ve Büyüme Modelleri. 4th ed. Bursa: Vipaş Yayınları; 2002. 172 p.

14. Frascati Kılavuzu 2002. Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Faaliyetlerin Ölçümü. Araştırma ve Deneysel Geliştirme Taramaları İçin Önerilen Standart Uygulama. Paris: OECD; 2002. 257 p. URL: https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/BTYPD/kilavuzlar/frascati_tr.pdf

15. Krugman P., Wells R. Makroiktisat. 2nd ed. Transl. from Eng. Ankara: Palme Yayıncılık; 2011. 587 p.

16. Korkmaz S. Türkiye’de Ar-ge Yatırımları ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkinin VAR Modeli ile Analizi. Journal of Yaşar University. 2010;20(5):3320–3330. URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/179292

17. Ertürk M. İşletme Biliminin Temel İlkeleri. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları; 2000. 596 p.

18. Kocamış T. U., Güngör A. Türkiye’de Ar-Ge Harcamaları ve Teknoloji Sektöründe Ar-Ge Giderlerinin Karlılık Üzerine Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul Uygulaması. Maliye Dergisi. 2014;(166):127–138. URL: https://ms.hmb.gov.tr/uploads/2019/09/166–08.pdf

19. Güzel S. Ar-Ge Harcamaları ve Vergi Teşvikleri: Belirli Ülkeler Karşısında Türkiye’nin Durumu. Eskişehir Osman Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi. 2009;4(2):29–48.

20. Klette T. J., Møen J. R&D investment responses to R&D subsidies: A theoretical analysis and a microeconometric study. NHH Department of Finance and Management Science Discussion Paper. 2011;(15). URL: https://openaccess.nhh.no/nhh-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/164177/dpfor2011–15.pdf?sequence=1

21. Karakaş M., Adak M. Türkiye’de Ar-Ge, patent ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi (1970–2012). Yalova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015;5(9):127–145. DOI: 10.17828/yalovasosbil.234209

22. Genç M. C., Atasoy Y. Ar&Ge Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme Ilişkisi: Panel Veri Analizi. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi. 2010;5(2):27–34. URL: http://www.beykon.org/dergi/2010/FALL/M.Genc.pdf

23. Akın H. B. Yeni Ekonomi: Strateji, Rekabet, Teknoloji Yönetimi. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi; 2001. 356 p.

24. Ghaffar A., Khan W. A. Impact of research and development on firm performance. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting. 2014;4(1):357–367. DOI: 10.5296/ijafr.v4i1.6087

25. Freimane R., Bāliņa S. Research and development expenditures and economic growth in the EU: A panel data analysis. Economics and Business. 2016;29(1):5–10. DOI: 10.1515/eb-2016–0016

26. Inekwe J. N. The contribution of R&D expenditure to economic growth in developing economies. Social Indicator Research. 2015;124(3):727–745. DOI: 10.1007/s11205–014–0807–3

27. Erdemli M., Çelik H. Ar-Ge Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye ve G7 Ülkeleri için Bir Uygulama. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2017;7(13):122–137.

28. Sağlam Y., Egeli H. A., Egeli P. Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Ar&Ge Harcmaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: Panel Veri Analizi. Sosyoekonomi. 2017;25(31):149–165. DOI: 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.288873

29. Özkan G., Yılmaz H. Ar-Ge Harcamalarının Yüksek Teknoloji Ürün İhracatı ve Kişi Başı Gelir Üzerindeki Etkileri: 12 AB Ülkesi ve Türkiye İçin Uygulama (1996–2015). Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi. 2017;12(1):1–12. URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/364578

30. Verbeek M. A guide to modern econometrics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2008. 514 p.

31. Granger C. W.J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica. 1969;37(3):424–438. 10.2307/1912791

32. Granger C. W.J. Developments in the study of cointegrated economic variables. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 1986;48(3):213–228. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–0084.1986.mp48003002.x

33. Hamilton J. D. Time series analysis. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994. 820 p.

34. Charemza W. W., Deadman D. F. New directions in econometric practice: General to specific modelling, cointegration and vector autoregression. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 1993. 370 p.

35. Matthews P. H. Paradise lost and found? The econometric contributions of Clive W. J. Granger and Robert F. Engle. Review of Poltical Economy. 2005;17(1):1–28. DOI: 10.1080/0953825042000313780

36. Hong J. P. Causal relationship between ICT R&D investment and economic growth in Korea. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2017;116:70–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.005

37. Börü M., Çelik D. Türkiye’de Ar-Ge Harcamaları, İnovasyon ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi. R&S — Research Studies Anatolia Journal. 2019;2(5):196–206. DOI: 10.33723/rs.537587


Review

For citations:


Huseynli N. Examination of the Relationship Between Economic Growth and Research and Development Expenditures in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2023;27(2):28-37. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-2-28-37

Views: 1183


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)