Preview

Finance: Theory and Practice

Advanced search

Government Tax Regulation in the Agricultural Sector in Conditions of Import Substitution Policy

https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-2-119-130

Abstract

The relevance of the research is defined by the promotion of food security improvement for Russia and the importance of government regulation in this process. The purpose of the paper is the hypothesis verification on the positive impact of the revealed methods in the government tax regulation on the national agricultural industry development in conditions of import substitution policy with further increase of food security level in the country. The task of the paper is the analysis of government regulation methods for the development of agricultural sector. Key methods of the research are the collection and analysis of statistical data, their comparative analysis, the study of normative data base in tax regulation of agricultural sector and other documents related to the food security of the country. Authors analyze the dependence of national agricultural industry on import components. Based on that the main problems of food security in the country are revealed including the low seed fund, the lack of breeding stock, the lack of veterinarian vaccines and other medicine, weak investments in fixed capital and productive capacity, the lack of research institutes and laboratories in this sector of economy. In accordance with these reasons, authors consider the tools of government regulation in the agricultural sector of economy including the tax stimulation, grants and subsidies, preferential loans and other mechanisms, which could support the effective development of national agricultural complex. The analysis of statistical data by Federal Tax Service of Russia has indicated the effectiveness of government tax stimulation of agricultural producers, which is proved by the growth of tax revenue from this category of taxpayers, despite their decrease. Researchers indicate the development of government tax regulation measures by targeted use of tax tools for the target of a decrease in the loss of tax revenue and increase investments in fixed capital in the agricultural sector.

About the Authors

M. E. Kosov
Financial University; Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation

Mikhail E. Kosov - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assist. Prof., Department of Public Finance; Head of Department of State and Municipal Finance

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare



E. V. Golubtsova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation

Ekaterina V. Golubtsova - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Department of State and Municipal Finance

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare



E. S. Novikova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation

Ekaterina S. Novikova - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Department of Economic Theory

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare



References

1. Kulikov I. M., Minakov I. A. Food security: Problems and prospects in Russia. Scientific Papers Series: Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 2019;19(4):141–147. URL: http://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.19_4/Art21.pdf

2. Capone R., El Bilali H., Debs P. et al. Food economic accessibility and affordability in the Mediterranean region: An exploratory assessment at micro and macro levels. Journal of Food Security. 2014;2(1):1–12. DOI: 10.12691/jfs-2–1–1

3. Capone R., El Bilali H., Debs P. et al. Food system sustainability and food security: Connecting the dots. Journal of Food Security. 2014;2(1):13–22. DOI: 10.12691/jfs-2–1–2

4. Ericksen P. J. Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Global Environment Change. 2008;18(1):234–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.002

5. Lang T., Barling D. Food security and food sustainability: Reformulating the debate. The Geographical Journal. 2012;178(4):313–326. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475–4959.2012.00480.x

6. Moragues-Faus A., Sonnino R., Marsden T. Exploring European food system vulnerabilities: Towards integrated food security governance. Environmental Science & Policy. 2017;75:184–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.015

7. Kastner T., Erb K.-H., Haberl H. Rapid growth in agricultural trade: Effects on global area efficiency and the role of management. Environmental Research Letters. 2014;9(3):15–34. DOI: 10.1088/1748–9326/9/3/034015

8. Pinstrup-Andersen P. Food security: Definition and measurement. Food Security. 2009;1(1):5–7. DOI: 10.1007/s12571–008–0002-y

9. Picchioni F., Goulao L. F., Roberfroid D. The impact of COVID-19 on diet quality, food security and nutrition in low and middle income countries: A systematic review of the evidence. Clinical Nutrition. 2022;41(12):2955–2964. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.08.015

10. Mueller V., Grepin K., Rabbani A., Navia B. Food insecurity and COVID-19 risk in low- and middle-income countries. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 2022;44(1):92–109. DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13200

11. Mucinhato R. M.D., da Cunha D. T., Barros S. C.F., Zanin L. M., Auad L. I., Weis G. C.C., de Freitas Saccol A. L., Stedefeldt E. Behavioral predictors of household food-safety practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Food Control. 2022;134:108719. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108719

12. Podoba Z. S., Moldovan A. A., Faizova A. A. Import substitution of agricultural products in Russia. EKO: vserossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = ECO Journal. 2019;(7):123–139. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.30680/ЕСО0131–7652–2019–7–123–139

13. Simola H. Made in Russia? Assessing Russia’s potential for import substitution. BOFIT Policy Brief. 2022;(3). URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/253652/1/180107626X.pdf

14. Giammetti R. Tariffs, domestic import substitution and trade diversion in input-output production networks: An exercise on Brexit. Economic Systems Research. 2020;32(3):318–350. DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2020.1738347

15. Maslova V. V., Chekalin V. S., Avdeev M. V. The impact of import substitution processes on competitiveness in the agro-industrial complex of Russia. Moscow: RAS; 2017. 34 p. URL: https://new.ras.ru/upload/iblock/84d/yxgpgxl5sa9uw3ysr1bvrppnmzlw2fh6.pdf (In Russ.).

16. Lyavina M. Yu. Factors of effective agricultural import substitution in Russia. Agrarnyi nauchnyi zhurnal = The Agrarian Scientific Journal. 2018;(3):83–89. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.28983/asj.v0i3.314

17. Ushachev I. G., Maslova V. V., Chekalin V. S. Import substitution and ensuring food security of Russia. Ovoshchi Rossii = Vegetable Crops of Russia. 2019;(2):3–8. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18619/2072–9146–2019–2–3–8

18. Levshukova O. A., Saaryan A. S., Kharchenko A. V. Taxation as an instrument of state regulation of the agroindustrial complex. Estestvenno-gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Natural Humanitarian Studies. 2022;(41):182–187. (In Russ.).

19. Zhilyakov D. I. Methodological framework for assessing the effectiveness of state regulation of agricultural development. Vestnik Kurskoi gosudarstvennoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii = Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural Academy. 2020;(9):138–144. (In Russ.).

20. Akhmadeev R. G. Taxation of self-employed citizens: 2019 fiscal novelties. Audit = The Audit Magazine. 2019;4:27–32. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Kosov M.E., Golubtsova E.V., Novikova E.S. Government Tax Regulation in the Agricultural Sector in Conditions of Import Substitution Policy. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2023;27(2):119-130. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-2-119-130

Views: 471


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5671 (Print)
ISSN 2587-7089 (Online)